48:0657(66)AR - - National Border Patrol Council, Local 2913 and Justice, INS Border Patrol - - 1993 FLRAdec AR - - v48 p657



[ v48 p657 ]
48:0657(66)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:


48 FLRA No. 66

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_____

NATIONAL BORDER PATROL COUNCIL

LOCAL 2913

(Union)

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE BORDER PATROL

(Agency)

0-AR-2493

_____

DECISION

October 8, 1993

_____

Before Chairman McKee and Members Talkin and Armendariz.

I. Statement of the Case

This matter is before the Authority on an exception to an award of Arbitrator James L. Macpherson filed by the Union under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and part 2425 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. The Agency did not file an opposition to the Union's exception.

The Union filed a grievance seeking to reverse the grievant's 5-day suspension for alleged misconduct in giving careless and negligent testimony in a proceeding in Federal court. The Arbitrator sustained the grievance and ordered the Agency to rescind the grievant's suspension, restore his salary and benefits, and remove materials relating to his suspension from his personnel file. Additionally, the Arbitrator denied the Union's request that the backpay include interest.

For the following reasons, we conclude that the portion of the award denying interest on the backpay is deficient because it is contrary to law. Accordingly, we will modify the award to provide for the payment of interest on the backpay award.

II. Arbitrator's Award

As pertinent here, the Arbitrator determined that the Agency violated Article 31, Section F(3) of the parties' agreement by failing to provide the grievant "notice of his suspension discipline at the earliest practicable time[.]"(*) Award at 20. As a remedy, the Arbitrator directed the Agency to rescind the grievant's 5-day suspension, restore his salary and benefits, and remove materials relating to his suspension from his personnel file. In his award granting backpay, the Arbitrator stated that "no interest shall be applied to the amount of salary to be restored." Id.

III. The Union's Exception

The Union contends that "[t]he payment of interest is not discretionary under the Back Pay Act, as amended." Exception at 2. To support this contention, the Union cites 5 U.S.C. § 5596(b)(2)(A) as amended in 1987 by Public Law No. 100-202, which states that an amount payable under paragraph (1)(A)(i) of the Back Pay Act shall be payable with interest.

IV. Analysis and Conclusion

Under the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. § 5596(b), as amended, an employee who is found to have been subjected to an unwarranted personnel action that has resulted in a withdrawal or reduction in compensation is entitled to interest on any backpay award. For example, U.S. Department of the Army, Fort Polk, Louisiana and National Association of Government Employees, Local R5-168, 44 FLRA 1548, 1555-56 (1992); U.S. Department of the Army, New Cumberland Army Depot, New Cumberland, Pennsylvania and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2004, 40 FLRA 186, 193-94 (1991); U.S. Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, Plant Protection and Quarantine, Hyattsville, Maryland and National Association of Agriculture Employees, 38 FLRA 1291, 1299 (1991); U.S. Department of Defense, Marine Corps Logistics Base, Barstow, California and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1492, 37 FLRA 796, 797 (1990) (Marine Corps Logistics Base). As we held in Mari