International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, AFL-CIO, NASA Headquarters Professional Association (Union) and National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Headquarters, Washington, DC (Agency)
[ v08 p212 ]
08:0212(46)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
8 FLRA No. 46
INTERNATIONAL FEDERATION OF PROFESSIONAL
AND TECHNICAL ENGINEERS, AFL-CIO, NASA
HEADQUARTERS PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
(Union)
and
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE
ADMINISTRATION, HEADQUARTERS, WASHINGTON, D.C.
(Agency)
Case No. 0-NG-99
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES
THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE
AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(D) AND (E) OF THE FEDERAL
SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE) (5 U.S.C.
7101-7135).
UNION PROPOSAL
IN ANY REDUCTION-IN-FORCE (RIF) ACTION, MEMBERS OF THE BARGAINING
UNIT WHO ARE RELEASED
FROM THEIR COMPETITIVE LEVELS WILL BE PERMITTED TO BUMP OTHER
EMPLOYEES WHO ARE WITHIN THE
SAME SUBGROUP IN OTHER COMPETITIVE LEVELS.
QUESTION HERE BEFORE THE AUTHORITY
THE QUESTION IS WHETHER THE UNION'S PROPOSAL IS WITHIN THE SCOPE OF
THE DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE /1/ OR, AS ALLEGED
BY THE AGENCY, IS NOT WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN BECAUSE IT CONCERNS
POSITIONS AND EMPLOYEES OUTSIDE THE BARGAINING UNIT. /2/
OPINION
CONCLUSION AND ORDER: THE UNION'S PROPOSAL IS OUTSIDE THE DUTY TO
BARGAIN UNDER SECTION 7117 OF THE STATUTE. ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO
SECTION 2424.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS (5 CFR
2424.10(1981), IT IS ORDERED THAT THE PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THIS
DISPUTED PROPOSAL BE DISMISSED.
REASONS: THE UNION IS THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE OF A UNIT
INCLUDING SCIENTISTS, ENGINEERS AND LIFE SCIENCE TECHNICIANS EMPLOYED AT
THE AGENCY'S HEADQUARTERS IN THE WASHINGTON, D.C. AREA. ACCORDING TO
THE UNCONTRADICTED STATEMENTS OF THE AGENCY IN THE RECORD, THIS UNIT
INCLUDES APPROXIMATELY 300 OF THE AGENCY'S 1500 HEADQUARTERS EMPLOYEES.
IN ADDITION, THE AGENCY EMPLOYS ALMOST 23,000 EMPLOYEES IN ELEVEN MAJOR
FIELD INSTALLATIONS AND SEVERAL FIELD OFFICES NATIONWIDE, MOST OF WHOM
ARE REPRESENTED EXCLUSIVELY IN A NUMBER OF UNITS BY THE PETITIONING
UNION AS WELL AS SEVERAL OTHER UNIONS.
THE PROPOSAL IS CONCERNED WITH CERTAIN REASSIGNMENT RIGHTS IN A
REDUCTION IN FORCE, AS EXPLAINED IN DETAIL BELOW.
THE PHRASE "REDUCTION IN FORCE" (RIF) REFERS TO THE PROCESS A FEDERAL
AGENCY CAN INITIATE, UPON THE OCCURRENCE OF VARIOUS ADMINISTRATIVE
CONDITIONS, TO ELIMINATE POSITIONS IN THE AGENCY AND TO TAKE APPROPRIATE
ACTION WITH RESPECT TO EMPLOYEES WHO HAD OCCUPIED THE ABOLISHED
POSITIONS. AS RELEVANT HEREIN, A RIF MUST BE CARRIED OUT IN ACCORDANCE
WITH REGULATIONS ISSUED BY THE OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT (OPM)
PURSUANT TO STATUTE. /3/ UNDER THESE REGULATIONS, UPON THE OCCURRENCE
OF THE PREREQUISITE CONDITIONS, INCLUDING LACK OF WORK, SHORTAGE OF
FUNDS OR AGENCY REORGANIZATION (5 CFR 351.201(A)), AN AGENCY MAY DECIDE
TO INITIATE A RIF. IT MUST DETERMINE THE NUMBERS AND TYPES OF POSITIONS
TO BE ELIMINATED AND IDENTIFY THE EMPLOYEES WHO WILL BE AFFECTED
THEREBY. AFFECTED EMPLOYEES MUST BE IDENTIFIED CONSISTENT WITH THE
SCOPE OF COMPETITION DELINEATED IN THE REGULATIONS, AS FURTHER EXPLAINED
HEREIN, BASED ON TWO CRITERIA: COMPETITIVE AREA AND COMPETITIVE LEVEL.
A "COMPETITIVE AREA" IS, IN ESSENCE, THE PART OF AN AGENCY WITHIN
WHICH AN EMPLOYEE WHO OCCUPIED AN ABOLISHED POSITION MAY COMPETE WITH
OTHER EMPLOYEES TO DETERMINE, ULTIMATELY, WHICH OF THEM WILL BE RETAINED
IN THE AGENCY. A COMPETITIVE AREA IS DEFINED IN ORGANIZATIONAL AND
GEOGRAPHIC TERMS. IT TYPICALLY WOULD INCLUDE A PART OF AN AGENCY IN
WHICH EMPLOYEES ARE ASSIGNED UNDER A SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY (5
CFR 351.402) BUT NEED NOT EXTEND BEYOND A PARTICULAR COMMUTING AREA
(FEDERAL PERSONNEL MANUAL, CHAP. 351, SUBCHAP. 2-2.B).
WITHIN EACH COMPETITIVE AREA IN AN AGENCY THE REGULATIONS REQUIRE
POSITIONS TO BE CATEGORIZED INTO COMPETITIVE LEVELS IN ORDER TO GROUP
EMPLOYEES WHO WILL COMPETE AGAINST ONE ANOTHER FOR RETENTION IN THE
AGENCY WHEN POSITIONS ARE ABOLISHED. A "COMPETITIVE LEVEL" CONSISTS OF
ALL THE POSITIONS IN A COMPETITIVE AREA WHICH ARE AT THE SAME GRADE OR
OCCUPATIONAL LEVEL AND WHICH ARE SUFFICIENTLY ALIKE IN VARIOUS SPECIFIC
RESPECTS SO THAT THE INCUMBENT OF ANY ONE POSITION MAY BE ASSIGNED TO
ANY OF THE OTHER POSITIONS WITHOUT CHANGING THE TERMS OF HIS APPOINTMENT
OR UNDULY INTERRUPTING THE WORK PROGRAM (5 CFR 351.403).
THE REGULATIONS FURTHER SPECIFY THAT WITHIN EACH COMPETITIVE LEVEL,
EMPLOYEES WILL COMPETE FOR RETENTION IN THE AGENCY BASED ON THEIR
RELATIVE RETENTION STANDING. THE "RETENTION STANDING" OF AN EMPLOYEE IS
HIS OR HER RANK RELATIVE TO THE OTHER EMPLOYEES IN THE COMPETITIVE LEVEL
BASED ON TENURE, MILITARY PREFERENCE, LENGTH OF SERVICE, AND PERFORMANCE
RATING. MORE PARTICULARLY, EACH COMPETITIVE LEVEL MUST BE DIVIDED INTO
TENURE GROUPS I, II AND III (ROUGHLY CONSISTING OF, RESPECTIVELY, CAREER
EMPLOYEES, CAREER-CONDITIONAL EMPLOYEES AND EMPLOYEES WITH INDEFINITE
APPOINTMENTS). EACH OF THESE GROUPS, ITSELF, THEN MUST BE SUBDIVIDED
INTO SUBGROUPS AD, A AND B (ESSENTIALLY CONSISTING OF, RESPECTIVELY,
EMPLOYEES WITH VETERAN PREFERENCE PLUS A CERTAIN EXTENT OF DISABILITY,
EMPLOYEES WITH VETERAN PREFERENCE NOT INCLUDED IN SUBGROUP AD, AND
EMPLOYEES WITHOUT VETERAN PREFERENCE) (5 CFR 351.501). EMPLOYEES ARE
RANKED WITHIN EACH SUBGROUP BY THE LENGTH OF THEIR SERVICE (5 0CFR
351.503).
ONCE THE RETENTION STANDING OF EMPLOYEES IS DETERMINED THROUGH
APPLICATION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED MECHANISMS, AN AGENCY MAY "RELEASE"
EMPLOYEES FORM THEIR COMPETITIVE LEVEL IN INVERSE ORDER OF THEIR
STANDING (5 CFR 351.602), SUBJECT TO CERTAIN REASSIGNMENT RIGHTS THE
EMPLOYEES INVOLVED MAY HAVE.
THE REGULATIONS PRESCRIBE CERTAIN REASSIGNMENT RIGHTS FOR AFFECTED
EMPLOYEES AND, ALSO, PROVIDE THAT AGENCIES MAY GRANT OTHERS. IN THIS
CONNECTION, THE REGULATIONS REQUIRE AGENCIES UNDER CERTAIN CIRCUMSTANCES
TO AFFORD EMPLOYEES BEING RELEASED FROM THEIR COMPETITIVE LEVEL IN A RIF
THE RIGHT, AMONG OTHERS, TO DISPLACE EMPLOYEES OCCUPYING POSITIONS IN
LOWER SUBGROUPS IN OTHER COMPETITIVE LEVELS. FOR EXAMPLE, AN AFFECTED
EMPLOYEE IN GROUP I, SUBGROUP A COULD DISPLACE AN EMPLOYEE IN GROUP I,
SUBGROUP B, IN ANOTHER COMPETITIVE LEVEL. THIS DISPLACEMENT PROCE