45:0921(89)RP - - Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Distribution Region East and AFGE Local 2004 and Letterkenny Army Depot - - 1992 FLRAdec RP - - v45 p921



[ v45 p921 ]
45:0921(89)CU
The decision of the Authority follows:


45 FLRA No. 89

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION REGION EAST

(Activity/Petitioner)

and

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES

LOCAL 2004

(Labor Organization)

and

LETTERKENNY ARMY DEPOT

(Intervenor)

BP-CU-20001

ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR REVIEW

August 14, 1992

On August 10, 1992, the Authority issued an Order dismissing the Labor Organization's application for review of the Regional Director's Decision and Order in the above-captioned case for failure to respond to the Authority's July 14, 1992, Order directing the Labor Organization to show cause why its application for review should not be dismissed as untimely. Subsequent to issuance of the August 10 Order, the Authority received the Union's timely response to its July 14 Order. Therefore, The Authority's August 10 Order is rescinded. However, for the reasons set out below, the Union's application for review is untimely and must be dismissed.

The Authority's Regulations provide that "[a] party may file an application for review of the Regional Director's Decision and Order with the Authority within sixty (60) days of the date of such action." 5 C.F.R. § 2422.17(a). The time limit for filing an application for review may not be extended or waived. Id. and 5 C.F.R. § 2429.23(d).

The Regional Director issued his Decision and Order on April 30, 1992. Any application for review of the Decision and Order had to be either postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service or received in person at the Authority no later than June 29, 1992, in order to be considered timely. The Labor Organization's application for review was filed (postmarked) on June 30, 1992.

The Authority's July 14, 1992, Order directed the Labor Organization to show cause why its application for review should not be dismissed as u