United States, Department of Labor, Assistant Secretary For Employment Standards (Petitioner) and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2562 (Respondent/Labor Organization)
[ v60 p223 ]
60 FLRA No. 47
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR
OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
DECISION AND ORDER
September 9, 2004
I. Statement of the Case
This matter is before the Authority on a petition for enforcement of a decision and order of the Assistant Secretary for Employment Standards, United States Department of Labor (Assistant Secretary), pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2428.2 and 29 C.F.R. § 458.92. [*] No opposition to the petition was filed. For the reasons that follow, we enforce the Assistant Secretary's decision and order, as modified consistent with the Assistant Secretary's request.
II. Background and Assistant Secretary's Decision
The District Director, Office of Labor-Management Standards, Employment Standards Administration, Department of Labor filed a complaint alleging that AFGE, Local 2562 (the Respondent) failed to file annual financial reports for fiscal years 1999, 2000 and 2001, as required by 5 U.S.C. § 7120(c) and 29 C.F.R. §§ 403.2, 403.4(a)(2), 403.6 and 458.3. An administrative law judge (ALJ) for the Department of Labor issued a Notice of Docketing, which pertinently provided that the Respondent was required to file an answer within twenty days after the service of the complaint under 29 C.F.R. § 458.68, and that a hearing would be scheduled after receipt of the Respondent's answer. When the Respondent failed to file an answer, the ALJ ordered the Respondent to show cause why a default judgment should not be entered under 29 C.F.R. § 18.6(d)(2)(v). The Respondent failed to respond to the order, and the ALJ issued a recommended decision that, as relevant here, the Respondent should be directed to file financial reports for fiscal years 1999, 2000, and 2001 and cease and desist from failing to comply timely with reporting requirements and from further violating 29 C.F.R. § 458.3.
When no exceptions were filed to the ALJ's recommended decision, the Assistant Secretary issued a decision, in which the Assistant Secretary stated that under 29 C.F.R. § 458.68(b), the failure to file an answer constitutes an admission of the allegation. The Assistant Secretary also stated that, under 29 C.F.R. § 458.71, the admission of an allegation constitutes a waiver of hearing and results in the ALJ's adoption of the material allegations in the complaint. Accordingly, the Assistant Secretary ordered the Respondent to file financial reports for fiscal years 1999, 2000 and 2001, and cease and desist from failing to comply timely with the reporting requirements.
III. Assistant Secretary's Petition for Enforcement
The Assistant Secretary filed a petition for enforcement with the Authority pursuant to 5 C.F.R. § 2428.2 and 29 C.F.R. § 458.92, alleging that the Respondent has failed to comply with the Assistant Secretary's decision and order and has also failed to file its financial reports for fiscal years 2002 and 2003. The Assistant Secretary requests that the Authority issue an order enforcing the Assistant Secretary's decision, and that the Authority order "expressly include a mandate that the Respondent comply with any and all overdue reporting requirements." Petition at 4 n.2. Although the Authority's Office of Case Control issued a notice informing the Respondent of its right to file an opposition to the petition, the Respondent did not file an opposition.
IV. Analysis and Conclusions
The Authority's Regulations provide that "[a] decision and order of the Assistant Secretary shall be enforced unless it is arbitrary and capricious or based upon manifest disregard of the law." 5 C.F.R. § 2428.3(a). The Authority's Regulations also provide that the Authority "shall issue its decision on the case enforcing, enforcing as modified, refusing to enforce, or remanding the decision and order of the Assistant Secretary." 5 C.F.R. § 2428.3(b).
The Respondent did not file an opposition to the Assistant Secretary's petition. Further, the record provides no basis for concluding that the Assistant Secretary's [ v60 p224 ] decision is arbitrary and capricious or based upon a manifest disregard of the law. Although the Assistant Secretary's decision directed the Respondent to file the reports for fiscal years 1999, 2000 and 2001 and to cease and desist from failing to comply timely with the reporting requirements, it is undisputed that the Respondent has failed to file its reports for fiscal years 2002 and 2003. Accordingly, and noting again that the Respondent filed no opposition to the petition, it is appropriate for the Authority to grant the Assistant Secretary's request that the Authority "expressly . . . mandate that the Respondent comply with any and all overdue reporting requirements." Petition at 4 n.2. In this connection, as noted above, the Authority's Regulations permit the Authority to enforce the Assistant Secretary's decisions "as modified[.]" 5 C.F.R. § 2428.3(b).
The Assistant Secretary's decision is