Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Mint, U.S. Mint, Denver, Colorado (Activity) and American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 695 (Labor Organization/Petitioner); Department of the Treasury, Bureau of the Mint, U.S. Mint, Denver, Colorado (Activity/Petitioner) and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 695, AFL-CIO (Labor Organization)
[ v06 p52 ]
06:0052(17)CU
The decision of the Authority follows:
6 FLRA No. 17
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
BUREAU OF THE MINT, U.S. MINT
DENVER, COLORADO
Activity
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 695
Labor Organization/Petitioner
Case No. 7-CU-5
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
BUREAU OF THE MINT, U.S. MINT
DENVER, COLORADO
Activity/Petitioner
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 695
Labor Organization
Case No. 7-CU-9
DECISION AND ORDER CLARIFYING UNIT
UPON PETITIONS DULY FILED WITH THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
UNDER SECTION 7111(B) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS
STATUTE (THE STATUTE), A HEARING WAS HELD BEFORE A HEARING OFFICER OF
THE AUTHORITY. THE AUTHORITY HAS REVIEWED THE HEARING OFFICER'S RULINGS
MADE AT THE HEARING AND FINDS THAT THEY ARE FREE FROM PREJUDICIAL ERROR.
THE RULINGS ARE HEREBY AFFIRMED.
UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD IN THE CASE, INCLUDING THE BRIEFS FILED BY
BOTH PARTIES, THE AUTHORITY FINDS: EACH PARTY FILED A PETITION FOR
CLARIFICATION OF UNIT (CU) SEEKING A DETERMINATION AS TO WHETHER CERTAIN
POSITIONS SHOULD BE EXCLUDED FROM A BARGAINING UNIT EXCLUSIVELY
REPRESENTED BY AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO,
LOCAL 695 (AFGE). /1/ AT THE HEARING, THE PARTIES STIPULATED THAT THE
ONLY POSITIONS IN QUESTION WERE THOSE OF CLERK-STENOGRAPHER, GS-312-04,
IN THE BUDGET AND ACCOUNTING DIVISION; PERSONNEL CLERK, GS-203-05; AND
PERSONNEL CLERK (TYPING) GS-203-05, BOTH IN THE PERSONNEL DIVISION.
HOWEVER, THE RECORD REVEALS THAT THE POSITIONS OF PERSONNEL CLERK,
GS-203-05 AND PERSONNEL CLERK (TYPING) GS-203-05, ARE CURRENTLY VACANT.
IN MAKING DECISIONS INVOLVING APPROPRIATE UNITS, THE AUTHORITY WILL NOT
RESOLVE ISSUES INVOLVING VACANT POSITIONS. IN SUCH SITUATIONS, RELIANCE
WOULD HAVE TO BE PLACED ON SUCH EVIDENCE AS WRITTEN POSITION
DESCRIPTIONS OR TESTIMONY AS TO WHAT THE DUTIES HAD BEEN OR WOULD BE,
WHICH EVIDENCE MIGHT NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT THE ACTUAL DUTIES PERFORMED
BY THE INCUMBENTS WHEN THE VACANCIES ARE FILLED. THE ACTIVITY CONTENDS
THAT THE INCUMBENTS OF THE ONLY POSITION REMAINING IN QUESTION,
CLERK-STENOGRAPHER, GS-312-04, IS A CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEE BECAUSE OF HER
WORK RELATIONSHIP WITH THE ACTIVITY'S BUDGET ACCOUNTING OFFICER AND
THEREFORE SHOULD BE EXCLUDED FROM THE UNIT; CONVERSELY, AFGE CONTENDS
THAT THE INCUMBENT DOES NOT ACT IN A CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY TO ONE WHO
EFFECTUATES POLICIES RELATING TO LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS AND
THEREFORE SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT.
SECTION 7112(B)(2) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES THAT A UNIT WILL NOT BE
APPROPRIATE FOR LABOR ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATION IF IT INCLUDES A
CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEE. SECTION 7103(A)(13) OF THE STATUTE DEFINES A
"CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEE" AS ONE "WHO ACTS IN A CONFIDENTIAL CAPACITY WITH
RESPECT TO AN INDIVIDUAL WHO FORMULATES OR EFFECTUATES MANAGEMENT
POLICIES IN THE FIELD OF LABOR-MANAGEMENT