American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1931, AFL-CIO (Union) and Naval Weapons Station, Concord, California (Activity)
[ v04 p18 ]
04:0018(4)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
04 FLRA No. 4
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
LOCAL 1931, AFL-CIO
Union
and
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION,
CONCORD, CALIFORNIA
Activity
Case No. O-AR-30
DECISION ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY ON A MOTION FILED BY THE UNION
FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE AUTHORITY'S DECISION IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED
CASE.
IN THIS CASE THE ARBITRATOR FOUND THAT THE ACTIVITY HAD VIOLATED THE
PARTIES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BY UNILATERALLY IMPOSING
RESTRICTIONS ON THE UNION'S USE OF OFFICIAL TIME FOR REPRESENTATIONAL
FUNCTIONS. AS A REMEDY, THE ARBITRATOR ORDERED THE ACTIVITY TO
REIMBURSE THE UNION FOR ANY MONEY IT PAID TO UNION REPRESENTATIVES FOR
THE TIME THEY SPENT ON REPRESENTATIONAL FUNCTIONS BEYOND WHAT THE
ACTIVITY ALLOWED FOR THE PERIOD FEBRUARY 24, 1977 THROUGH DECEMBER 15,
1977.
THE UNION FILED AN EXCEPTION TO THE AWARD, CONTENDING THAT IT WAS
DEFICIENT BECAUSE THE ARBITRATOR LIMITED THE REMEDY TO THE PERIOD ENDING
DECEMBER 15, 1977, THE DATE ON WHICH THE PARTIES' COLLECTIVE BARGAINING
AGREEMENT HAD EXPIRED. THE UNION ARGUED THAT THE REMEDY SHOULD HAVE
EXTENDED TO JANUARY 30, 1979, THE DATE ON WHICH THE FEDERAL SERVICE
IMPASSES PANEL ISSUED A DECISION RESOLVING THE PARTIES' IMPASSE OVER THE
OFFICIAL TIME PROVISIONS IN THEIR NEW COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT.
THE AUTHORITY DETERMINED IN 4 FLRA NO. 4 (1980) THAT THE UNION'S
EXCEPTION AND SUPPORTING ARGUMENTS PROVIDED NO BASIS FOR FINDING THE
AWARD DEFICIENT. THE AUTHORITY REJECTED THE UNION'S CONTENTION THAT A
PARTICULAR FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS COUNCIL UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICE
DECISION /1/ WAS APPLICABLE TO THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD WHICH FASHIONED A
REMEDY FOR THE PARTICULAR CONTRACT VIOLATION FOUND BY THE ARBITRATOR.
INSTEAD, THE AUTHORITY FOUND THAT THE UNION WAS DISAGREEING WITH THE
REASONING EMPLOYED BY THE ARBITRATOR IN ARRIVING AT A REMEDY IN THE
SPECIFIC CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE BEFORE HIM AND THAT SUCH DISAGREEMENT
PROVIDED NO BASIS FOR FINDING AN AWARD DEFICIENT.
IN ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, THE UNION "TAKES EXCEPTION TO THE
CONCLUSION REACHED BY THE ARBITRATOR" WHICH LIMITED THE REMEDY SOUGHT BY
THE UNION AND CITES TWO AUTHORITY DECISIONS IN WHICH THE AUTHORITY
AFFIRMED ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES' FINDINGS OF UNFAIR LABOR PRACTICES.
/2/
HOWEVER, THE SUBSTANCE OF THE ARGUMENT SET FORTH BY THE UNION IN ITS
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS PRECISELY THE SAME ARGUMENT THE AUTHORITY
REJECTED IN DENYING THE UNION'S EXCEPTION IN 4 FLRA NO. 4. THUS, THE
UNION IS DISAGREEING WITH THE REASONING EMPLOYED BY THE ARBITRATOR IN
FASHIONING A REMEDY FOR THE PARTICULAR CONTRACT VIOLATION HE FOUND AND
NEITHER OF THE TWO AUTHORITY DECISIONS CITED BY THE UNION PROVIDES A
BASIS FOR NOW REACHING A CONTRARY RESULT FROM THAT REACHED IN 4 FLRA NO.
4.
THUS, THE UNION IN ITS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION HAS NOT RAISED ANY
MATTER NOT PREVIOUSLY CONSIDERED AND CORRECTLY DECIDED BY THE AUTHORITY
AND HAS NOT PRESENTED ANY OTHER PERSUASIVE REASONS TO WARRANT REOPENING
OR RECONSIDERING THE DECISION IN THIS CASE. ACCORDINGLY, THE UNION'S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION IS DENIED.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., MARCH 24, 1982
RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN
HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER
LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ THE UNION CITED INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, OGDEN SERVICE CENTER,
ET AL. AND THE NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, ET AL., 6 FLRC 310
(MAR. 17, 1978).
/2/ THE UNION CITES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, 35TH COMBAT SUPPORT
GROUP (TAC), GEORGE AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA AND NATIONAL FEDERATION
OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 977, 4 FLRA NO. 5 (1980) AND DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE, DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NAVAL ORDNANCE STATION LOUISVILLE,
KENTUCKY AND LOCAL LODGE 830, INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS
AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, AFL-CIO, 4 FLRA NO. 100 (1980).