15:0200(36)AR - Air Force, Air Force Logistics Command, Kelly AFB, TX and AFGE Local 1617 -- 1984 FLRAdec AR
[ v15 p200 ]
15:0200(36)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
15 FLRA No. 36
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,
AIR FORCE LOGISTICS COMMAND,
KELLY AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
Activity
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1617
Union
Case No. O-AR-675
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
This case is before the Authority on exceptions to the award of
Arbitrator Joe D. Woodward filed by the Department of the Air Force (the
Agency) on behalf of the Activity pursuant to section 7122(a) of the
Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and section 2425.1 of
the Authority's Rules and Regulations. For the reasons stated below, it
has been determined that the Agency's exceptions must be dismissed as
untimely filed.
The Arbitrator's award in this case is dated June 14, 1983, and
appears to have been served on the parties by mail on the same day. A
dispute subsequently arose concerning the Agency's compliance with a
portion of the award. In September 1983, the parties requested
clarification of that part of the award from the Arbitrator. The
Arbitrator responded on October 28, 1983, stating, among other things,
that it appeared that his June 14 award was clear, concise and not open
to misinterpretation and rejecting the Agency's interpretation of the
disputed portion of the award. However, the Arbitrator also provided
further explanation of the intent of the remedy he had ordered. The
Agency then filed the instant exceptions with the Authority on November
28, 1983.
Under section 7122(b) of the Statute, as amended, /1/ and section
2425.1(b) of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, as amended, /2/
which amendments are applicable to exceptions pending or filed with the
Authority on or after March 2, 1984, and under sections 2429.21 and
2429.22 of the Rules and Regulations, which are also applicable to
computation of the time limit here involved, any exceptions to the
Arbitrator's award of June 14, 1983 had to be filed with the Authority
by the close of business on July 18, 1983. Thus, it immediately and
clearly appears that the exceptions filed by the Agency on November 28,
1983 are untimely. However, the Agency asserts that since its
exceptions were filed within 30 days of the date of the Arbitrator's
clarification they should be considered timely.
As the Agency recognizes, the Authority has held in the particular
circumstances of a case where the arbitrator, in response to a
clarification request, modified his award in such a way as to give rise
to alleged deficiencies, that the time limit for filing exceptions began
with the modified award. /3/ In this case, however, it is clear that in
his clarification of October 28 the Arbitrator did not modify his award
of June 14, 1983 so as to give rise to the deficiencies alleged in the
Agency's exceptions. Rather, as indicated above, the Arbitrator
essentially found that the Agency has misinterpreted the award and while
he provided some further explanation of the intent of the remedy that
had been ordered, he did not modify it. Thus, the Agency in essence is
seeking Authority review of the June 14, 1983 award and the exceptions
filed on November 28, 1983 therefore are clearly untimely.
Accordingly, the Agency's exceptions are hereby dismissed.
For the Authority.
Issued, Washington, D.C., June 29, 1984
Harold D. Kessler, Director, Case
Management
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ Section 7122(b) of the Statute was amended by the Civil Service
Miscellaneous Amendments Act of 1983 (Pub. L. No. 98-224, Sec. 4, 98
Stat. 47, 48 (1984) to provide that the 30-day period for filing
exceptions to an arbitrator's award begins on the date the award is
served on the filing party.
/2/ 49 Fed.Reg. 22623 (1984).
/3/ U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management,
Eugene District Office and National Federation of Federal Employees,
Local 1911, 6 FLRA 401, 403 n.2 (1981).