19:0258(35)AR - Army Aberdeen Proving Ground and Local 2424, IAM -- 1985 FLRAdec AR
[ v19 p258 ]
19:0258(35)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
19 FLRA No. 35
U.S. ARMY ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND
Activity
and
LOCAL 2424, INTERNATIONAL
ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND
AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO
Union
Case No. O-AR-721
DECISION
This matter is before the Authority on an exception to the award of
Arbitrator James P. Whyte filed by the Department of the Army (the
Agency) under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management
Relations Statute and part 2425 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations.
The grievance alleged that the Activity failed to distribute overtime
duties "equally" in accordance with the parties' collective bargaining
agreement. The Arbitrator determined that the Activity had violated the
agreement by failing to equitably distribute and properly record
overtime. The Arbitrator concluded that although the record before him
did not "provide a valid basis for individual monetary awards," the
violation of the agreement justified an award of "nominal damages" to
each grievant. Accordingly, as his award, the Arbitrator awarded eight
hours of overtime pay to each of the grievants.
In its exception, the Agency contends that the award violates the
Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. 5596 because the Arbitrator did not find that but
for the violation of the agreement each of the grievants would have
worked eight hours of overtime. The Authority agrees.
The Authority has consistently stated that the Back Pay Act requires
not only a determination that the aggrieved employee was affected by an
unjustified or unwarranted personnel action, but also a determination
that such unwarranted action directly resulted in the withdrawal or
reduction in the pay, allowances, or differentials that the employee
otherwise would have earned or received. Thus, in order for an award of
backpay by an arbitrator to be authorized by the Act, the arbitrator
must find that an agency personnel action with respect to the grievant
was unjustified or unwarranted, that such unjustified or unwarranted
personnel action directly resulted in the withdrawal or reduction of the
grievant's pay, allowances, or differentials, and that but for such
action, the grievant otherwise would not have suffered such withdrawal
or reduction of pay, allowances, or differentials. E.g., Jefferson
Barracks National Cemetery, St. Louis, Missouri and National Association
of Government Employees, Local R14-116, 13 FLRA 703 (1984). In terms of
this case, although the Arbitrator determined that the Activity violated
the parties' agreement, he failed to make the finding necessary for an
authorized award of backpay. Specifically, he failed to find that but
for the Activity's violation of the agreement, each of the grievants
would have worked and been paid for eight hours of overtime. The
Arbitrator's finding that the grievants should be awarded "nominal
damages" clearly does not constitute the requisite finding and,
moreover, as indicated above, the Arbitrator concluded that there was
not a valid basis in the record before him for making the necessary
determination. Consequently, the award of overtime pay to the grievants
is contrary to the Back Pay Act and is set aside. Issued, Washington,
D.C., July 25, 1985
Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
Chairman
William J. McGinnis, Jr., Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY