10:0448(76)NG - Joint Council of Unions, GPO and Government Printing Office -- 1982 FLRAdec NG
[ v10 p448 ]
10:0448(76)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
10 FLRA No. 76
JOINT COUNCIL OF UNIONS, GPO
Union
and
U. S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
Agency
Case No. O-NG-397
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
THE PETITION FOR REVIEW IN THIS CASE COMES BEFORE THE AUTHORITY
PURSUANT TO SECTION 7105(A)(2)(E) OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE
LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (THE STATUTE), AND PRESENTS ISSUES
RELATING TO THE NEGOTIABILITY OF THE FOLLOWING UNION PROPOSAL.
ARTICLE XIV (CORRECTIVE ACTION)
SEC. 13. IN CASES WHERE AN EMPLOYEE RECEIVES A LETTER PROPOSING
HIS/HER SUSPENSION (OF
MORE THAN 14 DAYS), DEMOTION, REMOVAL, OR AN ACTION OF SIMILAR
NATURE, THE UNION MAY ELECT TO
USE THE FOLLOWING PROCEDURE:
1. THE EMPLOYEE HAS THE RIGHT TO ANSWER ORALLY AND/OR IN WRITING AND
TO FURNISH AFFIDAVITS
AND OTHER DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE IN SUPPORT OF THE ANSWER. WRITTEN OR
ORAL REPLIES ARE TO BE
MADE TO THE OFFICIAL WHO ISSUES THE PROPOSED NOTICE. THE RIGHT TO
ANSWER ORALLY AND/OR IN
WRITING ALSO PERMITS THE EMPLOYEE TO BE REPRESENTED BY HIS UNION, AN
ATTORNEY OR OTHER
REPRESENTATIVE OF HIS CHOICE, OR
2. THE EMPLOYEE, THROUGH HIS UNION, MAY ELECT, WITHIN 10 CALENDAR
DAYS FROM THE RECEIPT OF
THE LETTER OF THE PROPOSED ACTION, TO REQUEST THAT THE FOLLOWING
FACT-FINDING PROCEDURE BE
INVOKED:
(A) THE FACT-FINDING WILL BE CONDUCTED BY AN IMPARTIAL THIRD PARTY
WHO IS SELECTED BY THE
PARTIES FROM A PANEL OF ARBITRATORS. THE UNION AND THE GPO WILL EACH
PAY ONE-HALF THE
COST. THIS PANEL WILL CONSIST OF ARBITRATORS WHO AGREE TO CONDUCT AN
EXPEDITED TYPE OF
HEARING AND AGREE THEY WILL RENDER A FINDING OF FACT WITHIN SEVEN (7)
DAYS AFTER COMPLETION OF
THE PRESENTATION TO THEM.
(B) THE FACT-FINDING WILL DEAL ONLY WITH THE CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH ARE
RELEVANT TO THE
CURRENT ALLEGED VIOLATION OR VIOLATIONS OF APPLICABLE REGULATIONS.
THE FACT FINDER'S REPORT
WILL STATE HIS FINDINGS OF FACT AND RECOMMENDATION(S) AND HIS REASONS
THEREFOR AND BE
PRESENTED TO THE PARTIES. THE PUBLIC PRINTER WILL REVIEW THE REPORT
AND ISSUE A FINAL
DECISION AS TO WHAT ACTION WILL BE TAKEN AND NOTIFY THE EMPLOYEE AND
HIS REPRESENTATIVE WITHIN
TWO WEEKS.
(C) THE LETTER OF FINAL DECISION WILL INFORM THE EMPLOYEE AND THE
UNION OF THEIR RIGHT TO
APPEAL THE LETTER OF FINAL DECISION TO EITHER THE MERIT SYSTEMS
PROTECTION BOARD OR PROCEED TO
PARAGRAPH (D) SECTION 10, ARTICLE VIII OF THIS AGREEMENT. /1/
UPON CAREFUL CONSIDERATION OF THE ENTIRE RECORD, INCLUDING THE
PARTIES' CONTENTIONS, THE AUTHORITY MAKES THE FOLLOWING DETERMINATION.
THIS PROPOSAL CONSTITUTES A NEGOTIABLE PROCEDURE UNDER SECTION
7106(B)(2) OF THE STATUTE "WHICH MANAGEMENT OFFICIALS OF THE AGENCY WILL
OBSERVE IN EXERCISING ANY AUTHORITY UNDER THIS SECTION," SPECIFICALLY IN
THIS INSTANCE, THE AUTHORITY UNDER SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A) "TO SUSPEND,
REMOVE, REDUCE IN GRADE OR PAY, OR TAKE OTHER DISCIPLINARY ACTION"
AGAINST EMPLOYEES IN THE BARGAINING UNIT. THAT IS, THE PROPOSED
PROCEDURES WOULD NOT PREVENT THE AGENCY FROM ACTING AT ALL TO EXERCISE
ITS STATUTORY RIGHTS UNDER SECTION 7106(A)(2)(A); THEY WOULD ONLY STAY
THE EXERCISE OF THOSE RIGHTS UNTIL THE PROCEDURES ARE ACCOMPLISHED AND,
HENCE, ARE WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN. /2/ AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 1999 AND ARMY-AIR FORCE EXCHANGE
SERVICE, DIX-MCGUIRE EXCHANGE, FORT DIX, NEW JERSEY, 2 FLRA 153(1979),
ENFORCED SUB NOM, DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE V. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS
AUTHORITY, 659 F.2D 1140 (D.C. CIR. 1981), CERT. DENIED SUB NOM. AFGE
V. FLRA . . . , U.S. . . . , 102 S.CT. 1443(1982).
ACCORDINGLY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2424.10 OF THE AUTHORITY'S RULES AND
REGULATIONS, IT IS ORDERED THAT THE AGENCY SHALL UPON REQUEST (OR AS
OTHERWISE AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES) BARGAIN CONCERNING THE UNION
PROPOSAL. /3/
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., NOVEMBER 10, 1982
RONALD W. HAUGHTON, CHAIRMAN
HENRY B. FRAZIER III MEMBER
LEON B. APPLEWHAITE, MEMBER
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ IN ITS STATEMENT OF POSITION, THE AGENCY ALLEGES THAT THE UNION'S
PROPOSAL, AS ORIGINALLY SUBMITTED, CONTAINED A PROVISION IN SUBSECTION
2(B) WHICH WOULD, IN ESSENCE, REQUIRE THE AGENCY TO ISSUE A FINAL
DECISION AS TO PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF THE FACT
FINDER'S REPORT, "OTHERWISE THE DECISION OF THE FACT-FINDER SHALL BE
FINAL." HOWEVER, INASMUCH AS THE UNION'S PROPOSAL SET FORTH ABOVE, AS
LAST PRESENTED TO THE AGENCY AND AS CURRENTLY BEFORE THE AUTHORITY,
CONTAINS NO SUCH PROVISION, THE AUTHORITY FINDS THAT ANY DISPUTE BETWEEN
THE PARTIES AS TO THE NEGOTIABILITY OF THAT PROVISION HAS BEEN RENDERED
MOOT AND THEREFORE WILL NOT BE FURTHER CONSIDERED HEREIN.
/2/ IN DECIDING THAT THE PROPOSAL IS WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN, THE
AUTHORITY MAKES NO JUDGMENT AS TO ITS MERITS.
/3/ THE AGENCY CLAIMS THE PROPOSAL IS ONLY PERMISSIVELY NEGOTIABLE
BECAUSE IN EFFECT IT WOULD REQUIRE THE AGENCY TO ISSUE A REGULATION
PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY GRANTED UNDER 5 U.S.C. 7513(C) WHICH PROVIDES
THAT: "AN AGENCY MAY PROVIDE, BY REGULATION, FOR A HEARING . . . . "
EVEN ASSUMING THE AGENCY WOULD HAVE TO ISSUE A REGULATION TO IMPLEMENT
THE PROPOSED PROCEDURE, THE CONCLUSION IT DRAWS FROM THIS CIRCUMSTANCE,
I.E., THAT THE QUOTED PROVISION GRANTING DISCRETION TO THE AGENCY LIMITS
ITS DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER THE STATUTE, IS UNSUPPORTED. ON THE CONTRARY,
IT IS FIRMLY ESTABLISHED THAT, EXCEPT WHERE PROVIDED OTHERWISE BY LAW OR
REGULATION, TO THE EXTENT THAT AN AGENCY HAS DISCRETION OVER A MATTER
AFFECTING THE CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT OF ITS EMPLOYEES, THAT MATTER IS
WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN UNDER THE STATUTE. AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 32 AND OFFICE OF PERSONNEL
MANAGEMENT, WASHINGTON, D.C., 8 FLRA NO. 87(1982). SEE ALSO AMERICAN
FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, MEAT GRADERS COUNCIL, AFL-CIO AND
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOOD SAFETY AND QUALITY SERVICE, MEAT GRADING
BRANCH, WASHINGTON, D.C., 8 FLRA NO. 25(1982) AT NOTE 9.