13:0005(2)AR - Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Depot Memphis, Memphis, TN and AFGE Local 2501 -- 1983 FLRAdec AR
[ v13 p5 ]
13:0005(2)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
13 FLRA No. 2
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY,
DEFENSE DEPOT MEMPHIS,
MEMPHIS, TENNESSEE
(Activity)
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
LOCAL 2501
(Union)
Case No. O-AR-462
DECISION
This matter is before the Authority on an exception to the award of
Arbitrator Matthew W. Jewett filed on behalf of the Union under section
7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and
part 2425 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations.
The dispute in this matter concerns a five-day suspension imposed
upon the grievant for failing to report to duty on time. As his award,
the Arbitrator determined that based upon the grievant's prior record
and the circumstances of this case, the penalty was appropriate and the
grievance was without merit. The Arbitrator therefore denied the
grievance.
In its exception, the Union essentially argues that the Arbitrator
was confused in understanding the issues in the case, did not address
the Union's "determined issues," and did not consider all of the
evidence presented by the Union. Upon careful consideration of the
entire record before the Authority, including the Union's contentions,
the Authority concludes that the Union's contentions do not provide any
basis for finding the award deficient. It is clear that the Union is
merely attempting to relitigate the merits of the case before the
Authority since the thrust of the Union's exception constitutes
disagreement with the Arbitrator's reasoning and conclusions based on
the evidence and testimony before him. Such disagreement does not
provide a basis for finding the award deficient. E.g., American
Federation of Government Employees, Local 2327 and Department of Health,
Education, and Welfare, Social Security Administration, 5 FLRA No. 23
(1981); Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Conversion and Repair, United
States Navy and Local R4-2, National Association of Government Employees
(NAGE), 5 FLRA No. 29 (1981).
Accordingly, the Union's exception is denied. Issued, Washington,
D.C., September 15, 1983
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY