[ v10 p9 ]
10:0009(2)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
10 FLRA No. 2 NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION (Union) and DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, OGDEN SERVICE CENTER, OGDEN, UTAH (Activity) Case No. O-NG-714 ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW THIS CASE IS BEFORE THE AUTHORITY PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE AND SECTION 2424.3 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS ON A PETITION FOR REVIEW OF A NEGOTIABILITY ISSUES FILED BY THE UNION. THE RECORD IN THIS CASE INDICATES THAT DURING NEGOTIATIONS BETWEEN THE ACTIVITY AND THE UNION, THE ACTIVITY ALLEGED THAT PROPOSALS CONCERNING SHIFTS AND TOURS OF DUTY IN THE ACTIVITY'S ADJUSTMENTS BRANCH WERE NONNEGOTIABLE BECAUSE THEY WOULD CONFLICT WITH MANAGEMENT'S RIGHTS UNDER SECTION 7106(B)(1) TO DETERMINE THE METHODS AND MEANS BY WHICH WORK IS PERFORMED. THE UNION THEN FILED THE INSTANT APPEAL WITH THE AUTHORITY SEEKING A DETERMINATION, PURSUANT TO SECTION 7117(C)(1) OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2424.1(A) OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND REGULATIONS, AS TO THE NEGOTIABILITY OF THE MATTER. SUBSEQUENTLY, IN A LETTER DATED AUGUST 18, 1982, THE AGENCY WITHDREW THE ALLEGATION OF NONNEGOTIABILITY. SINCE THE AGENCY HAS WITHDRAWN THE ALLEGATION CONCERNING THE UNION'S PROPOSALS, THERE IS NO LONGER AN ISSUE AS TO WHETHER THE PROPOSALS IN THIS CASE ARE WITHIN THE PARTIES' DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER THE STATUTE. THE DISPUTE INVOLVED IN THE UNION'S APPEAL THEREFORE HAS BEEN RENDERED MOOT. ACCORDINGLY, FOR THE REASONS STATED HEREIN, AND APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT THE INSTANT APPEAL BE, AND IT HEREBY IS, DISMISSED. FOR THE AUTHORITY. ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., SEPTEMBER 2, 1982 JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR