18:0033(4)AR - AFGE Local 1917 and INS, Justice -- 1985 FLRAdec AR
[ v18 p33 ]
18:0033(4)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
18 FLRA No. 4
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1917
Union
and
UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND
NATURALIZATION SERVICE, U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Agency
Case No. 0-AR-478
DECISION
This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to the award of
Arbitrator Thomas G. S. Christensen filed by the Agency under section
7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and
part 2425 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. /1/
The dispute in this matter concerns the grievants' entitlement under
8 U.S.C. 1353(a) /2/ to extra compensation for night (5 p.m. to 8 a.m.)
overtime work. /3/ The grievants were hired as intermittent, WAE (When
Actually Employed) Immigration Inspectors depending upon the needs of
the Agency. The dispute arose when the grievants were notified that
they were being rescheduled from full-time, 40-hour a week shifts to
part-time, 18-hour a week shifts, and that as a result, they would no
longer receive extra compensation under 5 U.S.C. 1353(a) for night
overtime but, rather, would receive regular overtime pay under 5 U.S.C.
5542 /4/ for such work.
The Arbitrator first rejected the Agency's argument that the dispute
was not arbitrable under the parties' agreement and that the Arbitrator
was without authority to resolve the dispute, assertedly because the
negotiated grievance procedure excluded from coverage any matter nor
subject to management's control and that this matter was controlled by
law. The Arbitrator found that the Agency's argument was untimely
raised under the agreement and, furthermore, that included within the
definition of grievance in the agreement was any claimed violation,
misinterpretation or misapplication of any law, rule or regulation
affecting conditions of employment. On the merits, the Arbitrator
determined that the payment of extra overtime compensation under 8
U.S.C. 1353(a) is not conditioned on whether the employee works
full-time or part-time, but, rather whether the employee is assigned to
a regularly scheduled shift. As his award, the Arbitrator in effect
directed the Agency to pay part-time inspectors on regularly scheduled
shifts extra compensation under 8 U.S.C. 1353(a) for night overtime and
to make whole any part-time inspector who had been denied such
compensation.
In its exceptions, the Agency first contends that the Arbitrator
erred and exceeded his authority by finding that the instant dispute was
arbitrable since it is specifically controlled by law. However, the
Agency has failed to establish that the award is deficient. Thus, the
grievance is clearly within the coverage of the grievance procedure
prescribed by the Statute. See, e.g., American Federation of Government
Employees, AFL-CIO, National Council of EEOC Locals and Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission, 10 FLRA 3 (1982) (proposal 1), enforced sub nom.
EEOC v. FLRA, No. 82-2310 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 21, 1984). The Authority
concludes that this exception constitutes nothing more than disagreement
with the Arbitrator's interpretation and application of the parties'
collective bargaining agreement and consequently provides no basis for
finding the award deficient. E.g., Veterans Administration Hines
Hospital and Illinois Nurses Association, Hines Unit, 13 FLRA 131
(1983); San Antonio Air Logistics Center, Kelly Air Force Base, San
Antonio, Texas and American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO,
Local 1617, 9 FLRA 378 (1982).
In another exception, the Agency contends that the award is contrary
to 8 U.S.C. 1353(a). The Authority agrees. It has been expressly
decided that intermittent, part-time Immigration Inspectors are not
entitled to additional compensation for night overtime under 8 U.S.C.
1353(a), since that provision applies only to night overtime performed
by full-time employees working regular tours of duty. 49 Comp. Gen. 577
(1977). Additionally, the Comptroller General has ruled that part-time
employees are not entitled to the extra compensation even if they are
working regularly scheduled shifts, B-197533 (July 1, 1980). Thus, in
terms of this case, the Arbitrator's award directing that the
intermittent, part-time Immigration Inspector grievants be paid the
extra compensation for night overtime is clearly contrary to 8 U.S.C.
1353(a).
Accordingly, the Arbitrator's award is set aside. /5/ Issued,
Washington, D.C., May 14, 1985
Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
Chairman
William J. McGinnis, Jr., Member
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ The Office of Personnel Management (OPM) filed a brief as an
amicus curiae in this case and the Union filed an opposition to the
Agency's exceptions and a response to OPM's brief.
/2/ 8 U.S.C. 1353(a) provides, in pertinent part:
The Attorney General shall fix a reasonable rate of extra
compensation for overtime services of immigration officers and
employees of the Immigration and Naturalization Service who may be
required to remain on duty between the hours of five o'clock
postmeridian and eight o'clock antemeridian . . . such rates to be
fixed on a basis of one-half day's additional pay for each two
hours or fraction thereof of at least one hour that the overtime
extends beyond five o'clock postmeridian (but not to exceed two
and one-half days' pay for the full period from five o'clock
postmeridian to eight o'clock antemeridian) . . . .
/3/ The grievants' entitlement to extra compensation under 8 U.S.C.
1353(a) for work on Sundays and holidays is not an issue in this matter.
/4/ 5 U.S.C. 5542 provides, in pertinent part:
(a) For full-time, part-time and intermittent tours of duty,
hours of work officially ordered or approved in excess of 40 hours
in an administrative workweek, or . . . in excess of 8 hours in a
day, performed by an employee are overtime work and shall be paid
for . . . at the following rates:
(1) For an employee whose basic pay is at a rate which does not
exceed the minimum rate of basic pay for GS-10, the overtime
hourly rate of pay is an amount equal to one and one-half times
the hourly rate of basic pay of the employee, and all that amount
is premium pay.
(2) For an employee whose basic pay is at a rate which exceeds
the minimum rate of basic pay for GS-10, the overtime hourly rate
of pay is an amount equal to one and one-half times the hourly
rate of the minimum rate of basic pay for GS-10, and all that
amount is premium pay.
/5/ In view of this decision, it is not necessary to address the
Agency's other exceptions to the award.