49:0405(35)CA - - VA Medical Center, Allen Park, MI and AFGE, Local 933 - - 1994 FLRAdec CA - - v49 p405
[ v49 p405 ]
The decision of the Authority follows:
49 FLRA No. 35
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
ALLEN PARK, MICHIGAN
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
DECISION AND ORDER
March 7, 1994
Before Chairman McKee and Members Talkin and Armendariz.
I. Statement of the Case
The Administrative Law Judge issued the attached decision in the above-entitled proceedings, finding that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) by failing to comply with two arbitration awards which directed the Respondent to pay Environmental Differential Pay (EDP), with interest, to affected employees for certain time periods. No exceptions were filed to the Judge's conclusion that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the Statute. The General Counsel and the Charging Party filed exceptions to the Judge's conclusion regarding the time period for which the Respondent must pay EDP and to portions of the Judge's recommended Order.
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, we have reviewed the rulings of the Judge made at the hearing and find that no prejudicial error was committed. Accordingly, we affirm the rulings. Upon consideration of the Judge's decision, the exceptions, and the entire record, we adopt the Judge's findings and conclusions that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the Statute by failing to comply fully with the two arbitration awards. We will, however, modify the Judge's recommended Order.
The Judge concluded that the Respondent was required to provide affected employees with EDP for the time periods from November 14, 1989 to August 17, 1990, and from April 12, 1991 until such time as exposure to potential illness from asbestos has been abated. The General Counsel and the Charging Party contend that the Respondent also should be required to provide EDP for the period from August 18, 1990 to April 11, 1991.
In the first arbitration award involved in this case (the August 17, 1990 award), the arbitrator determined that the Respondent was obligated to provide EDP to affected employees from November 4, 1989 "'until asbestos [was] abated.'" Judge's Decision at 6 (citing General Counsel Exhibit 6 at 4). In the second award involved in this case (the June 23, 1992 award), the arbitrator found that there was "no abatement of asbestos at the VA facility to this date, and specifically during the period from April 12, 1991 to the present" and that "payment of EDP shall continue unabated." Id. at 11 (citing General Counsel Exhibit 52 at 9).
As noted, the arbitrator specifically found in the second award that no abatement of exposure to potential illness from asbestos occurred from April 12, 1991 to the date of the second award.(1) However, nothing in that award, or the record as a whole, provides a basis for concluding that the arbitrator intended to exclude any period of time after November 4, 1989 from the period for which payment of EDP was required. Indeed, the arbitrator stated clearly that, as of the date of the second award, no abatement of exposure to potential illness from asbestos had occurred. As the first award required EDP until such abatement, and as the second award confirmed that no abatement had occurred, we conclude that the awards were intended to require payment of EDP for a continuous period of time from November 4, 1989. We will modify the Judge's recommended Order accordingly.(2)
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Federal Labor Relations Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, it is her