National Treasury Employees Union (Union) and Department of Health and Human Services, Region X, Seattle, Washington (Agency)
[ v07 p792 ]
07:0792(136)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
7 FLRA No. 136
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION
Union
and
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,
REGION X, SEATTLE, WASHINGTON
Agency
Case No. O-NG-371
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES
THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR
RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF
THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE),
AND INVOLVES THE NEGOTIABILITY OF THE FOLLOWING TWO UNION PROPOSALS.
UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD, INCLUDING THE PARTIES'
CONTENTIONS, THE AUTHORITY MAKES THE FOLLOWING DETERMINATIONS:
UNION PROPOSAL I
(A) EXPERIENCE, AS DEFINED FOR RATING AND RANKING PURPOSES WILL BE
NEGOTIATED FOR EACH
POSITION BETWEEN THE UNION AND MANAGEMENT. THE WEIGHT TO BE ASSIGNED
TO EACH EXPERIENCE
FACTOR WILL ALSO BE NEGOTIATED.
UNION PROPOSAL II
THE EMPLOYER HAS FIXED RATES FOR EXPERIENCE FACTORS. THE WEIGHT TO
BE ASSIGNED TO EACH
EXPERIENCE FACTOR WILL BE NEGOTIATED BETWEEN THE EMPLOYER AND THE
UNION WHENEVER THE EMPLOYER
CREATES A NEW POSITION, RECLASSIFIES A POSITION, AND/OR PROPOSES TO
CHANGE THE WEIGHT OF ANY
EXPERIENCE FACTOR OF ANY BARGAINING UNIT POSITION. THE UNION SHALL BE
SUPPLIED WITH THE
CURRENT WEIGHTS ASSIGNED EACH FACTOR OF EACH POSITION WITHIN 30 DAYS
FOLLOWING THE EFFECTIVE
DATE OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE PARTIES WILL NEGOTIATE THE WEIGHTS OF
EXPERIENCE FACTORS FOR
TWENTY (20) POSITIONS A YEAR AS SELECTED BY THE UNION.
THE AUTHORITY CONCLUDES THAT UNION PROPOSALS I AND II ARE NOT
SUFFICIENTLY SPECIFIC AND DELIMITED IN FORM AND CONTENT TO MEET THE
AUTHORITY'S CONDITIONS FOR REVIEW. IN NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1167 AND DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, HEADQUARTERS,
31ST COMBAT SUPPORT GROUP (TAC), HOMESTEAD AIR FORCE BASE, FLORIDA, 6
FLRA NO. 105(1981), THE AUTHORITY DISMISSED A UNION PETITION FOR REVIEW
OF A GENERAL PROPOSAL (PROPOSAL 5), LIKE UNION PROPOSALS I AND II
HEREIN, THAT SOUGHT TO NEGOTIATE WEIGHTS WHICH WOULD BE APPLIED, INTER
ALIA, TO EVALUATION FACTORS FOR PROMOTIONS. IN SO DOING, THE AUTHORITY
NOTED THAT THE PROPOSAL WAS NOT SUFFICIENTLY SPECIFIC AND DELIMITED IN
FORM AND CONTENT FOR THE AUTHORITY TO ISSUE A NEGOTIABILITY DECISION
THEREON BECAUSE IT FAILED TO SPECIFICALLY IDENTIFY PARTICULAR FACTORS,
METHODS, OR FORMS TO BE NEGOTIATED OR THE WEIGHTS TO BE APPLIED TO SUCH
FACTORS. ACCORD, NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION, CHAPTER 66 AND
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, KANSAS CITY
SERVICE CENTER, KANSAS CITY, MISSOURI, 2 FLRA 319(1979).
ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND
REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.10(1981)), IT IS ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S
PETITION FOR REVIEW BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JANUARY 29, 1982
RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN
HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER
LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY