19:0322(45)AR - Labor and National Council of Field Labor Locals, AFGE -- 1985 FLRAdec AR
[ v19 p322 ]
19:0322(45)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
19 FLRA No. 45
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Agency
and
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF FIELD
LABOR LOCALS, AMERICAN FEDERATION
OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Union
Case No. O-AR-846
DECISION
This matter is before the Authority on an exception to the award of
Arbitrator Martin Lubow filed by the Agency under section 7122(a) of the
Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425 of the
Authority's Rules and Regulations.
The grievance in this case concerned the Agency's obligation to
distribute Union materials through the internal mail system under the
terms of the parties' collective bargaining agreement. As part of the
grievance, the Arbitrator addressed the issue of "(t)o what extent must
the (Agency) accept obviously 'political' material for (d)istribution."
In this respect, the Arbitrator, for example, questioned whether the
Agency would have to accept for internal mail distribution a union
leader "endorsement of an opposition candidate for president or urg(ing
of) the defeat of a particular Congressman." Pursuant to his application
of the terms of the parties' agreement, the Arbitrator ruled that these
and similar such matters must be accepted by the Agency for distribution
and that "political" matters have not been barred from distribution in
this context. Accordingly, in this respect the Arbitrator ordered that
future submissions shall be evaluated in a manner consistent with these
principles.
In its exception the Agency contends that the award is contrary to
provisions of the Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7324, /1/ and implementing
regulations, 5 CFR 733. In support, the Agency principally argues that
the activity addressed by the Arbitrator in the context of directing
that associated political materials must be distributed by the Agency is
partisan political activity proscribed by the Hatch Act and implementing
regulations and that consequently by directing the distribution of
materials associated with such activity and similar partisan political
activity, the award is deficient. The Authority agrees.
The Hatch Act, 5 U.S.C. 7321-7327, specifically prohibits certain
partisan political activity on the part of Federal employees. U.S.
Civil Service Commission v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 413
U.S. 548 (1973). Among the activities prohibited by the Act are
"(e)ndorsing or opposing a candidate for public office in a partisan
election or a candidate for political party office in a political
advertisement, a broadcast, campaign, literature, or similar material."
5 CFR 733.122(b)(10). Because the Arbitrator in effect has ordered the
distribution by the Agency of materials associated with such proscribed
political activity, the Authority finds that the award is deficient
under the Statute. Specifically, the Authority concludes that the award
is deficient as inconsistent with the Hatch Act and implementing
regulations because it effectively mandates that the Agency use official
authority to facilitate proscribed political activity and associated
materials by distributing through the Agency's internal mail system such
political materials.
Accordingly, the award is modified by striking the second sentence.
Issued, Washington, D.C. July 26, 1985
Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
Chairman
William J. McGinnis, Jr., Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ 5 U.S.C. 7324 pertinently provides:
(a) An employee in an Executive agency or an individual
employed by the government of the District of Columbia may not--
(1) use his official authority or influence for the purpose of
interfering with or affecting the result of an election; or
(2) take an active part in political management or in political
campaigns.