12:0316(70)NG - AFSCME Locals 2477 and 2910 and Library of Congress -- 1983 FLRAdec NG
[ v12 p316 ]
12:0316(70)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
12 FLRA No. 70
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE,
COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES,
LOCALS 2477 and 2910
Union
and
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Agency
Case No. O-NG-381
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority
pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute), and raises issues
relating to the negotiability of the following Union proposal.
Administrative Detail Program
Special emphasis will be given to consideration of
underrepresented groups identified for affirmative action. Two
series of details will be offered in FY '81, with a minimum of 8
participants. (The underlined portion of the proposal is in
dispute.)
The subject of the Union proposal, the Agency's Administrative Detail
Program, is described by the Agency as follows:
The program is designed to provide employees who are motivated
but who have had little, if any, previous management experience
with a short-term opportunity (3 months) to exercise, develop, and
evaluate their interest in, and potential for, management . . . .
The number of details for each department (which has never
exceeded (2) two) has been determined by the (Agency) based on
availability of resources, work and overall opportunities.
The Union's proposal, however, would obligate the Agency temporarily
to reassign in a fiscal year a minimum of 16 employees who meet the
stated criterion. Based on the record and the specific language of the
proposal, such reassignments would be to positions involving managerial
duties and would be required regardless of whether positions or work of
a managerial nature were available for the identified employees. In
this regard, the proposal is to the same effect as Union Proposal I in
American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 695 and
Department of the Treasury, U.S. Mint, Denver, Colorado, 3 FLRA 43
(1980), which the Authority found to violate management's right to
assign under section 7106(a)(2)(A) of the Statute because, under the
proposal's requirement that employees be rotated weekly to new work
assignments irrespective of whether any new work was available which
required the performance of such duties or whether previous work
assignments had been completed, "management would be restricted in
making new assignments, or in modifying, terminating, or continuing
existing ones as deemed necessary or desirable." Hence, based on the
U.S. Mint, Denver, Colorado decision, and the reasons stated therein,
the instant proposal is outside the duty to bargain. /1/
Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations, IT IS ORDERED that the Union's petition for review be, and
it hereby is, dismissed. Issued, Washington, D.C., July 21, 1983
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ In view of the decision herein, it is unnecessary to address the
Agency's contentions concerning the applicability of section 7106(b)(1)
of the Statute to the instant dispute.