24:0907(86)CA - Navy, Northern Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command and NFFE Local 1430 -- 1986 FLRAdec CA
[ v24 p907 ]
24:0907(86)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
24 FLRA No. 86
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NORTHERN DIVISION, NAVAL
FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND
Respondent
and
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1430
Charging Party
Case No. 2-CA-1091
(19 FLRA No. 86)
DECISION AND ORDER ON REMAND
This case is before the Authority on remand from the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. The Authority issued its
original Decision and Order in the case on August 12, 1985. The
Authority found that the Respondent had not violated section 7116(a) and
(5) when it unilaterally changed the functions of the Incentive Award
Committee on which the Union had a role as an observer. Department of
the Navy, Northern Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, 19
FLRA No. 86 (1985), rev'd and remanded sub nom., National Federation of
Federal Employees, Local 1430 v. FLRA, No. 85-1648 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 6,
1986). In finding that the Respondent had not committed an unfair labor
practice, the Authority relied on an earlier decision in National
Treasury Employees Union and Internal Revenue Service, 14 FLRA 464
(1984), rev'd and remanded sub nom., NTEU v. FLRA, 793 F.2d 371 (D.C.
Cir. 1986).
As indicated, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit subsequently reversed the Authority's decision in National
Treasury Employees Union and Internal Revenue Service. In reversing the
Authority's decision in that case, the court rejected the Authority's
conclusion that the determination of whether a particular level of job
performance warrants granting an incentive award is included within
management's rights to assign work and direct employees. Upon
consideration of the court's decision, the Authority sought remand of
this case, which was then pending before the court on appeal.
On November 6, 1986, in response to the Authority's motion for remand
in this case, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Circuit, after citing the history noted above, reversed the Authority's
previous decision and remanded the case "for a determination of a proper
remedy for the employer's refusal to bargain."
The Authority accepts the court's opinion as the law of the case and
consistent with that opinion shall fashion an appropriate remedial
order. While agreeing with the Administrative Law Judge that a status
quo ante remedy is appropriate, we disagree with his rationale in
reaching that conclusion. We find, as contended by the General Counsel
in his exceptions, that where management has made a unilateral change in
a negotiable term and condition of employment, effectuation of the
purposes and policies of the Statute requires a return to the status quo
ante, absent special circumstances, in order not to render meaningless
the material obligation to negotiate. Veterans Administration, West Los
Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, 23 FLRA No. 37, slip
op. at 4 n.3 (1986). Noting no evidence of special circumstances, we
find that Respondent's bare assertion in its exceptions that
implementation of a status quo ante remedy in this case would violate
the requirements of 5 U.S.C. Section 4302 amounts to nothing more than
mere conjecture and provides no basis for not imposing such a remedy in
this case.
ORDER
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Federal Labor Relations
Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, it is
ordered that the Department of the Navy, Northern Division, Naval
Facilities Engineering Command shall:
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Unilaterally changing the functions of the Incentive
Awards/Performance Appraisal Committee by removing from its purview any
review and recommendation to the Commander as to Quality Step Increases,
Outstanding Performance Ratings and Sustained Superior Performance
Awards, for unit employees, without first notifying the National
Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1430, the exclusive bargaining
representative, and affording it the opportunity to bargain, to the
extent consonant with law and regulations, on the decision to effectuate
such action.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining or
coercing its employees in the exercise of their rights assured by the
Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
2. Take the following affirmative action in order to effectuate the
purposes and policies of the Statute:
(a) Rescind and withdraw NORTHNAVFACENGCOM NOTICE 12451, dated June
24, 1981, and its provisions which removed from the purview of the
Incentive Awards/Performance Appraisal Committee any functions as to its
review and recommendation to the Commander concerning Quality Step
Increases, Outstanding Performance Ratings and Sustained Superior
Performance Awards, for unit employees.
(b) To the extent consonant with law and regulations, restore the
procedure which existed prior to December 26, 1979 whereby the Incentive
Awards/Performance Appraisal Committee reviewed proposed Quality Step
Increases, Outstanding Performance Ratings, Sustained Superior
Performance Awards, in addition to Unsatisfactory Ratings, Beneficial
Suggestions, and Special Achievement Awards, and made recommendations
thereon to the Commander.
(c) Notify the National Federation of Federal Employees Local 1430,
the exclusive bargaining representative, of any intention to change the
functions of the Incentive Awards/Performance Appraisal Committee, or to
remove from its purview any review and recommendation to the Commander
as to proposed awards, and, upon request, bargain with said
representative, to the extent consonant with law and regulations, on the
decision to effectuate such action.
(d) Post at its facilities at the Northern Division, Naval Facilities
Engineering Command, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, copies of the attached
Notice on forms to be furnished by the Federal Labor Relations
Authority. Upon receipt of such forms, they shall be signed by the
Commander, and shall be posted and maintained for 60 consecutive days
thereafter in conspicuous places, including all bulletin boards and
places where notices to employees are customarily posted. Reasonable
steps shall be taken to insure that such notices are not altered,
defaced, or covered by any other material.
(e) Pursuant to section 2423.30 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations notify the Regional Director, Region II, Federal Labor
Relations Authority, in writing, within 30 days from the date of this
Order as to what steps have been taken to comply with it.
It is further ordered that the remaining allegations of the complaint
concerning Respondent's failure to cooperate in impasse procedures of
the Federal Service Impasses Panel are dismissed.
Issued, Washington, D.C. December 29, 1986.
/s/ Jerry L. Calhoun, Chairman
/s/ Henry B. Frazier III, Member
/s/ Jean McKee, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES
PURSUANT TO A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR
RELATIONS
AUTHORITY AND IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF CHAPTER 71
OF TITLE
5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT
RELATIONS
STATUTE
WE HEREBY NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT:
WE WILL NOT unilaterally change the functions of the Incentive
Awards/Performance Appraisal Committee by removing from its purview any
review and recommendation to the Commander as to Quality Step Increases,
Outstanding Performance Ratings and Sustained Superior Performance
Awards, for unit employees, without first notifying the National
Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1430, the exclusive bargaining
representative, and affording it the opportunity to bargain, to the
extent consonant with law and regulations, on the decision to effectuate
such action.
WE WILL NOT any like or related manner interfere with, restrain, or
coerce our employees in the exercise of their rights assured by the
Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
WE WILL rescind and withdraw NORTHNAVFACENGCOM NOTICE 12451, dated
June 24, 1981, and its provisions which removed from the purview of the
Incentive Awards/Performance Appraisal Committee any functions as to its
review and recommendation to the Commander concerning Quality Step
Increases, Outstanding Performance Ratings and Sustained Superior
Performance Awards, for unit employees.
WE WILL, to the extent consistent with law and regulation, restore
the procedure which existed prior to December 26, 1979 whereby the
Incentive Awards/Performance Appraisal Committee reviewed proposed
Quality Step Increases, Outstanding Performance Ratings, Sustained
Superior Performance Awards, in addition to Unsatisfactory Ratings,
Beneficial Suggestions, and Special Achievement Awards and made
recommendations thereon to the Commander.
WE WILL notify the National Federation of Federal Employees, Local
1430, the exclusive bargaining representative, of any intention to
change the functions of the Incentive Awards/Performance Appraisal
Committee, or to remove from its purview any review and recommendation
to the Commander as to proposed awards, and, upon request, bargain with
said representative, to the extent consonant with law and regulations,
on the decision to effectuate such action.
Dated: . . . By: . . .
This Notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date
of posting and must not be altered, defaced or covered by any other
material.
If employees have any questions concerning this Notice or compliance
with any of its provisions, they may communicate directly with the
Regional Director, Region II, Federal Labor Relations Authority whose
address is: 26 Federal Plaza, Room 3700 New York, New York, 10278; and
whose telephone number is: (212) 264-5934.