DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NAVAL AIR STATION CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1005, AFL-CIO
| DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE NAVAL AIR STATION CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS Respondent and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1005, AFL-CIO Charging Party |
Case No. DA-CA-01-0422 |
Melissa McIntosh, Esquire For the General Counsel
Before: SUSAN E. JELEN Administrative Law Judge
DECISION ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
On May 23, 2001, the Regional Director for the Dallas Region of the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) issued a Complaint and Notice of Hearing which was duly served by certified mail upon the named Respondent. The Complaint alleged that the Department of Defense, Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, Texas (herein called Respondent) violated section 7116(a)(1) and (5) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute), 5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(1) and (5), by changing the location that police officers must be standing when they wave oncoming traffic through at the two guard shacks, located at the north entrance on Ocean Drive and at the south entrance on NAS Drive, without providing the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1005, AFL-CIO (herein called Union) with notice and opportunity to negotiate over this change to the extent required by the Statute. A hearing was scheduled for October 16, 2001.
The Complaint specifically advised the Respondent that
an answer must be filed "no later than June 18, 2001" and that "a failure to file an answer or respond to any allegation in this complaint shall constitute an admission. See 5 C.F.R. § 2423.20(b)." Respondent did not file an answer, either in person or by mail, within the required period or at any time thereafter.
Since Respondent failed to answer the instant Complaint, Counsel
for the General Counsel filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on
September 25, 2001. Respondent also failed to file any response to
the General Counsel's Motion for Summary Judgment within the 5 day
time period provided for in the Regulations. See 5 C.F.R. §
2423.27(b).
No answer was received from the Respondent nor has the Respondent acknowledged receipt of any of the above-mentioned documents. Accordingly, Respondent has admitted all of the allegations of the Complaint. Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Asheville, North Carolina, 51 FLRA 1572, 1594 (1996).
Conclusions
Section 2423.20(b) of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, 5
C.F.R. § 2423.20(b) provides, in pertinent part:
(b) Answer. Within 20 days after the date of service of
the complaint, . . . the Respondent shall file and serve, . . . an
answer. . . . Absent a showing of good cause to the contrary,
failure to file an answer or respond to any allegation shall
constitute an admission.
In this case the Respondent has not filed an answer as required
by the Regulations. Furthermore, Respondent has not filed any
response to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Accordingly, there are
not disputed factual or legal issues in this case.
Consequently, it can only be found that the Respondent has
admitted that it changed the location that police officers must be
standing when they wave oncoming traffic through at the two guard
shacks, located at the north entrance on Ocean Drive and at the
south entrance on NAS Drive, without providing the Union with
notice and an opportunity to bargain over the change. Thus,
Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (5) of the Statute as
alleged.
Counsel for the General Counsel proposed a recommended remedy requiring the Respondent to negotiate with the Union concerning the location of guards who wave the traffic into the Naval Air Station to the extent required by the Statute and a posting of an appropriate Notice To All Employees signed by the Commanding Officer at the Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, Texas. In the circumstances of this case, it is found that the proposed remedy does effectuate the purposes and policies of the Statute.
Accordingly, it is recommended that the Authority grant the
General Counsel's Motion for Summary Judgment and issue the
following Order:
ORDER
Pursuant to section 2423.41(c) of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations and section 7118 of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute, it is hereby ordered that the
Department of Defense, Naval Air Station, Corpus Christi, Texas,
shall:
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Unilaterally changing the location of guards who wave the traffic into the Naval Air Station without providing the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1005, AFL-CIO with notice and an opportunity to negotiate over the change to the extent required by the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
(b) In any like or related manner, interfering with, restraining or coercing its employees in the exercise of their rights assured by the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
2. Take the following affirmative action in order to effectuate the purposes and policies of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute:
(a) Upon request, negotiate with the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1005, AFL-CIO, over changing the location of guards who wave the traffic into the Naval Air Station to the
