40:0973(83)CA - - GSA, Region IX, San Francisco, CA and AFGE - - 1991 FLRAdec CA - - v40 p973
[ v40 p973 ]
The decision of the Authority follows:
40 FLRA No. 83
Before Chairman McKee and Members Talkin and Armendariz.
I. Statement of the Case
The Administrative Law Judge issued the attached decision in the above-entitled proceeding finding that the Respondent did not violate section 7116(a)(1) and (2) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) because the Respondent did not, as alleged, issue a two-day suspension to an employee because he filed grievances and used official time. The Judge recommended that the complaint be dismissed. The Charging Party filed exceptions to the Judge's decision. The Respondent did not file an opposition to the Charging Party's exceptions.
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, we have reviewed the rulings of the Judge made at the hearing. Consistent with the foregoing discussion we find that no prejudicial error was committed and we affirm the rulings.
Upon consideration of the Judge's Decision and the entire record, we adopt the Judge's findings, conclusions and recommended Order.
The Complaint in this case is dismissed.