15:0012(3)AR - Army, Aberdeen Proving Ground Command, Aberdeen, MD and IAM Lodge 2424 -- 1984 FLRAdec AR
[ v15 p12 ]
15:0012(3)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
15 FLRA No. 3
U.S. ARMY, ABERDEEN
PROVING GROUND COMMAND,
ABERDEEN, MARYLAND
Activity
and
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION
OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE
WORKERS, AFL-CIO, LODGE 2424
Union
Case No. O-AR-455
DECISION
This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to the award of
Arbitrator Robert J. Ables filed by the Agency under section 7122(a) of
the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425 of
the Authority's Rules and Regulations.
The Arbitrator in this case determined that the Activity had
improperly adopted the procedures by which it filled two positions at
WG-7. Accordingly, the Arbitrator vacated the two selections for the
positions and essentially directed the Activity to rerun the selection
action and to select from the WG-6 drivers, including the incumbents, in
the movements section at the time of the grievance.
In its exceptions the Agency primarily contends that the award is
contrary to section 7106(a)(2)(C) of the Statute and FPM chapter 335,
appendix A, section A-4. The Authority agrees.
The Authority has repeatedly held that incumbent employees in these
cases are entitled, pursuant to FPM chapter 335, appendix A, section
A-4b, to be retained in the positions pending corrective action unless
it is specifically determined that the incumbents could not originally
have been properly selected. E.g., Defense Contract Administration
Services Management Area (DCASMA), Cedar Rapids, Iowa and American
Federation of Government Employees, Local 2752, AFL-CIO, 10 FLRA No. 94
(1983). Likewise, the Authority has expressly held that section
7106(a)(2)(C) provides for management's right to select from among a
group of properly ranked and certified candidates for promotion or from
any appropriate source. U.S. Army Infantry Center, Ft. Benning, Georgia
and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 54, AFL-CIO, 12
FLRA No. 38 (1983). Therefore, in terms of this case, the award is
deficient as contrary to FPM chapter 335, appendix A, section A-4b to
the extent that it orders the positions vacated in advance of corrective
action without finding that the incumbents could not properly have been
originally selected. Similarly, by ordering that the Activity select
from among the original WG-6 drivers, the award precludes a selection
from any other appropriate source and consequently is deficient as
contrary to section 7106(a)(2)(C). For these reasons, the award is
modified to provide the following remedy in place of that ordered by the
Arbitrator in paragraphs 1-3 of his decision: /1/
The Activity shall rerun the selection action for the WG-7
positions in this case. The rerunning of the selection action by
the Activity and the action involving the incumbent employees must
fully conform with controlling law and regulation and the parties'
collective bargaining agreement. In particular, the rerunning of
the selection action must be in accordance with applicable merit
promotion procedures. In addition, the action involving the
incumbent employees must be in accordance with the corrective
action provisions of FPM chapter 335, appendix A, section A-4b.
Issued, Washington, D.C., June 6, 1984
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ In view of this decision, it is not necessary that the Authority
resolve the Agency's other exception to the award.