33:0281(32)NG - - National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, District 1199 and VA Medical Center, Dayton, OH - - 1988 FLRAdec NG - - v33 p281



[ v33 p281 ]
33:0281(32)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:


33 FLRA No. 32

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

NATIONAL UNION OF HOSPITAL AND HEALTH CARE

EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, DISTRICT 1199

and

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL CENTER

DAYTON, OHIO

0-NG-1072

(28 FLRA 435)

DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES ON REMAND

October 24, 1988

Before Chairman Calhoun and Member McKee.

I. Statement of the Case

This case is before the Authority on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. See Veterans Administration Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio v. FLRA, No. 87-1521 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 27, 1988). The court granted the Authority's motion to remand the case in light of the court's decision in Colorado Nurses Association v. FLRA, 851 F.2d 1486 (D.C. Cir. 1988).

II. Background

On July 31, 1987, the Authority issued its decision and order on negotiability issues in National Union of Hospital and Health Care Employees, AFL-CIO, District 1199 and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Dayton, Ohio, 28 FLRA 435 (1987) (VAMC, Dayton). The collective bargaining proposals at issue in VAMC, Dayton, concerned, among other things, staffing, training, proficiency reports and promotions, professional standards board, annual and sick leave, work schedules, scheduled holidays, filling of vacancies, working groups, assignment of duties, and health and safety relating to professional medical employees in the Department of Medicine and Surgery (DM&S).

The Veterans Administration (VA) contended that the proposals were not subject to the duty to bargain under the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) because title 38 of the United States Code provides the Administrator of the VA with statutory authority to regulate conditions of employment of professional medical employees in the DM&S. Based on its decision in Colorado Nurses Association and Veterans Administration Medical Center, Ft. Lyons, Colorado, 25 FLRA 803 (1987) (VAMC, Ft. Lyons), the Authority found that the Statute applies to DM&S employees and that as a general matter the VA has a duty to bargain over the conditions of employment of those employees. As to the specific proposals in dispute, the Authority found some to be negotiable and others to be nonnegotiable.

Both the Colorado Nurses Association and the Veterans Administration petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for review of the Authority's decision in VAMC, Ft. Lyons. The court reversed the Authority's ruling that the VA is obligated to bargain over conditions of employment of DM&S employees and concluded that the VA need not bargain over any of the contested proposals. Colorado Nurses Association v. FLRA, 851 F.2d 1486 (D.C. Cir. 1988). The court found that the Statute's authorization of collective bargaining over conditions of employment for those employees conflicts with the authority of the VA Administrator under 38 U.S.C. § 4108(a). Section 4108(a) provides that "[n]otwithstanding any law, Executive order, or regulation" the VA Administrator "shall prescribe by regulation the hours and conditions of employment and leaves of absence of" DM&S professional employees. The court stated that "[i]n enacting section 4108, Congress intended to give the Administrator unfettered discretion to issue regulations concerning the working conditions of DM & S employees." Id. at 1492.

On September 6, 1988, the Authority petitioned the court for the remand of cases involving DM&S employees of the VA, including VAMC, Dayton, which the court had held in abeyance pending its resolution of Colorado Nurses Association v. FLRA. The Authority asked that the cases be remanded "for disposition in the first instance" consistent with