26:0211(27)NG - IBEW and Western Area Power Administration, Energy -- 1987 FLRAdec NG
[ v26 p211 ]
26:0211(27)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
26 FLRA No. 27
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF
ELECTRICAL WORKERS, AFL-CIO
Union
and
WESTERN AREA POWER ADMINISTRATION
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Agency
Case No. 0-NG-1345
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
I. Statement of the Case
This case is before the Authority because of a negotiability appeal
filed under section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and concerns the
negotiability of one proposal. For the reasons set forth below, we find
that the petition must be dismissed.
II. Proposal
(The) union is requesting . . . a 4% across-the-board general
wage increase to be granted to all classifications listed in
Supplemental Labor Agreement (SLA) #3, Wage Schedules to be
effective on the first day of the first pay period of October 1986
as provided for in the Basic Agreement, Article 17, Section 17.5.
III. Positions of the Parties
In responding to the Union's initial request to bargain, the Agency
declared the proposal nonnegotiable because it was contrary to a
statutorily imposed pay limitation of three percent on wage increases
for fiscal year 1987. The Union contends that read together, the
parties' basic agreement, section 17.5 and SLA #3 create an "absolute
lock-step agreement" which excepts the wage increase in this case from
the statutorily imposed pay limitation. /1/
IV. Analysis and Conclusion
It is undisputed that the employees to whom this proposal would apply
are prevailing rate employees who are covered by section 9(b) of Public
Law No. 92-392. As we discussed in International Brotherhood of
Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO, Local Union 1245 and Department of the
Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, 25 FLRA No. 15 (1987), under section
704 of the Civil Service Reform Act of 1978, Public Law No. 95-454, 92
Stat. 1111, 1218, matters pertaining to pay and pay practices of these
"section 9(b)" employees are subject to negotiation. See Columbia Power
Trades Council and United States Department of Energy, Bonneville Power
Administration, 22 FLRA No. 100 (1986) for a discussion of this
provision.
Section 101(m) of Public Law No. 99-591 (approved October 30, 1986),
which made continuing appropriations for fiscal year 1987, incorporated
section 613 of Title VI of the Act making appropriations for the
Treasury Department and other agencies. Under section 613, wage
increases for prevailing rate employees covered by section 9(b) may not
exceed the three percent increase provided for General Schedule (GS)
employees, and must be delayed for 90 days, except where the increases
in wage schedules or rates are "required by the terms of a contract"
entered into before the date of enactment of Public Law 99-591. See
Federal Personnel Manual (FPM) Bulletin 532-75 (January 23, 1987). More
specifically, any contract falling under this exception must have been
entered into before October 18, 1986. Id.
The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) is charged by Congress with
administering the pay limitation concerning prevailing rate employees
who are covered under section 9(b). See Public Law No. 99-591. As
interpreted by OPM in FPM Bulletin 532-75, the condition for being
excepted from the pay limitation is met when either of the following
criteria is met:
(a) the contract dictates specific rates of pay, or specific
monetary or percentage increases; or
(b) the contract dictates a fixed pay-setting procedure which
results in a specific increase; however, none of the elements of
the pay-setting procedure may be subject to further negotiation by
the parties ("elements" are defined as, but not limited to,
formulas, names of companies, wage data to be used, etc.). Thus,
the pay-setting procedure must automatically compute specific
rates of pay, or specific monetary or percentage increases.
Concerning the effective date for implementation of any wage
increase, OPM stated in FPM Bulletin 532-75 that:
If the increases are exempt from the statutory limitation, they
will be effective on the date determined under the provisions of
the contract.
If the increases are subject to the statutory limitation, they
will be placed into effect no sooner than ninety days after the
increase would otherwise become effective or, when no effective
date is specified in the contract, the increases will be placed
into effect:
(a) on the anniversary date of the last increase if that
increase was delayed 90 days by law; or
(b) ninety days after the anniversary date of the last increase
if that increase was not delayed by law.
It is undisputed that the wage increase set forth in the Union's
proposal exceeds that provided for GS employees for fiscal year 1987.
Therefore, in order to rule on the negotiability of the proposal it is
necessary to determine whether the parties' contract fulfills the
criteria for being excepted from the pay limitation. The relevant
contract provisions are as follows:
Section 17.5, Basic Labor Agreement
Supplementary wage adjustments shall become effective upon
approval or on the first day of the first pay period of October,
whichever is later, unless agreed otherwise by the parties.
(Modified October 1, 1984)
Existing rates of pay shall remain in effect until supplanted
by new rates negotiated pursuant to this section.
All rates must be established as nearly as is consistent with
prevailing rates in the private sector within the geographic area
of Western.
SLA #3 (in pertinent part)
Three-Year Agreement
This Agreement has a three-year duration period, from October
1, 1984 to October 1, 1987. Salary adjustments reflected by the
enclosed pay schedule will be implemented effective September 16,
1984, and January 20, 1985. For the scheduled October 1985 salary
adjustment, the parties will conduct a joint telephone su