General Services Administration, Region 4, Atlanta, Georgia (Activity) and National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1766 (Petitioner)
[ v03 p175 ]
03:0175(23)CU
The decision of the Authority follows:
3 FLRA No. 23
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
REGION 4, ATLANTA, GEORGIA
Activity
and
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1766
Petitioner
Case No. 4-CU-4
DECISION AND ORDER CLARIFYING UNIT
UPON A PETITION DULY FILED UNDER SEC. 7111(B)(2) OF THE FEDERAL
SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE, A HEARING WAS HELD BEFORE
HEARING OFFICER BRENDA GREEN. THE HEARING OFFICER'S RULINGS MADE AT THE
HEARING ARE FREE FROM PREJUDICIAL ERROR AND ARE HEREBY AFFIRMED.
UPON THE ENTIRE RECORD IN THE SUBJECT CASE, THE AUTHORITY FINDS:
THE PETITIONER SEEKS TO CLARIFY AN EXISTING EXCLUSIVELY RECOGNIZED
UNIT OF GUARDS AND FEDERAL PROTECTIVE OFFICERS (FPO'S) EMPLOYED BY THE
ACTIVITY /1/ TO INCLUDE 14 EMPLOYEES CURRENTLY CLASSIFIED AS SUPERVISORY
FEDERAL PROTECTIVE OFFICERS, GS-6 (CORPORALS), CONTENDING THAT THESE
EMPLOYEES ARE NOT SUPERVISORS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SEC. 7103(A)(10) OF
THE STATUTE. THE ACTIVITY CONTENDS THAT THE INCUMBENTS IN THE SUBJECT
CLASSIFICATION ARE SUPERVISORS WITHIN THE MEANING OF SEC. 7103(A)(10) OF
THE STATUTE AND, ON THIS BASIS, OPPOSES THEIR INCLUSION IN THE CERTIFIED
UNIT.
THE CORPORALS ARE ASSIGNED TO THE FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE DIVISION
(FPSD), WHICH IS ONE OF SEVERAL DIVISIONS WITHIN THE ACTIVITY. THE FPSD
IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE SECURITY AND SAFETY OF THE PROPERTY, PERSONS,
BUILDINGS, AND GROUNDS UNDER THE CHARGE AND CONTROL OF THE ACTIVITY.
THE GUARDS AND FPO'S INCLUDING THE GS-6 CORPORALS, ARE STATIONED
THROUGHOUT CITIES IN REGION 4 WHICH ENCOMPASSES THE STATES THROUGHOUT
THE DEEP SOUTH AND THE SOUTHEAST.
THE RECORD REVEALS THAT THE CORPORALS IN QUESTION FALL INTO TWO
DISTINCT CATEGORIES; THOSE WHO ARE THE SENIOR OFFICERS ON DUTY AT THEIR
PARTICULAR INSTALLATION, AND THOSE WHO ARE STATIONED IN INSTALLATIONS
WHERE A SERGEANT IS THE SENIOR OFFICER. AS A CONSEQUENCE, THE DUTIES,
RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY OF THE CORPORALS VARY UPON WHETHER OR NOT
THEY ARE THE SENIOR OFFICER AT THEIR INSTALLATION. CORPORALS ARE THE
SENIOR OFFICERS AT TEN LOCATIONS AND SERVE UNDER A SERGEANT AT FOUR
OTHERS.
ALL CORPORALS PERFORM CERTAIN DUTIES REGARDLESS OF THE LOCATION OF
THEIR ASSIGNMENTS. THE RECORD INDICATES THAT THE MAJOR FUNCTION OF ALL
CORPORALS IS THE PRESERVATION OF SECURITY AND SAFETY AT HIS/HER POST.
IN ADDITION, ALL CORPORALS CARRY OUT CERTAIN ADMINISTRATIVE FUNCTIONS
SUCH AS THE PREPARATION OF MONTHLY SHIFT ASSIGNMENTS, WHETHER OR NOT
THEY ARE THE SENIOR OFFICER.
THE RECORD REVEALS, HOWEVER, THAT SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES EXIST IN
THE AUTHORITY EXERTED BY CORPORALS SERVING AS SENIOR OFFICERS AS
COMPARED TO THEIR COUNTERPARTS STATIONED AT INSTALLATIONS HEADED BY
SERGEANTS. CORPORALS ACTING AS SENIOR OFFICERS CONSISTENTLY EXERCISE
INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT IN PERFORMING THEIR WORK. THEY HAVE SIGNIFICANT
IMPACT UPON THE HIRING DECISIONS OF THE ACTIVITY, IN THAT THEY REGULARLY
INTERVIEW PROSPECTIVE EMPLOYEES, (OFTEN TRAVELING TO CONDUCT THESE
INTERVIEWS), AND THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS EFFECTIVELY DETERMINE THE FINAL
HIRING DECISION OF THE AGENCY. SENIOR CORPORALS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR
ASSIGNING AND DIRECTING DUTIES OF THE FPO'S (GS-5) AND GUARDS UNDER
THEIR COMMAND. THEY REGULARLY VISIT OTHER OFFICES WITHIN THEIR
JURISDICTION FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIEWING ONGOING OPERATIONS.
FURTHERMORE, THE SENIOR CORPORALS HAVE A MAJOR ROLE IN ADMINISTERING THE
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE AND THE AUTHORITY TO INITIATE DISCIPLINE. THEY HAVE
THE FINAL AUTHORITY TO IMPLEMENT A SETTLEMENT OF A GRIEVANCE IF THE
SETTLEMENT IS ACCEPTABLE TO THE EMPLOYEE. IN ADDITION, THE SENIOR
CORPORALS RECOMMEND DISCIPLINARY ACTIONS DIRECTLY TO THE SUPERVISORY
LIEUTENANTS. THE RECORD INDICATES THAT THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
REGULARLY ACCEPTED AND FOLLOWED. THEY ALSO HAVE A MAJOR ROLE IN
DETERMINING PROMOTIONS. BOTH THEIR PERSONNEL EVALUATIONS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS ARE EFFECTIVE IN DETERMINING THE PROMOTIONAL DECISIONS
OF THE ACTIVITY. ACCORDINGLY, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT CORPORALS
SERVING AS SENIOR OFFICERS AT THEIR PARTICULAR INSTALLATIONS IN GENERAL
SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, REGION 4, ARE SUPERVISORS AS DEFINED UNDER SEC.
7103(A)(10) OF THE STATUTE, AND WILL THUS BE EXCLUDED FROM THE
BARGAINING UNIT.
THE RECORD FURTHER DISCLOSES THAT THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF
CORPORALS SITUATED IN INSTALLATIONS HEADED BY SENIOR SERGEANTS IS
EXTREMELY LIMITED. THERE IS NO INDICATION THAT THEY CONSISTENTLY
EXERCISE INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT IN THE PERFORMANCE OF THEIR DUTIES. THESE
CORPORALS HAVE NO ROLE IN THE HIRING PROCEDURE. ADDITIONALLY, THEY HAVE
NO AUTHORITY TO PROMOTE, LITTLE IF ANY JURISDICTION OVER ASSIGNMENTS, NO
ROLE IN THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE, AND THEIR AUTHORITY TO DISCIPLINE IS
LIMITED TO MAKING RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE SENIOR SERGEANT. THEIR
ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES ARE FEW, AND ARE ROUTINE AND CLERICAL IN TRAINING
SESSIONS FOR OTHER FPO'S AND GUARDS. MOREOVER, THE RECORD REVEALS THAT
THE ACTIVITY ITSELF RECOGNIZES THAT THE SUPERVISORY AUTHORITY OF
CORPORALS SERVING UNDER SERGEANTS EXISTS ONLY IN THE ABSENCE OF THE
SENIOR SERGEANT AND IS NOT CONSISTENTLY EXERCISED. ACCORDINGLY, THE
AUTHORITY FINDS THAT CORPORALS SERVING AT INSTALLATIONS IN GENERAL
SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, REGION 4, IN WHICH A SERGEANT IS STATIONED AND
ACTS AS THE SENIOR OFFICER ARE NOT SUPERVISORS AND WILL BE INCLUDED
WITHIN THE BARGAINING UNIT.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE UNIT SOUGHT TO BE CLARIFIED, IN WHICH
EXCLUSIVE RECOGNITION WAS GRANTED TO THE NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1766, ON DECEMBER 6, 1977, AT THE GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION, REGION 4, ATLANTA, GEORGIA, BE AND HEREBY IS, CLARIFIED
BY GS-6 (CORPORAL), WHO IS ASSIGNED TO A LOCATION WHICH ALSO INCLUDES A
SUPERVISORY FEDERAL PROTECTIVE OFFICER, GS-7 (SERGEANT). THE UNIT IS
FURTHER CLARIFIED BY EXCLUDING FROM SAID UNIT THE POSITION OF
SUPERVISORY FEDERAL PROTECTIVE OFFICER, GS-6 (CORPORAL), WHO IS ASSIGNED
TO A LOCATION WHERE HE/SHE SERVES AS THE SENIOR OFFICER IN THAT
LOCATION.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MAY 8, 1980
RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN
HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER
LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
/1/ THE PETITIONER WAS CERTIFIED AS THE EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE IN
THE UNIT INVOLVED ON DECEMBER 6, 1977.