FLRA.gov

U.S. Federal Labor Relations Authority

Search form

Menu

You are here

ALJ Decisions*

Displaying 91 - 100 of 1005
Issuance Date Case Number Judge Dispositionsort ascending
Issuance Date March 29, 2010 Case Number WA-CA-08-0207, WA-CA-08-0208 Judge Charles R. Center Disposition Final
PDF (152 KB) | HTML

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY SUPERVISOR OF SHIPBUILDING , CONVERSION AND REPAIR NEWPORT NEWS, VIRGINIA and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF INDEPENDENT LABOR, LOCAL 2
Issuance Date May 30, 2000 Case Number WA-CA-80617 Judge William B. Devaney Disposition Final
PDF (140 KB) | HTML

NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU and ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS
Issuance Date September 10, 2001 Case Number DE-CA-00482 Judge Eli Nash Jr. Disposition Final
PDF (75 KB) | HTML

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION LAKEWOOD, COLORADO and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 3824
Issuance Date February 10, 2003 Case Number DE-CA-00721, DE-CA-00767 Judge Richard A. Pearson Disposition Final
PDF (208 KB) | HTML

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE LUKE AIR FORCE BASE, ARIZONA and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1547, AFL-CIO
Issuance Date March 28, 2002 Case Number DE-CA-01-0349 Judge Susan E. Jelen Disposition Final
PDF (164 KB) | HTML

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION SAFFORD, ARIZONA and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 2313
Issuance Date August 15, 2002 Case Number DE-CA-01-0276 Judge Eli Nash Jr. Disposition Final
PDF (206 KB) | HTML

DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AEROSPACE MAINTENANCE AND REGENERATION CENTER DAVIS MONTHAN AIR FORCE BASE TUCSON, ARIZONA and JOHN PENNINGTON
Issuance Date May 14, 2002 Case Number DE-CA-01-0445 Judge Susan E. Jelen Disposition Final
PDF (182 KB) | HTML

OFFICE OF THE ADJUTANT GENERAL MISSOURI NATIONAL GUARD JEFFERSON CITY, MISSOURI and ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS SHOW-ME AIR #93 AND ARMY #94 CHAPTERS
Issuance Date July 11, 2002 Case Number DE-CA-01-0461 Judge Richard A. Pearson Disposition Final
PDF (147 KB) | HTML

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, U.S. BORDER PATROL, TUCSON SECTOR and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, NATIONAL BORDER PATROL COUNCIL, LOCAL 2544, AFL-CIO
Issuance Date July 11, 2002 Case Number DE-CA-01-0497, DE-CA-01-0498 Judge Richard A. Pearson Disposition Final
PDF (249 KB) | HTML

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, WESTERN REGIONAL OFFICE LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS LAGUNA NIGUEL, CALIFORNIA AND U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, U.S. BORDER PATROL TUCSON SECTOR, TUCSON, ARIZONA and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, NATIONAL BORDER PATROL COUNCIL, LOCAL 2544, AFL-CIO
Issuance Date June 3, 2004 Case Number DE-CA-01-0700 Judge Richard A. Pearson Disposition Final
PDF (193 KB) | HTML

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE BUREAU OF PRISONS U.S. PENITENTIARY (ADMINISTRATIVE MAXIMUM) FLORENCE, COLORADO and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1302

Pages

* Pursuant to 5 CFR § 2423.41 of the Authority’s Rules and Regulations, in the absence of the filing of exceptions within the established time limits, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations in the decision of an Administrative Law Judge shall, without precedential significance, become the findings, conclusions, decision and order of the Authority. Effective June 1, 2014, all Administrative Law Judge decisions are publicly posted on this website one week after issuance even though exceptions may have been filed and the decision may be subject to a subsequent review and modification by the Authority. Between January 1, 2012, and June 1, 2014, only those ALJ decisions that were adopted by the Authority as the final decision of the agency by virtue of no exceptions being filed were posted as the final ALJ decision. Decisions dated prior to January 1, 2012, or after June 1, 2014, may have been the subject of exceptions and a case number search of the Authority’s decision database should be conducted to determine if the ALJ decision was reviewed by the Authority in response to properly filed exceptions.