21:0635(80)NG - AFGE, National EPA Council and EPA -- 1986 FLRAdec NG

[ v21 p635 ]
The decision of the Authority follows:

 21 FLRA No. 80
    Case No. 0-NG-678
                                            Case No. 0-NG-678
                         I.  Statement of the Case
    This case is before the Authority because of a negotiability appeal
 filed under section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
 Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute).  It concerns the
 negotiability of the following two Union proposals which relate to
 official time, overtime compensation, and travel and per diem for
 employees representing the Union in negotiations.
                             Union Proposal 1
          The employer agrees to provide official time, including travel
       and per diem costs, for three union representatives to prepare
       union counter proposals and other negotiations related duties for
       the union during actual negotiations.  These representatives will
       not be negotiators for the union.
                             Union Proposal 2
          EPA employees who are union negotiators will receive the same
       type of compensation, compensatory time or overtime, as does
       management where negotiations extend beyond normal duty hours.
                       II.  Positions of the Parties
    According to the Union, Union Proposal 1 is in response to the
 Agency's history of consistently limiting its negotiating team to one
 person.  Consequently, under section 7131(a) of the Statute, the Union's
 entitlements as to official time have been limited to one negotiation
 team member.  Union Proposal 1 is intended to allow official time,
 travel and per diem for an additional three representatives who will be
 available to provide support (e.g., preparation of counter proposals,
 research and clerical functions) to the Union team during negotiations.
    The Agency argues that employees representing unions in negotiations
 may receive only the amount of official time to which they are entitled
 under section 7131(a) of the Statute.  Because Union Proposal 1 would
 exceed that amount, the Agency argues that it is outside the duty to
 bargain.  As to the question of travel and per diem, the Agency argues
 that the Supreme Court's decision in Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and
 Firearms v. FLRA, 464 U.S. 89 (1983) (BATF) requires a conclusion that
 the subject is not within the duty to bargain.  Regarding Union Proposal
 2, the Agency contends that neither the Statute nor the laws governing
 payment for overtime permit overtime compensation for employees
 representing a union in negotiations.
    The Union disputes the Agency's contentions.  It asserts that the
 official time aspect of Union Proposal 1 is negotiable under section
 7131(d) of the Statute.  It contends that the travel and per diem aspect
 concerns a negotiable condition of employment and is not inconsistent
 with statute.  Concerning Union Proposal 2, the Union argues that
 employees on official time are eligible for overtime compensation under
 the laws which govern overtime in the Federal sector.  Therefore, even
 if they are not actually entitled to overtime compensation, the subject
 is within the Agency's obligation to bargain.
                      III.  Analysis and Conclusions
                A.  Negotiation of Additional Official Time
    The Authority has found that official time, beyond that authorized
 under section 7131(a), for employees who are participating in
 negotiations on behalf of the union in a support capacity is negotiable
 under section 7131(d).  National EPA Council, American Federation of
 Government Employees, AFL-CIO and Environmental Protection Agency, 16
 FLRA 625 (1984).  Based on the reasons set forth in that case, the
 Authority finds that aspect of Union Proposal 1 which concerns official
 time within the duty to bargain.
                  B.  Negotiation of Travel and Per Diem
    In National Treasury Employees U