23:0420(61)AR - NTEU Chapter 49 and IRS, Indianapolis District -- 1986 FLRAdec AR
[ v23 p420 ]
23:0420(61)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
23 FLRA No. 61
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION
CHAPTER 49
Union
and
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
INDIANAPOLIS DISTRICT
Activity
Case No. 0-AR-1199
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
I. STATEMENT OF THE CASE
This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to a ruling of
Arbitrator Alvin L. Goldman filed by the Activity under section 7122(a)
of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425
of the Authority's Rules and Regulations.
II. ARBITRATOR'S AWARD
The matter submitted to arbitration concerned the grievant's
reduction in grade for unacceptable performance under 5 U.S.C. Section
4303. Before considering the merits of the grievance, the Arbitrator
issued a final ruling and opinion on the Union's motion to require the
Activity to make a prehearing disclosure of certain documents and
information. The Arbitrator essentially sustained the motion and
ordered the Activity to produce a substantial portion of the material
requested. The Activity's exceptions in this case are to the
Arbitrator's final ruling on the motion.
III. ANALYSIS AND CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that we are without jurisdiction to review the Activity's
exceptions. We find, apart from any consideration of whether a
challenge to the ruling is interlocutory, that the ruling on the Union's
motion is not separate and distinct from the matter of the grievant's
reduction in grade. Section 7122(a) of the Statute pertinently
provides:
Either party to arbitration under this chapter may file with
the Authority an exception to any arbitrator's award pursuant to
the arbitration (other than an award relating to a matter
described in section 7121(f) of this title).
As relevant to this case, the matters described in section 7121(f) of
the Statute include those covered under 5 U.S.C. Section 4303 which
applies to a reduction in grade for unacceptable performance. Review of
an arbitration award relating to such matters must be obtained in the
same manner and under the same conditions as if the matter involved had
been decided by the Merit Systems Protection Board. Department of
Defense Dependents Schools, Pacific Region and Overseas Education
Association, 16 FLRA 34 (1984).
Because we find that the Arbitrator's final ruling on the Union's
motion relates to a matter covered by section 4303, exceptions to the
award may not be filed with the Authority under section 7122(a) of the
Statute. See Headquarters, Department of the Army, Washington, D.C. and
U.S. Army Training Center Engineer and Fort Leonard Wood, Fort Leonard
Wood, Missouri, 22 FLRA No. 71 (1986), slip op. at 5 n.2 and Veterans
Administration Medical Center, Hines, Illinois and Illinois Nurses
Association, Hines Local Unit, 20 FLRA No. 61 (1985). In VA Medical
Center, Hines, Illinois, the Authority found that a supplemental award
of attorney fees was not separate and distinct from the original award
which related to a matter described in section 7121(f) of the Statute.
Consequently, the Authority ruled that it was without jurisdiction to
resolve the exceptions to the award of attorney fees and the exceptions
were dismissed.
IV. DECISION
Accordingly, the Activity's exceptions are dismissed.
Issued, Washington, D.C., September 25, 1986.
/s/ Jerry L. Calhoun, Chairman
/s/ Henry B. Frazier III, Member
/s/ Jean McKee, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY