American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1170, AFL-CIO (Union) and Public Health Service Hospital, Seattle, Washington (Activity)
[ v07 p764 ]
07:0764(128)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
7 FLRA No. 128
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1170
(Union)
and
PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITAL,
SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
(Activity)
Case No. O-NG-503
ORDER DISMISSING NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL
THIS CASE IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E)
OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (5 U.S.C. 7101
ET SEQ.) ON A PETITION FOR REVIEW FILED BY THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1170 (THE UNION). FOR THE REASONS
INDICATED BELOW, THE UNION'S APPEAL MUST BE DISMISSED.
ON DECEMBER 10, 1981, THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITAL, SEATTLE,
WASHINGTON (THE ACTIVITY) FILED A MOTION TO DISMISS THE SUBJECT APPEAL.
IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION, THE ACTIVITY CONTENDS THAT IN A TRANSFER
EFFECTIVE NOVEMBER 20, 1981, CONTROL OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
HOSPITAL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON WAS PASSED FROM THE UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES TO THE SEATTLE PUBLIC HEALTH
SERVICE HOSPITAL PRESERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, A MUNICIPAL
CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON STATE. THE AGENCY FURTHER CONTENDS THAT SINCE
THE HOSPITAL IS NO LONGER A FEDERAL FACILITY, THE PRESENT CASE HAS BEEN
RENDERED MOOT, AND THAT THE AUTHORITY IS PRECLUDED BY SECTION 2429.10 OF
THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, WHICH PROHIBITS THE ISSUANCE OF
ADVISORY OPINIONS, FROM ISSUING A DECISION IN THIS CASE.
THE UNION DID NOT FILE ANY OPPOSITION TO THE ACTIVITY'S MOTION TO
DISMISS.
UPON CONSIDERATION OF THE AGENCY'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS, IT
HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE TRANSFER OF THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE
HOSPITAL, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON FROM FEDERAL GOVERNMENT CONTROL TO A
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF WASHINGTON STATE, REMOVED THE SUBJECT DISPUTE
FROM THE AUTHORITY'S JURISDICTION.
ACCORDINGLY, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE
BE, AND HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. /1/
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JANUARY 28, 1982
JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
--------------- FOOTNOTES: ---------------
/1/ IN SO DECIDING TO DISMISS THIS CASE, THE AUTHORITY MAKES NO
JUDGMENT ON THE NEGOTIABILITY OF THE PROPOSAL INVOLVED.