U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER, DANVILLE, ILLINOIS and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1963
OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20424-0001
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER,
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1963
Case No. CH-CA-40344
Thornton E. Cherry, Esq. and
For the Respondent
Susanne S. Matlin, Esq.
For the General Counsel
Before: SALVATORE J. ARRIGO
Administrative Law Judge
Statement of the Case
This case arose under the Federal Service Labor-Management
Relations Statute, Chapter 71 of Title 5 of the U.S. Code, 5 U.S.C.
section 7101, et seq. (herein the Statute).
Upon an unfair labor practice charge having been filed by
the captioned Charging Party, herein sometimes AFGE, against the
captioned Respondent, the General Counsel of the Federal Labor
Relations Authority, herein the Authority, by the Regional Director
for the Chicago Region, issued a Complaint and Notice of Hearing
alleging Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the
Statute by refusing to comply with the provisions of a final and
binding arbitration award. The Complaint and Notice of Hearing was
served on various representatives of Respondent and Respondent, by
Jerry Willison, Respondent's Acting Medical Center Director, filed
an Agency Response to Complaint and Notice of Hearing. In the
Response Respondent admitted the factual allegations of the
Complaint and offered an "explanation" of its position.
Subsequently, counsel for the General Counsel filed a Motion
for Summary Judgment and supporting documents with the Regional
Director for the Chicago Regional Office and on August 18, 1994 the
matter was transferred to the Office of Administrative Law Judges
for ruling pursuant to section 2423.22(b) of the Authority's Rules
and Regulations. By Order of Chief Administrative Law Judge John H.
Fenton dated August 23, 1994, the parties were notified that any
additional pleadings or briefs in this case must be filed by
September 7, 1994, and thereafter the record would be closed.
Counsel for the General Counsel filed a brief in support of the
Motion for Summary Judgment and counsel for Respondent filed an
Agency Response to the Motion for Summary Judgment.
Based upon my review and evaluation of the record before me
I make the following:
Findings of Fact
1. AFGE is the exclusive collective bargaining agent of
Respondent's employees at the Veterans Administration Medical
Center (VAMC), Danville, Illinois.
2. On March 27, 1992, AFGE filed a grievance under the
parties' negotiated grievance procedure concerning Respondent's
implementation of a smoke-free environment policy at VAMC
3. Respondent and AFGE were not able to resolve the
grievance described above and the parties selected arbitrator Anne
L. Draznin to decide the grievance.
4. On May 21, 1993, Arbitrator Draznin issued an opinion
and award in FMCS 92-17184 on the grievance described above. In her
award, Arbitrator Draznin, inter
alia, determined that Respondent had failed
to provide adequate and accessible outdoor smoking shelters when it
implemented its smoke-free policy at VAMC Danville and essentially
ordered Respondent to reopen the indoor designated smoking areas in
Buildings 19, 26, 64, 69, 72, 104, and 125 at VAMC Danville until
the required alterations to the outside shelters were
5. Respondent filed exceptions to Arbitrator Draznin's
May 21, 1993 award with the Authority pursuant to 5 U.S.C. §
6. On December 8, 1993, the Authority in 48 FLRA No. 116
denied Respondent's exceptions to Arbitrator Draznin's May 21, 1993
7. Since May 8, 1993, Respondent has failed to reopen
the indoor smoking areas in Buildings 19, 26, 64, 69, 72, 104, and
125 at VAMC Danville pending completion of the required alterations
to the outside smoking shelters.
8. On February 24, 1994, AFGE filed a timely unfair
labor practice charge in this matter alleging Respondent violated
the Statute by failing to comply with the final and binding
arbitration award of Arbitrator Anne L. Draznin dated May 21,
9. On March 18, 1994, AFGE filed an amended unfair labor
10. On May 4, 1994, the Regional Director for the
Chicago Region of the Federal Labor Relations Authority issued a
Complaint and Notice of Hearing in this matter alleging Respondent
violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the Statute by failing to
comply with the May 21, 1993 arbitration award that became final
and binding on December 8, 1993 after Authority review in Case No.
48 FLRA No. 116.
11. On May 17, 1994, Respondent filed a Response to the
Complaint in this matter (above).
Respondent proceeded to arbitration of a grievance and it received an award of the Arbitrator which it considered to be adverse. Exceptions to the award were filed by Respondent to the Authority and were denied. The gravamen of the Complaint is that Respondent failed to comply with the Arbitrator's award by reopening the indoor smoking areas pending completion of the outside smoking areas. Respondent does not deny this allegation but avers in its Response that it has installed a substantial number of substitute outside smoking areas and therefore contends the matter at issue herein is moot. Respondent also raises matters which were previously raised and rejected by the Arbitrator and the Authority. I reject Respondent's defenses raised in its Agency Response and concluded that at all times relevant Respondent has failed to comply with the award.(1) Failure to fully comply with an arbitration award after it is affirmed on appeal to the Authority fails to comply with the provisions of section 7122(b) of th