15:0243(45)AR - Patent and Trademark Office and Patent Office Professional Association -- 1984 FLRAdec AR
[ v15 p243 ]
15:0243(45)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
15 FLRA No. 45
U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
Activity
and
PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
Union
Case No. O-AR-780
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to the award of
Arbitrator Joseph A. Sickles filed by the Activity under section 7122(a)
of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and section
2425.1 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. For the reasons set
forth below, the Authority is without jurisdiction to review the
Activity's exceptions and they must be dismissed on that basis.
The dispute in this matter arose when the grievant received a notice
of proposed removal for unsatisfactory performance pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
4303. The Arbitrator found that the proposed removal was not a final
agency action and therefore not properly grievable; moreover, based on
the Activity's subsequent actions, that the grievance was moot. The
Activity then filed the instant exceptions with the Authority.
Section 7122(a) of the Statute provides in pertinent part:
Either party to arbitration under this chapter may file with
the Authority an exception to any arbitrator's award pursuant to
the arbitration (other than an award relating to a matter
described in section 7121(f) of this title).
The matters described in section 7121(f) of the Statute include those
covered under 5 U.S.C. 4303 which applies to adverse actions based on
unacceptable performance. Pursuant to section 7121(f), review of an
arbitration award relating to such matters must be obtained in
accordance with 5 U.S.C. 7703, i.e., in the same manner and under the
same conditions as judicial review of a final decision of the Merit
Systems Protection Board.
Since the Arbitrator's award in this case involves a matter directly
related to a matter covered by 5 U.S.C. 4303, under section 7122(a) of
the Statute the Authority is without jurisdiction to review the
Activity's exceptions. Rather, judicial review of the Arbitrator's
award may be sought pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7703.
Accordingly, and apart from other considerations, the Activity's
exceptions are hereby dismissed.
For the Authority.
Issued, Washington, D.C., July 5, 1984
Harold D. Kessler, Director, Case
Management