14:0275(50)NG - NAGE Local R-12-33 and NFFE Local 1374 and Pacific Missile Test Center, Point Mugu, CA -- 1984 FLRAdec NG
[ v14 p275 ]
14:0275(50)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
14 FLRA No. 50
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL
R-12-33 AND NATIONAL
FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES,
LOCAL 1374
Union
and
PACIFIC MISSILE TEST
CENTER, POINT MUGU,
CALIFORNIA
Agency
Case No. O-NG-578
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority
pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and raises the question
of the negotiability of the following Union proposal.
Check-in and flight or boat underway time shall be hours of
work for permanently stationed San Nicholas Island and Santa Cruz
Island employees.
Upon careful consideration of the entire record, including the
parties' contentions, the Authority makes the following determinations.
Based on the record, San Nicholas Island and Santa Cruz Island are
offshore islands which are the official duty stations for the employees
involved herein. The Union claims without contradiction that employees
are ordered to be on the Agency's premises (Pacific Missile Test Center
and Construction Battalion Center Port Hueneme) and remain at or within
the confines of the station for the purpose of being transported to the
offshore islands. /1/
Based on the language of the proposal and the Union's statements in
the record, the proposal would require the Agency to shorten the duty
period, i.e., the traveling and waiting time would be considered hours
worked on regular workdays during normal working hours with the result
that other assigned duties would have to be performed during fewer hours
in the workday. /2/ In this connection, Proposal 7 in National
Employees Union and NTEU Chapter 80 and Department of the Treasury,
Internal Revenue Service, Central Region, 8 FLRA No. 38 (1982) which
would have required management to assign specified types of work at
specific times to bargaining unit employees and would have precluded the
assignment of other work at those times was held to violate management's
right "to assign work" under section 7106(a)(2)(B). /3/ Additionally,
in American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 3483 and
Federal Home Loan Bank Board, New York District Office, 13 FLRA No. 80
(1983), the Authority held that Proposal 2, which would have the effect
of precluding the assignment of bank examination duties during hours at
the beginning and end of the workday to those employees whose commute
between residence and workplace exceeded one hour each way, was outside
the duty to bargain because it violated management's right to assign
work. In the present case, as already stated, management would be
required to assign employees to wait either on the Agency's onshore or
offshore premises and to travel to and from the offshore islands, which
duties would be "performed" at the beginning and at the end of the
regular workday. Consequently, management would be precluded from
assigning other types of work at those times of the workday. Thus, this
proposal is to the same effect as Proposal 7 in Internal Revenue
Service, Central Region and Proposal 2 in Federal Home Loan Bank Board,
and for the reasons stated in those cases, the Authority finds the
proposal in dispute herein violates management's right to assign work
under section 7106(a)(2)(B) and is outside the duty to bargain. See
also Proposal I in International Association of Fire Fighters, Local
F-48, AFL-CIO and Naval Support Activity, Mare Island Station,
California, 3 FLRA 489 (1980).
Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review as to the
Union's proposal be, and it hereby is, dismissed. /4/
Issued, Washington, D.C., April 20, 1984
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ Union Reply Brief at 4.
/2/ Union Reply Brief at 2.
/3/ Section 7106(a)(2)(B) provides:
Sec. 7106. Management rights
(a) Subject to subsection (b) of this section, nothing in this
chapter shall affect the authority of any management official of
any agency--
. . . .
(2) in accordance with applicable laws--
. . . .
(B) to assign work, to make determinations with respect to
contracting out, and to determine the personnel by which agency
operations shall be conducted(.)
/4/ Based upon the Authority's conclusion that the proposal is
outside the duty to bargain under section 7106(a)(2)(B), it is
unnecessary to consider other Agency contentions concerning the
negotiability of the proposal.