Overseas Education Association (Union) and Department of Defense Dependents Schools (Activity)
[ v03 p676 ]
03:0676(108)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
3 FLRA No. 108
OVERSEAS EDUCATION ASSOCIATION
Union
and
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DEPENDENTS SCHOOLS
Activity
Case No. 0-AR-19
DECISION
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON A PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE
AWARD OF ARBITRATOR IDA KLAUS FILED BY THE AGENCY UNDER SECTION 7122(A)
OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C.
7122(A)).
ACCORDING TO THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD, THIS MATTER INVOLVED MEETINGS OF
THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR CURRICULUM REVIEW OF THE AGENCY'S ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL IN AUGSBURG, GERMANY. MEETINGS OF THIS COMMITTEE WERE HELD
MONTHLY DURING THE SCHOOL YEAR. THE COMMITTEE MEETINGS COMMENCED AFTER
THE CLOSE OF THE "SCHOOL WORKDAY FOR TEACHERS," AS THAT TERM IS DEFINED
IN ARTICLE 38, SECTION 1 OF THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT, AND THEY
LASTED FOR APPROXIMATELY AN HOUR.
ACCORDING TO THE ARBITRATOR, ARTICLE 38, SECTION 1 PERTINENTLY
PROVIDES:
THE SCHOOL WORKDAY FOR TEACHERS . . . SHALL COMMENCE NOT MORE THAN
TWENTY MINUTES BEFORE
AND TERMINATE NOT MORE THAN THIRTY MINUTES AFTER THE INSTRUCTIONAL
DAY.
THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT DEFINES THE INSTRUCTIONAL DAY TO BE
THE "NUMBERS OF HOURS IN THE WORKDAY IN WHICH CLASSROOM INSTRUCTION
TAKES PLACE." AT AUGSBURG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL THE INSTRUCTIONAL DAY
CONCLUDED AT 2:50 P.M. AND THE SCHOOL WORKDAY FOR TEACHERS CONCLUDED AT
3:10 P.M. THUS, IT APPEARS THAT THE COMMITTEE MEETINGS COMMENCED AT
APPROXIMATELY 3:20 P.M. AND LASTED UNTIL APPROXIMATELY 4:20 P.M.
AT THE START OF THE 1977-78 SCHOOL YEAR, A TEACHER ON THE COMMITTEE,
WHO WAS ALSO A UNION REPRESENTATIVE, COMPLAINED TO THE SCHOOL'S
PRINCIPAL THAT PURSUANT TO THE AGREEMENT, THE COMMITTEE MEETINGS WERE TO
BE ON "OFFICIAL TIME," IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ARTICLE 31,
SECTION 4 OF THE AGREEMENT, WHICH PROVIDES:
MEMBERS SERVING ON AN ADVISORY COMMITTEE FOR CURRICULUM REVIEW SHALL
BE ON OFFICIAL TIME
DURING MEETINGS OF SUCH COMMITTEES. MEMBERS SERVING ON SUCH
COMMITTEES AT THE DISTRICT AND
REGIONAL LEVEL SHALL RECEIVE TRAVEL AND PER DIEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE JTR.
IT WAS ASSERTED THAT THE TERM "OFFICIAL TIME" AS USED IN THAT
AGREEMENT PROVISION MEANT "DUTY TIME." THE UNION REPRESENTATIVE
THEREFORE REQUESTED ON SEPTEMBER 13, 1977, THAT THE COMMITTEE MEETINGS
BE HELD DURING THE SCHOOL WORKDAY FOR TEACHERS AND THAT THE COMMITTEE
MEMBERS BE GRANTED ONE HOUR OF "RELEASE TIME" TO ATTEND THE COMMITTEE
MEETINGS. IT WAS OBSERVED IN THE AWARD THAT IT IS COMMONLY UNDERSTOOD
THAT THE TERM "RELEASE TIME" REFERS TO THE RELEASE WITH PAY OF A TEACHER
FROM THE COMPLETION OF THE TEACHER'S CLASSROOM DUTIES, EITHER BY EARLY
DISMISSAL OF THE TEACHER'S CLASS OR BY USE OF A SUBSTITUTE TEACHER.
THE PRINCIPAL DENIED THE REQUEST AND A GRIEVANCE WAS FILED WHICH
CLAIMED THAT PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT, "OFFICIAL
TIME" IS THE SAME AS THE SCHOOL WORKDAY FOR TEACHERS. THE GRIEVANCE
SOUGHT THE GRANT OF RELEASE TIME FOR THE COMMITTEE MEMBERS TO ATTEND THE
COMMITTEE MEETINGS. THE DISPUTE ULTIMATELY WAS SUBMITTED TO ARBITRATION
WITH THE PARTIES UNABLE TO AGREE ON THE ISSUES. THEREFORE, THE
ARBITRATOR STATED THE ISSUES TO BE RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. WHETHER THE TERM "OFFICIAL TIME" AS USED IN ARTICLE 31, SECTION 4
IS TO BE CONSTRUED AS
MEANING THAT PERIOD OF TIME ESTABLISHED IN ARTICLE 38, SECTION 1 AS
"THE SCHOOL WORKDAY FOR
TEACHERS."
2. WHETHER THE PRINCIPAL OF THE AUGSBURG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL VIOLATED
ARTICLE 31, SECTION 4
BY REFUSING TO ALLOW RELEASE TIME FOR TEACHERS TO ATTEND ADVISORY
CURRICULUM REVIEW COMMITTEE
MEETINGS.
IN RESOLVING THE FIRST ISSUE, THE ARBITRATOR OBSERVED THAT BOTH THE
COMMITTEE AND ITS MEETING TIME WERE EXCLUSIVELY DERIVED FROM AND
GOVERNED BY THE TERMS OF THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT. IT WAS THE
ARBITRATOR'S FINDING AND AWARD THAT THE INTENT OF THE PARTIES IN THAT
AGREEMENT WAS THAT
(T)HE TERM "OFFICIAL TIME" AS USED IN ARTICLE 31, SECTION 4 OF THE
AGREEMENT REFERS TO THAT
PERIOD OF TIME ESTABLISHED IN ARTICLE 38, SECTION 1 AS THE "SCHOOL
WORKDAY FOR TEACHERS."
AS TO THE SECOND ISSUE, THE ARBITRATOR PARTICULARLY NOTED THAT THE
ACTIVITY CONCEDED THAT IT GRANTED RELEASE TIME TO TEACHERS TO ATTEND THE
COMMITTEE MEETINGS AT THE AREA AND REGIONAL LEVELS. THE ARBITRATOR
CONCLUDED IN THIS RESPECT THAT THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT DID NOT
PERMIT DISPARATE TREATMENT OF THE COMMITTEE MEETINGS AT THE SCHOOL
LEVEL. ACCORDINGLY, THE ARBITRATOR FOUND IN HER AWARD THAT THE ACTIVITY
VIOLATED ARTICLE 31, SECTION 4 OF THE AGREEMENT BY REFUSING TO GRANT
COMMITTEE MEMBERS RELEASE TIME TO ALLOW THEM TO ATTEND THE COMMITTEE
MEETINGS AT THE SCHOOL LEVEL. TO REMEDY THIS VIOLATION OF THE
NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT, THE ARBITRATOR ORDERED IN PARAGRAPH 4 OF HER AWARD
AS FOLLOWS:
4. MEMBERS OF THE AUGSBURG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COMMITTEE SHALL BE PAID
"EXTRA
DUTY" COMPENSATION FOR THE TIME THEY HAVE SPENT SINCE SEPTEMBER 13,
1977, OUTSIDE THE WORKDAY
AS DEFINED BY ARTICLE 38, SECTION 1 IN ATTENDANCE AT COMMITTEE
MEETINGS.
THE AGENCY FILED A PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD
PURSUANT TO THE RULES OF PROCEDURE SET FORTH IN 5 C.F.R. PART 2411
(1978), WHICH, TO THE EXTENT CONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION
7122(A) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5
U.S.C. 7122(A)) AND AS AMENDED BY SECTION 2400.5 OF THE TRANSITION RULES
AND REGULATIONS OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, 44 F.R. 44741,
REMAIN OPERATIVE WITH RESPECT TO THIS CASE. THE AGENCY REQUESTS THAT
THE AUTHORITY ACCEPT ITS PETITION FOR REVIEW OF PARAGRAPH 4 OF THE
ARBITRATOR'S AWARD ON THE BASIS OF ITS EXCEPTION WHICH IS DISCUSSED
BELOW. THE UNION DID NOT FILE AN OPPOSITION.
IN ITS EXCEPTION TO THE AWARD, THE AGENCY CONTENDS THAT PARAGRAPH 4
OF THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IS CONTRARY TO LAW AND REGULATION. IN SUPPORT
OF ITS EXCEPTION, THE AGENCY EXPLAINS THAT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
TEACHERS LOCATED IN OVERSEAS AREAS ARE COVERED BY THE DEFENSE DEPARTMENT
OVERSEAS TEACHERS PAY AND PERSONNEL PRACTICES ACT (OVERSEAS TEACHERS PAY
ACT), 20 U.S.C.901-907 (1976). THE AGENCY ARGUES THAT NO PROVISION OF
THIS LAW REQUIRES THE PAYMENT OF OVERTIME FOR TIME REQUIRED BY
MANAGEMENT AND SPENT BY TEACHERS OUTSIDE THE INSTRUCTIONAL