37:1231(105)CA - - Air Force, 3245th Air Base Group, Hanscom AFB, Bedford, MA and Richard D. Martino - - 1990 FLRAdec CA - - v37 p1231
[ v37 p1231 ]
The decision of the Authority follows:
37 FLRA No. 105
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
3245th AIR BASE GROUP
HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE
RICHARD D. MARTINO
DECISION AND ORDER
October 26, 1990
Before Chairman McKee and Members Talkin and Armendariz.
I. Statement of the Case
This unfair labor practice case is before the Authority on exceptions filed by the Respondent to the attached decision of the Administrative Law Judge. The General Counsel filed an opposition to the exceptions.
The complaint alleged that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (2) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) when it: (1) refused to rehire the Charging Party because he had engaged in union activity during his previous employment with the Respondent; and (2) stated to employees that the Charging Party would not be rehired because of the previous union activities.
The Judge found that the Respondent violated the Statute, as alleged in the complaint. The Judge noted, in this regard, that the case "turn[ed] i[n] large measure on the credibility of the witnesses involved." Judge's Decision at 18. The Judge, based on his credibility determinations and the record as a whole, concluded that the Respondent refused to rehire the Charging Party because of his prior union activities and that the Respondent stated so to other employees. The Judge concluded also that the reasons offered by the Respondent for its failure to rehire the Charging Party were "a pretext to mask the unlawful reason . . . ." Id. at 22.
The Judge's recommended Order requires the Respondent, among other things, to offer the Charging Party immediate and full employment and to make him whole for his losses.
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, we have reviewed the rulings of the Judge made at the hearing and find that no prejudicial error was committed. We affirm the rulings. On consideration of the Judge's decision, the exceptions, (1) and the entire record, we adopt the Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommended Order. (2)
Accordingly, we conclude that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1) and (2) of the Statute by refusing to rehire the Charging Party because of his previous union activities and by stating to employees that the Charging Party would not be rehired for that reason.
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Federal Labor Relations Authority's Rules and Regulations, and section 7118 of the Statute, the Department of the Air Force, 3245th Air Base Group, Hanscom Air Force Base, Bedford, Massachusetts, shall:
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Refusing to employ Richard D. Martino, or any other applicant for employment, because the applicant previously has engaged in or might, if employed, engage in activities protected by the Statute.
(b) Making statements to employees or applicants for employment that employment will be denied to a person who has engaged in or, if employed, might engage in activities protected by the Statute.
(c) In any like or related manner, interfering with, restraining, or coercing its employees in the exercise of rights assured them by the Statute.
2. Take the following affirmative action in order to effectuate the purposes and policies of the Statute:
(a) Offer Richard D. Martino immediate and full employment in the position of Painter, WG-4102-9, as referred to in vacancy announcement 455-87, or a substantially equivalent position, and make him whole for the losses he incurred as a result of the refusal to reemploy him by providing him with backpay, with interest, from February 13, 1989, until such time as he is reemployed in compliance with this Order, and by providing him with all benefits and privileges retroactive to February 13, 1989, consistent with applicable law and