15:0098(20)NG - AFGE Local 2142 and Army, Corpus Christi Army Depot, Corpus Christi, TX -- 1984 FLRAdec NG
[ v15 p98 ]
15:0098(20)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
15 FLRA No. 20
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 2142, AFL-CIO
Union
and
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
CORPUS CHRISTI ARMY DEPOT,
CORPUS CHRISTI, TEXAS
Activity
Case No. O-NG-923
ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR REVIEW
This matter is before the Authority pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E)
of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (5 U.S.C. 7101
et seq.) and section 2424.1 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations (5
C.F.R. 2424.1) on a petition for review of negotiability issues filed by
the Union. For the reasons indicated below, the Union's petition must
be dismissed.
From the record before the Authority, it appears that on July 7,
1983, the parties forwarded a locally executed collective bargaining
agreement to the agency head for review and approval pursuant to section
7114(c) of the Statute. During such review, the agency head disapproved
two provisions in the negotiated agreement by letter dated August 5,
1983. Apparently, the parties met and continued bargaining in an
attempt to find alternative language for the proposals which were
declared nonnegotiable. The parties requested assistance from the
Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service but were unable to reach
agreement and resolve the dispute and reached impasse on October 21,
1983. The Union did not request another allegation from the agency but
sought the Authority's determination as to whether the disputed
proposals were within the parties' duty to bargain.
In its statement of position, the Agency asserts that the Union's
petition for review should be dismissed as untimely. In support of its
assertion the Agency argues that since the only written allegation of
nonnegotiability was the August 5, 1983, disapproval, the time limit for
filing a petition for review began to run on that date. The Authority
agrees.
Section 2424.3 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, which
implements section 7117(c)(2) of the Statute, provides, in pertinent
part:
The time limit for filing a petition for review is fifteen (15)
days after the date the agency's allegation that the duty to
bargain in good faith does not extend to the matter proposed to be
bargained is served on the exclusive representative . . . .
It is well-established that the agency head's disapproval of a
provision in a locally executed agreement pursuant to a review under
section 7114(c) of the Statute is an allegation of nonnegotiability for
purposes of appeal to the Authority. American Federation of Government
Employees, AFL-CIO, Local 1052 and United States Army Engineer Center,
Fort Belvoir, Virginia, 6 FLRA 460 (1981). Since the agency head's
disapproval in this case was served on the Union by mail on August 5,
1983, under section 2424.3 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations as
well as section 2429.22 which is also applicable to the computation of
the time limit here involved, any appeal from that allegation had to be
filed with the Authority no later than August 29, 1983, in order to be
considered timely. Since the Union's petition for review was not filed
until November 7, 1983, it is clearly untimely and must be dismissed on
that basis.
Accordingly, and apart from other considerations, IT IS ORDERED that
the Union's petition for review in this case be, and it hereby is,
dismissed. /1/
Issued, Washington, D.C., June 13, 1984
Harold Kessler, Director, Case
Management
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ This dismissal is without prejudice. That is, if the matters
proposed to be negotiated continue in dispute between the parties, an
allegation may be requested in writing and a petition for review duly
filed by the Union with the Authority in accordance with section 2424.3
of the Authority's Rules and Regulations.