18:0091(17)NG - AFGE Local 32 and OPM -- 1985 FLRAdec NG
[ v18 p91 ]
18:0091(17)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
18 FLRA No. 17
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 32
Union
and
OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
Agency
Case No. 0-NG-961
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority
pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and raises an issue
concerning the negotiability of one Union proposal. Upon careful
consideration of the entire record, including the parties' contentions,
the Authority makes the following determination.
Employees will be allowed some flexibility in establishing the
new work control system and desk organization as long as it is
O.K.'d by their supervisor. Any such approval of alternate plans
will be noted and signed on the employee's copy of the training
memo.
While not explained by the parties, the terms "work control system"
and "desk organization" referred to in the proposal appear to concern
the manner in which employees perform their assigned duties. Thus, this
proposal provides that proposed changes in the manner in which employees
perform their assigned duties would be subject to approval by a
designated individual, specifically, the employee's supervisor. In this
regard, this proposal is to the same effect as the third sentence of
Union Proposal 2 in American Federation of Government Employees,
AFL-CIO, Local 1858 and Department of the Army, U.S. Army Missile
Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, 10 FLRA 440 (1982). In Redstone
Arsenal, the Authority relied upon Congressional Research Employees
Association and the Library of Congress, 3 FLRA 737 (1980) (Section 8 of
the Union's Proposal) to find the third sentence of the proposal which
specified the personnel within an agency who would perform certain
functions, inc