National Treasury Employees Union, Chapter 208 (Union) and Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (Agency)
[ v04 p215 ]
04:0215(31)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
4 FLRA No. 31
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES
UNION, CHAPTER 208
Union
and
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION,
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Agency
Case No. O-MC-5
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION
IN A PETITION FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY, CHAPTER 208, NATIONAL
TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (THE UNION) SEEKS REVIEW OF AN ISSUE THAT AROSE
IN CONNECTION WITH THE PROCESSING OF A GRIEVANCE UNDER A NEGOTIATED
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE UNION AND THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION (THE
AGENCY). BASED UPON THE UNION'S SUBMISSION, IT APPEARS THAT THE AGENCY
DENIED A GRIEVANCE (RELATED TO A LIFE INSURANCE COVERAGE AND PREMIUM
PAYMENT DISPUTE) AT THE FIRST STEP OF THE PARTIES' NEGOTIATED GRIEVANCE
PROCEDURE ON THE GROUND THAT THE MATTER WAS NONGRIEVABLE, BECAUSE IT WAS
SPECIFICALLY EXCLUDED FROM GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE COVERAGE BY SECTION
7121(C)(2) OF THE STATUTE. /1/ ON APPEAL AT THE SECOND STEP OF THE
GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE, IT FURTHER APPEARS THAT THE AGENCY ADVISED THE
UNION THAT SINCE THE DETERMINATION THAT THE MATTER WAS NONGRIEVABLE WAS
BASED ON THE AGENCY'S VIEW THAT IT WAS NONNEGOTIABLE, THE UNION'S
RECOURSE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION G(1) OF THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT, /2/
WAS NOT TO THE SECOND LEVEL OFFICIAL, BUT RATHER, TO THE FEDERAL LABOR
RELATIONS AUTHORITY. THE UNION THEREUPON FILED THE INSTANT PETITION
WITH THE AUTHORITY.
SECTION 2424.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE (5 C.F.R.
2424.1(1980)), GOVERNING REVIEW OF NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES, PROVIDES THAT
THE AUTHORITY WILL CONSIDER A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE UNDER THE CONDITIONS
PRESCRIBED THEREIN (AS RELEVANT HERE, IF AN AGENCY INVOLVED IN
COLLECTIVE BARGAINING WITH AN EXCLUSIVE REPRESENTATIVE ALLEGES THAT THE
DUTY TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH DOES NOT EXTEND TO ANY MATTER PROPOSED TO
BE BARGAINED).
THE CIRCUMSTANCES DESCRIBED IN THE UNION'S PETITION DO NOT GIVE RISE
TO A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE WHICH THE AUTHORITY MAY PROPERLY REVIEW UNDER
SECTION 2424.1 OF ITS RULES OF PROCEDURE. THAT IS, THE PARTIES WERE NOT
INVOLVED IN COLLECTIVE BARGAINING WHEN THE INSTANT DISPUTE AROSE; THE
UNION DID NOT PROPOSE THAT A PARTICULAR MATTER BE BARGAINED; NOR DID
THE AGENCY ALLEGE THAT ITS DUTY TO BARGAIN DID NOT EXTEND TO SUCH
MATTER. RATHER, AS ALREADY INDICATED, THE DISPUTE AROSE DURING THE
PROCESSING OF A GRIEVANCE, AND CONCERNED THE GRIEVABILITY OF THE MATTER
INVOLVED.
MOREOVER, UNDER SECTION 7121 OF THE STATUTE,
GRIEVABILITY/ARBITRABILITY QUESTIONS WHICH ARE NOT SATISFACTORILY
RESOLVED BY THE PARTIES UNDER NEGOTIATED GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES ARE
SUBJECT TO BINDING ARBITRATION. DETERMINATIONS BY AN ARBITRATOR ON SUCH
QUESTIONS ARE, OF COURSE, SUBJECT TO AUTHORITY REVIEW UPON THE FILING OF
EXCEPTIONS BY A PARTY TO THE PROCEEDING, PURSUANT TO SECTION 7122 OF THE
STATUTE AND PART 2425 OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.PART
2425(1980)).
FURTHER, REGARDING SECTION G(1) OF THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT PROVIDING
THAT THE UNION MAY APPEAL AGENCY DETERMINATIONS OF NONNEGOTIABILITY TO
THE AUTHORITY, SUCH IS WITHOUT ANY CONTROLLING EFFECT. THE JURISDICTION
OF THE AUTHORITY TO REVIEW NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES IS ESTABLISHED BY THE
STATUTE. THE EXERCISE OF THAT JURISDICTION, AS PROVIDED IN PART 2424 OF
THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF PROCEDURE, CANNOT IN ANY WAY BE EXPANDED BY AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE PARTIES TO A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT.
THEREFORE, THE CONTRACT PROVISION INVOLVED HERE IS WITHOUT FORCE OR
EFFECT AS TO THE AUTHORITY.
ACCORDINGLY, SINCE THE UNION'S PETITION FAILS TO MEET THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW UNDER SECTION 2424.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES OF
PROCEDURE,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S PETITION BE, AND IT HEREBY IS,
DISMISSED.
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., SEPTEMBER 12, 1980
SAMUEL A. CHAITOVITZ, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ 5 U.S.C. 7121(C)(2)(SUPP. II 1978). SECTION 7121(C) OF THE
STATUTE PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART:
THE PRECEDING SUBSECTIONS OF THIS SECTION SHALL NOT APPLY WITH
RESPECT TO ANY GRIEVANCE
CONCERNING . . . (2) RETIREMENT, LIFE INSURANCE, OR HEALTH INSURANCE
. . .
/2/ SECTION G(1) OF THE PARTIES' AGREEMENT PROVIDES, IN PART:
MANAGEMENT MAY ASSERT THAT A MATTER IS NON-GRIEVABLE OR
NON-ARBITRABLE BECAUSE IT IS
NON-NEGOTIABLE AT ANY STEP OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE. THE UNION MAY
APPEAL THE DETERMINATION
OF NON-NEGOTIABILITY TO THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY . . .