10:0560(97)NG - NFFE Local 1363, Republic of Korea and Army Garrison, Yongsan, Korea -- 1982 FLRAdec NG
[ v10 p560 ]
10:0560(97)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
10 FLRA No. 97
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1363,
REPUBLIC OF KOREA
Union
and
U.S. ARMY GARRISON,
YONGSAN, KOREA
Agency
Case No. O-NG-450
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority
pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and raises the question
of the negotiability of the following Union proposal.
Union Proposal
We propose that members of our bargaining units not be subject
to late payment charges.
Upon careful consideration of the entire record, including the
contentions of the parties, the Authority makes the following
determinations: The proposal is concerned with the conditions under
which employees will reimburse the Agency for monies they have received
through advances where the expenses actually incurred for work-related
expenses are less than the advance. The proposal provides that no late
payment charges will be applied to such a debt after the employees'
repayment becomes delinquent. The Parties herein are in agreement that
the term "late payment charges" as used in the proposal refers to both
"late charges" and/or "interest" as those terms are used in pertinent
regulations and correlative guidance. /1/
The instant proposal is in all respects materially to the same effect
as the proposal held to be within the duty to bargain by the Authority
in National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 29 and U.S. Army
Engineer District, Kansas City, Mo., 10 FLRA No. 95 (1982). Based on
U.S. Army Engineer District, Kansas City, Mo. and the reasons stated
therein, it is therefore concluded that the instant proposal is within
the duty to bargain. /2/
Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations (5 CFR 2424.10), IT IS ORDERED that the Agency shall upon
request (or as otherwise agreed to by the parties) bargain concerning
the proposal.
Issued, Washington, D.C., December 3, 1982
Ronald W. Haughton, Chairman
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
Leon B. Applewhaite, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ See National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 29 and U.S.
Army Engineer District, Kansas City, Mo., 10 FLRA No. 95 (1982) at page
2, n. 3.
/2/ In deciding that the proposal is within the duty to bargain, the
Authority, of course, makes no judgment as to the merits thereof.