11:0630(108)NG DIGEST HEADINGS STATUTE SUBJECT MATTER INDEX ENTRIES DIGEST NOTES DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE -- 1983 FLRAdec NG



[ v11 p630 ]
11:0630(108)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:


11 FLRA NO. 108

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
LOCAL 225

     Union

     and

U.S. ARMY ARMAMENT
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT
COMMAND, DOVER, NEW JERSEY

     Agency

Case No. 0-NG-438

 

DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE

The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service Labor - Management Relations Statute (the Statute), and raises issues relating to the negotiability of the following Union proposal. 1

NAF employees will have the same privileges as other ARRADCOM employees in regard to the use of ARRADCOM facilities, i.e., credit union, picnic area, payroll deductions, recreational facilities.

All NAF employees will be allowed to use the NAF facilities without charge of membership or usage fees. [ v11 p630]

Upon careful consideration of the entire record, including the parties' contentions, the Authority makes the following determination.

Insofar as this proposal deals with the "picnic area" and recreational facilities, it is to the same effect as the proposal held to be outside the duty to bargain because it did not concern matters which are "conditions of employment" within the meaning of section 7103(a)(14) of the Statute in International Association of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local F-116 and Department of the Air Force, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, 7 FLRA No. 18 (1981). Based on Vandenberg Air Force Base and for the reasons stated therein, it is therefore concluded that the instant proposal is outside the duty to bargain.

Insofar as the proposal also concerns the "credit union" and "payroll deductions," the record in the case would not be sufficiently specific to allow a determination of whether such matters in the circumstances would be conditions of employment and, in any event, the Union has not asked the Authority to fragment the proposal. 2

Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, IT IS ORDERED that the Union's petition for review be, and it hereby is, dismissed.

 

Issued, Washing