[ v02 p912 ]
02:0912(114)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
2 FLRA No. 114 MR. DONALD M. HAINES LABOR RELATIONS SPECIALIST CONTRACT AND APPEALS DIVISION AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO 1325 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005 RE: AFGE, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 3488 AND FEDERAL DEPOSIT INS. CORP., NEW YORK REG. OFFICE Case No. 0-NG-192 DEAR MR. HAINES: THIS REFERS TO YOUR OCTOBER 25, 1979 PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE ACTIVITY'S ALLEGATION OF NONNEGOTIABILITY IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED CASE; AND TO YOUR DECEMBER 7, 1979 REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF AN EXPIRED TIME LIMIT. IN YOUR PETITION OF OCTOBER 25, 1979, YOU STATE THAT THE SUBJECT ALLEGATION DATED OCTOBER 5, 1979, WAS SERVED UPON YOUR UNION ON OCTOBER 11, 1979. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 7117(C)(2)(A) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE AND SECTION 2424.3 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE, ANY PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THAT ALLEGATION WAS DUE IN THE OFFICE OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN THE CLOSE OF BUSINESS ON OCTOBER 26, 1979. YOUR PETITION WAS FILED ON OCTOBER 29, 1979. AS TO YOUR DECEMBER 7, 1979 WAIVER REQUEST, SECTION 2429.23(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES PROVIDES THAT AN EXPIRED TIME LIMIT IN A CASE SUCH AS THE INSTANT ONE MAY WAIVED IN "EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES." THE REASON YOU CITE IN YOUR REQUEST IS THAT YOUR PETITION WAS INADVERTENTLY SENT BY MAIL INSTEAD OF BEING HAND DELIVERED ON OCTOBER 25, 1979, AND AS A RESULT, THE AUTHORITY DID NOT RECEIVE THE PETITION UNTIL OCTOBER 29, 1979. IN OUR OPINION, SUCH REASON DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN "EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCE" WITHIN THE MEANING OF SECTION 2429.23(B) OF THE RULES. ACCORDINGLY, YOUR REQUEST FOR A WAIVER MUST BE DENIED. MOREOVER, AS TO YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW, SINCE THE PETITION WAS UNTIMELY FILED, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, IT IS HEREBY DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. SINCERELY, SAMUEL A. CHAITOVITZ EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR CC: J. S. ARNOLD FDIC