12:0167(40)RO - HHS, Philadelphia Regional Office, Region III and NTEU and AFGE Local 3376 -- 1983 FLRAdec RP
[ v12 p167 ]
12:0167(40)RO
The decision of the Authority follows:
12 FLRA No. 40
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN
SERVICES, PHILADELPHIA REGIONAL
OFFICE, REGION III
Activity
and
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION
Petitioner
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 3376, AFL-CIO
Intervenor
Case No. 2-RO-30
DECISION AND DIRECTION OF ELECTION
Upon a petition duly filed under section 7111(b)(1) of the Federal
Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute), a hearing was
held before a hearing officer of the Authority. The Authority has
reviewed the hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing and finds
that they are free from prejudicial error. The rulings are hereby
affirmed.
Upon the entire record in this case, the Authority finds: /1/ The
Petitioner, National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU), seeks an election
in a unit currently represented by the Intervenor, American Federation
of Government Employees, Local 3376, AFL-CIO (AFGE), and composed of all
nonprofessional, nonsupervisory employees of the Department of Health
and Human Services, Region III, employed in Philadelphia and Wilkes
Barre, Pennsylvania (the Activity). The parties stipulated and the
Authority finds, in accordance with the criteria set forth in section
7112 of the Statute, that the following constitutes an appropriate unit:
Included: All nonprofessional, nonsupervisory employees of the
Department of Health and Human Services, Region III Office,
employed in Philadelphia and Wilkes Barre, Pennsylvania.
Excluded: All Department of Health and Human Services Region
III field and District Office employees, employees of the District
and Branch Offices of the Social Security Administration, members
of the Commissioned Officers Corps of Region III, stay in school
students, summer students, student trainees and temporary
employees with appointments of 90 days or less, professional
employees, management officials, supervisors, guards, confidential
employees, and employees engaged in Federal personnel work in
other than a purely clerical capacity.
The sole issue before the Authority is whether there is a valid
agreement in effect between the Activity and AFGE which bars NTEU's
petition pursuant to section 7111(f)(3) of the Statute. /2/ Prior to
commencing negotiations in 1975, the Activity and AFGE agreed to ground
rules which stated, in part, that the "final Negotiated Agreement is
subject to the approval of the Regional Director and the President of
the Local." Negotiations between the parties then continued
intermittently for some five years, during which time the parties
reached agreement on various issues. Finally, on February 29, 1980,
subsequent to the effective date of the Statute, representatives of both
parties initialed a document setting forth their agreement on the
remaining disputed proposals. AFGE claims that this document was a
final and , binding collective bargaining agreement which bars the
petition herein. The Authority disagrees, noting particularly the
parties' ground rules requirement that any final agreement must first be
approved by both the Activity's Regional Director (the title had become
Principal Regional Official by 1980) and AFGE Local 3376's President.
Indeed, AFGE, in its memorandum to the Activity dated May 20, 1980,
stated: "I have been directed to inform you that we are in agreement
with all articles and sections of the Labor-Management Agreement, which
is now being reviewed by Management." Thus, even AFGE understood, almost
three months after the date of the proposed agreement which it now
claims was executed on February 29, 1980, that the initialed document
was still subject to final approval. Under these circumstances, the
Authority concludes that there was not a " . . . written collective
bargaining agreement . . . " between the Activity and AFGE within the
meaning of section 7111(f)(3) of the Statute which may serve as a bar to
NTEU's petition. /3/
Moreover, even assuming, as argued by AFGE, that the document
initialed by the negotiators on February 29, 1980, constituted a
collective bargaining agreement which went into effect automatically 30
days thereafter in the absence of any disapproval by the Agency head
pursuant to the provisions of section 7114(c) of the Statute, /4/ that
agreement still could not serve as a bar. In this regard, the Authority
notes that, pursuant to section 2422.3(i) of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations, "(a)greements which go into effect automatically pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 7114(c) and which do not contain the date on which the
agreement became effective shall not constitute a bar to an election
petition." As the alleged agreement does not contain an effective date,
it could not under any circumstances constitute a bar to NTEU's
petition.
In view of the above, the Authority shall order an election in the
unit currently represented by AFGE.
DIRECTION OF ELECTION
An election by secret ballot shall be conducted among the employees
in the unit described above as soon as feasible. The appropriate
Regional Director shall supervise or conduct the election, as
appropriate, subject to the Authority's Rules and Regulations. Eligible
to vote are those in the voting group who were employed during the
payroll period immediately preceding the date below, including employees
who did not work during that period because they were out ill, on
vacation or on furlough, or in the military service, who appear in
person at the polls. Ineligible to vote are employees who have quit or
were discharged for cause since the designated payroll period and who
have not been rehired or reinstated before the election date. Those
eligible shall vote on whether they desire to be represented for the
purpose of exclusive recognition by the National Treasury Employees
Union; by the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3376,
AFL-CIO; or by neither. Issued, Washington, D.C., June 7, 1983
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ In accordance with an order of the U.S. District Court for the
District of Columbia in American Federation of Government Employees,
AFL-CIO, et al. v. Haughton, et al., Civil Action No. 81-0168 (D.D.C.
June 24, 1981), this case has been held in abeyance pending the
Authority's issuance of its decision on remand in Department of Health
and Human Services, Office of the Secretary, 11 FLRA No. 21 (1983).
/2/ Section 7111(f)(3) provides that:
(f) Exclusive recognition shall not be accorded to a labor
organization--
. . . .
(3) if there is then in effect a lawful written collective
bargaining agreement between the agency involved and an exclusive
representative (other than the labor organization seeking
exclusive recognition) covering any employees included in the unit
specified in the petition, unless--
(A) the collective bargaining agreement has been in effect for
more than 3 years, or
(B) the petition for exclusive recognition is filed not more
than 105 days and not less than 60 days before the expiration date
of the collective bargaining agreement(.)
/3/ The Authority's conclusion in this regard is consistent with the
Regional Director's finding, in dismissing an unfair labor practice
charge filed by AFGE in Case No. 2-CA-611, that the February 29, 1980
document "was not a final negotiated collective bargaining agreement."
This determination was not appealed by AFGE.
/4/ Section 7114(c) provides that:
(c)(1) An agreement between any agency and an exclusive
representative shall be subject to approval by the head of the
agency.
(2) The head of the agency shall approve the agreement within
30 days from the date the agreement is executed if the agreement
is in accordance with the provisions of this chapter and any other
applicable law, rule, or regulation (unless the agency has granted
an exception to the provision).
(3) If the head of the agency does not approve or disapprove
the agreement within the 30-day period, the agreement shall take
effect and shall be binding on the agency and the exclusive
representative subject to the provisions of this chapter and any
other applicable law, rule, or regulation.
(4) A local agreement subject to a national or other
controlling agreement at a higher level shall be approved under
the procedures of the controlling agreement or, if none, under
regulations prescribed by the agency.