26:0691(85)CA - Army and Air Force, Army and Air Force Exchange Service, HQ, Dallas, TX and Army and Air Force Exchange Service, McClellan AFB, CA and AFGE Local 1857 -- 1987 FLRAdec CA
[ v26 p691 ]
26:0691(85)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
26 FLRA No. 85
DEPARTMENTS OF THE ARMY AND AIR FORCE
ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICE
HEADQUARTERS, DALLAS, TEXAS AND
ARMY AND AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICE
McCLELLAN AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
Respondent
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1857, AFL-CIO
Charging Party
Case No. 9-CA-60288
DECISION AND ORDER
I. Statement of the Case
This matter is before the Authority under section 2429.1(a) of our
Regulations based on the parties' stipulation of facts. The complaint
alleges that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the
Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) by
refusing to provide the Union with the names and home addresses of all
employees in the McClellan Air Force Base Exchange bargaining unit. The
General Counsel and the Respondent have filed briefs with the Authority.
For the reasons discussed below, we find that the Respondent has
committed the unfair labor practices as alleged.
II. Background
By letter dated May 5, 1986, the President of AFGE Local 1857 (the
Union) requested the Manager of the McClellan Air Force Base Exchange to
provide the Union with the names and home addresses of all bargaining
unit employees at the Exchange. There are 82 employees in the unit, of
whom 29 are regular full-time and 53 are regular part-time employees.
In its request for the information, the Union cited American Federation
of Government Employees, Local 1760 v. FLRA, 756 F.2d 554 (2d Cir.
1986). Later in May, the Respondent gave the Union a listing of the
names, job titles and job locations of employees in the bargaining unit,
but did not provide the employees' home addresses. The Respondent has
continued to refuse to provide the home addresses of employees to the
Union.
The parties have stipulated that the information requested by the
Union constitutes data within the meaning of section 7114(b)(4) of the
Statute which is normally maintained by the Respondent in the regular
course of business; is reasonably available and necessary for full and
proper discussion, understanding, and negotiation of subjects within
collective bargaining; and does not constitute guidance, advice,
counsel, or training provided for local management officials or
supervisors relating to collective bargaining.
III. Positions of the Parties
A. The Respondent
The Respondent asserts that this case presents an issue which
distinguishes it from our decision on remand in the lead "names and home
addresses" case, Farmers Home Administration Finance Office, St. Louis,
Missouri, 23 FLRA No. 101 (1986), petition for review filed sub nom.
U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Farmers Home Administration
Finance Office, St. Louis, Missouri v. FLRA, No. 86-2579 (8th Cir. Dec.
23, 1986). The Respondent argues that in deciding that release of the
names and home addresses of bargaining unit employees to the exclusive
representative was not prohibited by law, the Authority placed great
weight on an analysis of exception (b)(3) of the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C.
section 552a(b)(3), which permits disclosure of information for a
"routine use." The Respondent further argues that published statements
of the Office of Personnel Management (OPM), which define routine uses
of information in personnel records and include labor organizations as
routine users of that information, were a key factor in the Authority's
decision that disclosure of employees' home addresses to unions was
permitted as a routine use under exception (b)(3) of the Privacy Act.
The Respondent notes that the employees in this case are employed by
the Army and Air Force Exchange Service (AAFES) and are not subject to
OPM regulations, and therefore the OPM routine use statement does not
apply to them. The Respondent also notes that the AAFES routine use
statements do not include labor organizations as routine users of
information in AAFES' systems of records, and therefore contends that
disclosure of employees' home addresses to the Union cannot be made
under exception (b)(3) of the Privacy Act. Accordingly, the Respondent
contends that the "routine user" theory which we applied in Farmers Home
cannot be applied in this case.
The Respondent asserts that we must decide this case by balancing the
employees' right to privacy against the public interest in disclosure,
and that in so doing we should reconsider our Farmers Home decision and
apply the decision of the court in American Federation of Government
Employees, Local 1923 v. United States, Department of Health and Human
Service, 712 F.2d 931 (4th Cir. 1983). Finally, the Respondent notes
that in 1985 it had attempted to make a reasonable accommodation to AFGE
by providing an alternate way for it to obtain the home addresses of
employees; however, the Respondent states that it does not pursue this
point because we ruled on this theory in Farmers Home.
B. The General Counsel
The General Counsel argues that our decision in Farmers Home is
controlling in this case. The General Counsel submits that the
Respondent's refusal to provide the home addresses of bargaining unit
employees violates section 7114(b)(4) of the Statute and constitutes the
unfair labor practices alleged in the complaint.
IV. Analysis and Conclusions
In our decision on remand in Farmers Home, we held that the release
of the names and home addresses of bargaining unit employees to
exclusive representatives is not prohibited by law, is necessary for
unions to fulfill their duties under the Statute, and meets all of the
other requirements of section 7114(b)(4). Our decision in Farmers Home
analyzed the two exceptions to the Privacy Act's bar to disclosure of
personal information pertinent to the release of employees' names and
home addresses: exception (b)(2) concerning the Freedom of Information
Act, and exception (b)(3) relating to "routine use" of information.
The Respondent correctly notes that AAFES employees are not subject
to OPM regulations; that the employees' personnel files are not
governed by the OPM's routine use statements; and that AAFES' routine
use statements do not include unions as routine users. Therefore,
disclosure of McClellan Air Force Base Exchange employees' home
addresses to the Union may not be authorized under exception (b)(3) of
the Privacy Act.
However, this distinction does not affect the disclosure of these
employees' home addresses to the Union under exception (b)(2) of the
Privacy Act. Exception (b)(2) states that if the disclosure of the
requested information is required by the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA), the Privacy Act's bar to disclosure is not applicable. 5 U.S.C.
section 552a(b)(2). In Farmers Home, we discussed exception (b)(2) and
applied the necessary balancing test under the FOIA. We stated in
Farmers Home (slip op. at 6):
On balance, we find that the public interest to be furthered by
providing the Union with an efficient method to communicate with
unit employees it must represent far outweighs the privacy
interests of individual employees in their names and home
addresses. Disclosure of the requested information would not
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy and
does not fall within the (b)(6) exemption to the FOIA. Since the
information does not fall within the exemption, its disclosure is
required under the FOIA and, under exception (b)(2) to the Privacy
Act, its release is not prohibited by law.
We reaffirm that conclusion here, and find that the information
sought by the Union could be released by the Respondent under exception
(b)(2) of the Privacy Act. For the reasons set forth more fully in
Farmers Home, we reject the Respondent's suggestion that we adopt the
approach of the court in AFGE, Local 1923, 712 F.2d 931.
We also find, as we did in Farmers Home, that the release of the
information is generally required without regard to whether alternative
means of communication are available. Further, through the parties'
stipulation, it is evident that the other requirements of section 7114
(b)(4)(A), (B) and (C) have been met. Consistent with our decision in
Farmers Home, we therefore find that the Respondent was required to
furnish the Union with the home addresses of the employees in the
bargaining unit. Its refusal to do so violated section 7116(a)(1) and
(8) of the Statute.
V. Order
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations
and section 7118 of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations
Statute, the Departments of the Army and Air Force, Army and Air Force
Exchange Service, Headquarters, Dallas, Texas and the Army and Air Force
Exchange Service, McClellan Air Force Base, California, shall:
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Refusing to furnish, upon request of the American Federation of
Government Employees, Local 1857, ALF-CIO, the exclusive representative
of its employees, the names and home addresses of all bargaining unit
employees located at its McClellan Air Force Base Exchange.
(b) In any like or related manner, interfering with, restraining, or
coercing its employees in the exercise of rights assured them by the
Statute.
2. Take the following affirmative action in order to effectuate the
purposes and policies of the Statute:
(a) Upon request by the American Federation of Government Employees,
Local 1857, AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of its employees,
furnish it with the names and home addresses of all bargaining unit
employees located at its McClellan Air Force Base Exchange.
(b) Post at all its facilities at the McClellan Air Force Base
Exchange, where bargaining unit employees represented by the American
Federation of Government Employees, Local 1857, AFL-CIO are located,
copies of the attached Notice on forms to be furnished by the Federal
Labor Relations Authority. Upon receipt of such forms, they shall be
signed by the Directors of the Departments of the Army and Air Force,
Army and Air Force Exchange Service, Headquarters, Dallas, Texas and the
Army and Air Force Exchange Service, McClellan Air Force Base,
California, and shall be posted and maintained for 60 consecutive days
thereafter, in conspicuous places, including all bulletin boards and
other places where notices to employees are customarily posted.
Reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure that such Notices are not
altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.
(c) Pursuant to section 2423.30 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations, notify the Regional Director, Region IX, Federal Labor
Relations Authority, in writing, within 30 days from the date of this
Order, as to what steps have been taken to comply with this Order.
Issued, Washington, D.C., April 28, 1987.
/s/ Jerry L. Clahoun, Chairman
/s/ Henry B. Frazier III, Member
/s/ Jean McKee, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES
PURSUANT TO A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR
RELATIONS
AUTHORITY AND IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF CHAPTER 71
OF TITLE
5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT
RELATIONS
STATUTE
WE HEREBY NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT:
WE WILL NOT refuse to furnish, upon request of the American
Federation of Government Employees, Local 1857, AFL-CIO, the exclusive
representative of our employees, the names and home addresses of all
bargaining unit employees located at our McClellan Air Force Base
Exchange.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, restrain,
or coerce our employees in the exercise of rights assured them by the
Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.
WE WILL, upon request by the American Federation of Government
Employees, Local 1857, AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of our
employees, furnish it with the names and home addresses of all
bargaining unit employees located at our McClellan Air Force Base
Exchange.
(Activity) . . .
Dated: . . . By: (Signature) . . . (Title) . . .
Dated: . . . By: (Signature) . . . (Title) . . .
This Notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date
of posting, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other
material.
If employees have any questions concerning this Notice or compliance
with its provisions, they may communicate directly with the Regional
Director, Region IX, Federal Labor Relations Authority, whose address
is: 901 Market Street, Suite 200, San Francisco, California 94103, and
whose telephone number is: (415) 995-5000.