45:0886(83)CA - - Patent and Trademark Office and NTEU, Chapter 243 - - 1992 FLRAdec CA - - v45 p886
[ v45 p886 ]
The decision of the Authority follows:
45 FLRA No. 83
Before Chairman McKee and Members Talkin and Armendariz.
I. Statement of the Case
The Administrative Law Judge issued the attached decision in the above-entitled proceeding finding that the Respondent did not violate the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) because it was not responsible for the actions of an Office of Inspector General representative during an interview of a unit employee. The General Counsel filed exceptions to the Judge's decision and the Respondent filed an opposition to the General Counsel's exceptions.
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, we have reviewed the Judge's rulings made at the hearing and find that no prejudicial error was committed. We affirm the rulings. Upon consideration of the Judge's decision and the entire record, we adopt the Judge's findings, conclusions, and recommended Order, and will dismiss the complaint.
The complaint is dismissed.
(If blank, the decision does not have foo