National Treasury Employees Union and NTEU Chapter 70 (Union) and Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Atlanta Service Center, Georgia (Agency)
[ v08 p37 ]
08:0037(8)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
8 FLRA No. 8
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION
AND NTEU CHAPTER 70
Union
and
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
ATLANTA SERVICE CENTER, GEORGIA
Agency
Case No. 0-NG-354
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES
THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE FEDERAL LABOR
RELATIONS AUTHORITY (THE AUTHORITY) PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF
THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE),
AND RAISES THE QUESTION OF THE NEGOTIABILITY OF FIVE UNION PROPOSALS
DEALING WITH THE AGENCY'S DECISION TO INSTITUTE A CARPOOL PROJECT.
UNION PROPOSAL 1
IF A SITUATION DEVELOPS AMONG CARPOOLERS IN WHICH CERTAIN MEMBERS OF
THE POOL ARE ADVISED
THAT DUE TO A LACK OF WORK ON A PARTICULAR DAY THEY MUST LEAVE WORK,
THE EMPLOYER WILL MAKE A
GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO FIND THE EMPLOYEE(S) ALTERNATIVE WORK TO PERFORM
FOR THE REMAINDER OF
THEIR SHIFT. IF ALTERNATIVE WORK CANNOT BE FOUND, MANAGEMENT WILL
PROVIDE THAT EMPLOYEE(S)
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION HOME.
UNION PROPOSAL 2
ACTUAL MILEAGE PER GALLON OF THE CAR UTILIZED SHOULD BE CONSIDERED IN
DETERMINING WHO
RECEIVES A RESERVED PARKING SPACE. PEOPLE WHO DRIVE CARS WITH EPA
MILEAGE RATINGS OF 25 MILES
PER GALLON OR MORE WILL BE ENTITLED TO A RESERVED PARKING SPACE
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY
CARPOOL. HOWEVER, THESE INDIVIDUALS WILL ALSO BE ENCOURAGED TO
CARPOOL.
UNION PROPOSAL 3
PRIORITIES FOR RESERVED PARKING SPACES WILL BE ASSIGNED ACCORDING TO
THE FOLLOWING:
1. ACTUAL MILEAGE PER GALLON OF THE CAR UTILIZED SHOULD BE
CONSIDERED IN DETERMINING WHO
RECEIVES A RESERVED PARKING SPACE. PEOPLE WHO DRIVE CARS WITH EPA
MILEAGE RATINGS OF 25 MILES
PER GALLON OR MORE WILL BE ENTITLED TO A RESERVED PARKING SPACE
REGARDLESS OF WHETHER THEY
CARPOOL. HOWEVER, THESE INDIVIDUALS WILL ALSO BE ENCOURAGED TO
CARPOOL.
2. PRIORITY WILL BE GIVEN BASED ON THE NUMBER OF PEOPLE IN THE CAR
AND THE EPA MILEAGE PER
GALLON. THIS WILL BE DETERMINED BY CONSIDERING THE NUMBER OF
EMPLOYEES IN THE CARPOOL AND
DIVIDING THAT NUMBER BY THE EPA MILEAGE PER GALLON, TO DETERMINE THE
MILEAGE PER GALLON PER
INDIVIDUAL IN A CARPOOL. CARPOOLS WITH HIGHER MILEAGE PER GALLON PER
INDIVIDUAL WILL RECEIVE
PRIORITY OVER THOSE CARPOOLS WITH LESS MILEAGE PER INDIVIDUAL PER
GALLON. PRIORITY IS DEFINED
BY USING DISTANCE FROM THE BUILDING TO THE PARKING SPACE.
UNION PROPOSAL 4
IE: CARS GETTING EPA MILEAGE OF 25 MILES A GALLON OR MORE WILL BE
ASSIGNED TO RESERVED
SPACES CLOSEST TO BUILDING, THEN EPA MILEAGE AND NUMBER OF EMPLOYEES
IN CARPOOL WILL BE
ASSIGNED SPACES AFTER EPA MILEAGE OF 25 MILES OR MORE HAVE BEEN
ASSIGNED.
UNION PROPOSAL 5
PENALTIES IMPOSED BY THE CARPOOLING COMMITTEE REGARDING SUSPENSION OF
PARKING PRIVILEGES
WILL FIRST BE DISCUSSED WITH THE UNION.
UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD, INCLUDING THE
PARTIES' CONTENTIONS, THE AUTHORITY MAKES THE FOLLOWING DETERMINATIONS.
WITH RESPECT TO UNION PROPOSAL 1, A DISPUTE BETWEEN THE PARTIES EXISTS
AS A RESULT OF THE AGENCY'S CONTENTION THAT THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT DEAL
WITH MATTERS IMPACTED BY THE CARPOOL PROJECT. THUS, THE AUTHORITY FINDS
THAT THE DISPUTE WITH REGARD TO THIS PROPOSAL IS IMPROPERLY BEFORE US AS
A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE TO BE RESOLVED PURSUANT TO SECTION 7117 OF THE
STATUTE. RATHER, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROCESSED THROUGH THE UNFAIR LABOR
PRACTICE PROCEDURES OF THE STATUTE, SEE, E.G., AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1931 AND DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION, CONCORD, CALIFORNIA, 2 FLRA 181(1979); NATIONAL
TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION AND DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, U.S. CUSTOMS
SERVICE, WASHINGTON, D.C., 3 FLRA 330(1980).
UNION PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4 PROVIDE THAT RESERVED PARKING WILL BE
ALLOCATED ON THE BASIS OF ONE CRITERION, THAT IS, THE EPA MILEAGE RATING
OF THE AUTOMOBILE INVOLVED. IN CONTRAST, GOVERNMENT-WIDE REGULATIONS,
NAMELY, OMB CIRCULAR A-118 AND FPMR TEMPORARY REGULATION D-65 /1/
ESTABLISH THAT PARKING WILL BE ASSIGNED IN PRIORITY ORDER TO HANDICAPPED
EMPLOYEES, TO EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL AND OTHER INDIVIDUALS ASSIGNED UNUSUAL
HOURS, TO VANPOOLS AND TO CARPOOLS BASED SOLELY ON THE NUMBER OF CARPOOL
MEMBERS. THUS, CONTRARY TO THE UNION'S CONTENTION THAT THE PROPOSALS
ONLY WOULD AUGMENT GOVERNMENT-WIDE REGULATIONS, PROPOSALS 2, 3 AND 4, AS
DRAFTED, CONFLICT WITH THE AFOREMENTIONED GOVERNMENT-WIDE REGULATIONS
AND, THEREFORE, ARE NOT WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER SECTION
7117(A)(1) OF THE STATUTE. /2/ SEE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 2151 AND GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION, WASHINGTON, D.C., 7 FLRA NO. 79(1982).
FINALLY, WITH REGARD TO UNION PROPOSAL 5, THE UNION SEEKS ONLY TO
NEGOTIATE THE RIGHT TO DISCUSS THE PENALTIES TO BE IMPOSED PRIOR TO THE
IMPOSITION OF SUCH PENALTIES. CONSEQUENTLY, THE PROPOSAL IS A
NEGOTIABLE PROCEDURE UNDER SECTION 7106(B)(2) OF THE STATUTE /3/ WHICH
DOES NOT PREVENT THE AGENCY FROM ACTING AT ALL WITH RESPECT TO
DISCIPLINING EMPLOYEES /4/ OR LIMITING THE PENALITIES THE AGENCY MAY
IMPOSE UNDER APPLICABLE RULES AND REGULATIONS. NOR DOES THE PROPOSAL
REQUIRE THE AGENCY TO TAKE ANY ACTION INCONSISTENT WITH THE PRIVACY ACT,
5 U.S.C. 552A(1976), SINCE IT DOES NOT REQUIRE THE RELEASE OF NAMES OF
INVOLVED EMPLOYEES. THUS, CONTRARY TO THE AGENCY'S ASSERTIONS, THIS
PROPOSAL IS WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN.
ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND
REGULATIONS (5 CFR 2424.10(1981)), IT IS ORDERED THAT THE UNION'S
PETITION FOR REVIEW RELATING TO UNION PROPOSALS 1 THROUGH 4 BE, AND IT
HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT THE AGENCY SHALL UPON
REQUEST (OR AS OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES) BARGAIN CONCERNING
UNION PROPOSAL 5. /5/
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., FEBRUARY 4, 1982
RONALD W.HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN
HENRY B. FRAZIER III, MEMBER
LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES: ---------------
/1/ PARAGRAPH 8 OF OMB CIRCULAR A-118 ADDRESSES THE ALLOCATION AND
ASSIGNMENT OF PARKING FACILITIES, AND STATES IN PART, THAT "(TO)
MAXIMIZE THE EFFICIENT UTILIZATION OF AVAILABLE PARKING SPACES,
ASSIGNMENTS OF SPACES TO FEDERAL EMPLOYEES SHALL BE ON THE BASIS OF THE
REGULATIONS PROMULGATED BY GSA (FPMR 101-20.111 AND 101-20.117), AS
AMENDED TO COMPLY WITH THIS CIRCULAR."
PARAGRAPH 8 OF GSA'S IMPLEMENTING REGULATION, FPMR TEMPORARY
REGULATION D-65, AS AMENDED, SETS FORTH CERTAIN PRIORITIES FOR THE
ASSIGNMENT OF PARKING SPACES TO EMPLOYEES. PARAGRAPH 8 STATES AS
FOLLOWS:
8. PRIORITIES FOR EMPLOYEE PARKING. AGENCIES SHALL ENCOURAGE THE
CONSERVATION OF ENERGY
BY TAKING POSITIVE ACTION TO INCREASE CARPOOLING.
A. ASSIGNMENT OF SPACES. IN MEETING THEIR RESPONSIBILITIES TO
PROMOTE CARPOOLING,
AGENCIES SHALL ASSIGN EMPLOYEE PARKING AS FOLLOWS:
(1) HANDICAPPED EMPLOYEES . . .
(2) A GOAL OF NOT MORE THAN 10 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SPACES AVAILABLE
ON AN AGENCYWIDE BASIS
(EXCLUDING THE SPACES ASSIGNED TO SEVERELY HANDICAPPED EMPLOYEES) TO
EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL
AND/OR PERSONS WHO ARE ASSIGNED UNUSUAL HOURS. EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL
SHOULD MAKE EVERY EFFORT
TO CARPOOL.
(3) VANPOOLS.
(4) CARPOOLS BASED ON THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS.
/2/ SECTION 7117(A)(1) OF THE STATUTE PROVIDES AS FOLLOWS:
SEC. 7117. DUTY TO BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH; COMPELLING NEED; DUTY TO
CONSULT
(A)(1) SUBJECT TO PARAGRAPH (2) OF THIS SUBSECTION, THE DUTY TO
BARGAIN IN GOOD FAITH
SHALL, TO THE EXTENT NOT INCONSISTENT WITH ANY FEDERAL LAW OR ANY
GOVERNMENT-WIDE RULE OR
REGULATION, EXTEND TO MATTERS WHICH ARE THE SUBJECT OF ANY RULE OR
REGULATION ONLY IF THE RULE
OR REGULATION IS NOT A GOVERNMENT-WIDE RULE OR REGULATION.
/3/ SECTION 7106(B) PROVIDES, IN PERTINENT PART, AS FOLLOWS:
(B) NOTHING IN THIS SECTION SHALL PRECLUDE ANY AGENCY AND ANY LABOR
ORGANIZATION FROM NEGOTIATING--
* * * *
(2) PROCEDURES WHICH MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS OF THE AGENCY WILL OBSERVE
IN EXERCISING ANY
AUTHORITY UNDER THIS SECTION(.)
/4/ SEE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL
1999 AND ARMY-AIR FORCE EXCHANGE SERVICE, DIX-MCGUIRE EXCHANGE, FORT
DIX, NEW JERSEY, 2 FLRA 152(1979), ENFORCED SUB NOM. DEPARTMENT OF
DEFENSE V. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, 659 F.2D 1140 (D.C. CIR.
1981).
/5/ IN FINDING UNION PROPOSAL 5 NEGOTIABLE, THE AUTHORITY MAKES NO
JUDGMENT AS TO ITS MERITS.