12:0635(125)NG - NFFE Local 1363 and Army Garrison, Yongsan, Korea -- 1983 FLRAdec NG
[ v12 p635 ]
12:0635(125)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
12 FLRA No. 125
NATIONAL FEDERATION OF
FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1363
Union
and
UNITED STATES ARMY
GARRISON, YONGSAN, KOREA
Agency
Case No. O-NG-480
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority
pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute). The issue presented
to the Authority is the negotiability of the following Union proposal:
Alcoholic beverages will not be dispensed to persons on duty.
Upon careful consideration of the entire record, including the
parties' contentions, the Authority makes the following determinations.
The Union's proposal concerns the dispensation of alcoholic beverages in
certain membership associations of nonappropriated fund
instrumentalities (NAFIs). The effect of the Union's proposal is to
prohibit the dispensation of alcoholic beverages only to persons on
duty, as opposed to prohibiting the dispensation of such beverages to
all employees during duty hours, as provided under an Agency regulation.
The sole contention of the Agency is that dispensation of alcoholic
beverages in membership association NAFIs is not a condition of
employment within the meaning of section 7103(a)(14) of the Statute, and
therefore is outside the scope of bargaining.
The duty to bargain under the Statute extends only to "conditions of
employment," i.e., personnel policies, practices, and matters affecting
working conditions. /1/ In construing that statutory phrase, the
Authority has found proposals which concern matters directly affecting
"the work situation and employment relationship" of bargaining unit
employees to be within the duty to bargain. E.g., National Treasury
Employees Union and Internal Revenue Service, 3 FLRA 693 (1980). See
also American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO and Air Force
Logistics Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio, 2 FLRA 604,
606 (1980), enforced as to other matters sub nom. Department of Defense
v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 659 F.2d 1140 (D.C. Cir. 1981),
cert. denied sub nom. AFGE v. FLRA, 455 U.S. 945, 102 S.Ct. 1443 (1982).
In this case, the Authority concludes that the dispensation of
alcoholic beverages in membership association NAFIs has no direct
relationship to the work situation and the employment relationship of
unit employees. Nor does the proposal directly relate to an Agency
policy requiring, as a precondition to the employment relationship, the
provision of essential facilities and services so as to ensure
reasonable standards of health and decency for unit employees. /2/
Rather, the dispensation of such beverages in membership association
NAFIs principally relates to activities of employees involved in
non-work activities while in a non-duty status. See International
Association of Fire Fighters, AFL-CIO, CLC, Local F-116 and Department
of the Air Force, Vandenberg Air Force Base, California, 7 FLRA No. 18
(1981).
Hence, the Authority finds that the disputed proposal regarding the
dispensation of alcoholic beverages in the NAFIs does not concern
matters which are "conditions of employment" within the meaning of
section 7103(a)(14) of the Statute. Therefore, the Agency is not
obligated to bargain with respect to the proposal.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations, IT IS ORDERED that the petition for review be, and it
hereby is, dismissed. Issued, Washington, D.C., August 25, 1983
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ Section 7103(a)(14) of the Statute.
/2/ Cf. National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1363 and
Headquarters, U.S. Army Garrison, Yongsan, Korea, 4 FLRA No. 23 (1980)
(matter of ration control is condition of employment since directly
related to reasonable standards of health and decency for unit employees
which the agency required as a precondition to their employment in an
overseas command).