National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1724 (Union) and Utah National Guard, Salt Lake City, Utah (Agency)
[ v07 p732 ]
07:0732(116)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
7 FLRA No. 116
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1724
Union
and
UTAH NATIONAL GUARD,
SALT LAKE CITY, UTAH
Agency
Case No. O-NG-267
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR
RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF
THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C.
7101-7135) (THE STATUTE). THE ISSUE PRESENTED IS THE NEGOTIABILITY OF
THE FOLLOWING UNION PROPOSAL:
THAT ALL (A)FFECTED, ON BOARD, TECHNICIANS REMAIN OR BE REINSTATED TO
THEIR FORMER POSITION
AT THEIR FORMER GRADE.
QUESTION BEFORE THE AUTHORITY
THE QUESTION PRESENTED IS WHETHER, AS ALLEGED BY THE AGENCY, THE
UNION'S PROPOSAL IS INCONSISTENT WITH FEDERAL LAW, AGENCY REGULATIONS
FOR WHICH A COMPELLING NEED IS CLAIMED TO EXIST, OR IS OTHERWISE NOT
WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN.
OPINION
CONCLUSION AND ORDER: THE UNION'S PROPOSAL IS NOT WITHIN THE DUTY TO
BARGAIN AS IT DOES NOT CONCERN THE CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT OF
BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES. ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.10 OF
THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.10(1981)), IT IS
ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE PROPOSAL BE, AND IT HEREBY
IS DISMISSED. /1/
REASONS: THE PROPOSAL, WHICH IS UNCLEAR ON ITS FACE, AROSE IN THE
CONTEXT OF NEGOTIATIONS CONCERNING THE ASSIGNMENT OF WOMEN TO POSITIONS
IN UTAH NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIANS COVERED BY THE INSTANT PROPOSAL ARE
EMPLOYED PURSUANT TO THE NATIONAL GUARD TECHNICIANS ACT OF 1968, 32
U.S.C. 709. /2/ THIS ACT, WHICH CREATES A SEPARATE PERSONNEL SYSTEM
APPLICABLE ONLY TO SUCH TECHNICIANS, PROVIDES THAT SUCH TECHNICIANS ARE
EMPLOYED IN CIVILIAN POSITIONS TO ADMINISTER AND TRAIN THE NATIONAL
GUARD AND TO MAINTAIN AND REPAIR THE SUPPLIES ISSUED TO THE NATIONAL
GUARD OR THE ARMED FORCES. 32 U.S.C. 719(A). THE ACT ALSO REQUIRES,
GENERALLY, THAT AS A CONDITION OF THEIR CIVILIAN EMPLOYMENT, TECHNICIANS
MUST BECOME AND REMAIN MILITARY MEMBERS OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND HOLD
THE MILITARY GRADE SPECIFIED FOR THEIR CIVILIAN POSITIONS. 32 U.S.C.
709(B). THE ACT FURTHER MANDATES THAT A TECHNICIAN WHO IS SEPARATED
FROM THE GUARD, AS A MILITARY MEMBER, OR WHO FAILS TO MAINTAIN THE
MILITARY GRADE SPECIFIED FOR HIS OR HER POSITION, "SHALL BE PROMPTLY
SEPARATED FROM THE GUARD, AS A MILITARY MEMBER, OR WHO FAILS TO MAINTAIN
THE MILITARY GRADE SPECIFIED FOR HIS OR HER POSITION, "SHALL BE PROMPTLY
SEPARATED FROM HIS TECHNICIAN EMPLOYMENT." 32 U.S.C. 709(E)(1). IN THIS
REGARD, THE PARTIES ARE AGREED THAT PRESENT MILITARY POLICY PRECLUDES
THE MILITARY ASSIGNMENT OF WOMEN TO UNITS WHICH WOULD BE DIRECTLY
ENGAGED IN COMBAT IN THE EVENT OF WAR. SEE 10 U.S.C. 6015, 8549.
THE UNION CONTENDS THE PROPOSAL IS NOT INTENDED TO ELIMINATE THE
REQUIREMENT OF 32 U.S.C. 709 THAT A CIVILIAN TECHNICIAN MUST HOLD A
COMPATIBLE MILITARY POSITION IN HIS OR HER UNIT. THE UNION, IN ESSENCE,
ACKNOWLEDGES THAT UNDER THE PRESENT POLICY WHICH PREVENTS THE MILITARY
ASSIGNMENT OF WOMEN TO COMBAT UNITS, IT CANNOT NEGOTIATE OVER THE IMPACT
OF A DECISION TO DESIGNATE A UNIT AS A COMBAT UNIT SINCE BY OPERATION OF
LAW (I.E., 32 U.S.C. 709) WOMEN ARE PRECLUDED FROM HOLDING A CIVILIAN
TECHNICIAN POSITION IN A COMBAT UNIT. THUS, BY OPERATION OF ITS
PROPOSAL, THE UNION ESSENTIALLY SEEKS TO CHANGE THE AGENCY'S EXISTING
POLICY OF DESIGNATING UNITS AS COMBAT UNITS IN ADVANCE OF ANY DECISION
TO ACTUALLY CALL SUCH UNITS INTO COMBAT. THUS, AS EXPLAINED BY THE
UNION, ITS PROPOSAL IS INTENDED TO ENSURE THAT WOMEN CIVILIAN
TECHNICIANS RETAIN THEIR POSITIONS UNTIL THEIR MILITARY UNITS ARE CALLED
TO THE FRONT LINE, AT WHICH TIME THE UNION INTENDS THAT THE UNIT COULD
BE OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED FOR COMBAT.
THE AGENCY CONTENDS, AND THE AUTHORITY AGREES, THAT THE DESIGNATION
OF A UNIT AS A COMBAT UNIT AS WELL AS THE TIMING OF THAT DESIGNATION IS
A MILITARY DECISION WHICH IS MADE BY THE AGENCY APART FROM AND WITHOUT
REGARD TO THE EMPLOYMENT RELATIONSHIP OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS. THE
STATUTE PRESCRIBES CERTAIN RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IN THE CIVIL (AS OPPOSED TO MILITARY) SERVICE.
/3/ 5 U.S.C. 7101. SINCE, AS NOTED ABOVE, THE UNION, THROUGH ITS
PROPOSAL, SEEKS TO NEGOTIATE OVER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF DESIGNATION OF A
MILITARY UNIT AS A COMBAT UNIT, THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT CONCERN A
CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT OF NATIONAL GUARD CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS WITHIN
THE MEANING OF THE STATUTE. SEE ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS,
PENNSYLVANIA STATE COUNCIL AND THE ADJUTANT GENERAL, DEPARTMENT OF
MILITARY AFFAIRS, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 3 FLRA NO. 8(1980).
FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, THE UNION'S PROPOSAL IS NOT WITHIN THE
DUTY TO BARGAIN.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JANUARY 22, 1982
RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN
HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER
LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES: ---------------
/1/ IN VIEW OF THE AUTHORITY'S HOLDING IN THIS REGARD, IT IS NOT
NECESSARY TO CONSIDER THE AGENCY'S ADDITIONAL CONTENTIONS THAT THE
PROPOSAL IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE PROVISIONS OF 10 U.S.C. 976(E)(1), 32
U.S.C. 709, OR AGENCY REGULATIONS FOR WHICH A COMPELLING NEED IS CLAIMED
TO EXIST.
/2/ 32 U.S.C. 709 PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART:
SEC. 709. TECHNICIANS: EMPLOYMENT, USE, STATUS
. . . .
(B) EXCEPT AS PRESCRIBED BY THE SECRETARY CONCERNED, A TECHNICIAN
EMPLOYED UNDER SUBSECTION
(A) SHALL, WHILE SO EMPLOYED, BE A MEMBER OF THE NATIONAL GUARD AND
HOLD THE MILITARY GRADE
SPECIFIED BY THE SECRETARY CONCERNED FOR THAT POSITION.
. . . .
(E) NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW AND UNDER REGULATIONS
PRESCRIBED BY THE
SECRETARY CONCERNED --
(1) A TECHNICIAN WHO IS EMPLOYED IN A POSITION IN WHICH NATIONAL
GUARD MEMBERSHIP IS
REQUIRED AS A CONDITION OF EMPLOYMENT AND WHO IS SEPARATED FROM THE
NATIONAL GUARD OR CEASES
TO HOLD THE MILITARY GRADE SPECIFIED FOR HIS POSITION BY THE
SECRETARY CONCERNED SHALL BE
PROMPTLY SEPARATED FROM HIS TECHNICIAN EMPLOYMENT BY THE ADJUTANT
GENERAL OF THE JURISDICTION
CONCERNED(.)
/3/ MOREOVER, AS SET FORTH IN 10 U.S.C. 976, CONGRESS EXPLICITLY
MANIFESTED ITS INTENTION THAT MILITARY LABOR ORGANIZATIONS BE PROHIBITED
FROM NEGOTIATING OVER THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF MILITARY SERVICE.