15:0330(70)NG - ACT and Delaware NG -- 1984 FLRAdec NG
[ v15 p330 ]
15:0330(70)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
15 FLRA No. 70
ASSOCIATION OF CIVILIAN TECHNICIANS,
INC.
Union
and
DELAWARE NATIONAL GUARD
Agency
Case No. O-NG-540
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority
pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute). The issue presented
is the negotiability of the following Union proposal:
Prior to an employee voluntarily converting his present
position and status to the AGR Program, he/she will be informed
and will sign a statement of acknowledgment that he/she
understands that, should a termination of tour of duty occur,
he/she will not be entitled to restoration or re-employment rights
to vacant or occupied positions within the bargaining unit.
Upon careful consideration of the entire record, including the
parties' contentions, the Authority makes the following determinations.
The proposal is concerned with the entitlement of an employee to
restoration or reemployment rights to vacant or occupied positions
within the bargaining unit, when the employee voluntarily converts from
a technician position to the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program.
Based on the record, the Agency has asserted that under law employees
voluntarily converting from a technician position to the AGR Program
have certain restoration rights. Specifically, the Agency claims that
participation in the AGR Program is duty performed under section 502(f)
of Title 32, /1/ which duty entitles an employee to reemployment to the
position held by the employee when called to duty. On its face, the
specific language of 5 U.S.C. 3551 supports the Agency's contention.
/2/ The Union, to the contrary, claims 5 U.S.C. 3551 does not apply to
employees participating in the AGR Program. However, the Union has not
supported this contention.
Under the Statute, matters "specifically provided for by Federal
statute" are expressly excluded from the definition of "conditions of
employment" in section 7103(a)(14)(C) and hence, are not within the duty
to bargain. See e.g., Association of Civilian Technicians, Pennsylvania
State Council and the Adjutant General, Department of Military Affairs,
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 3 FLRA 49 (1980). Since, based on the
record, under Federal law any person who enters upon duty under section
502(f) of title 32 is specifically provided certain reemployment rights
under 5 U.S.C. 3551, the Union's proposal is expressly excluded by
section 7103(a)(14)(C) from the definition of "conditions of employment"
and, therefore, is not within the duty to bargain.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations (5 CFR 2424.10 (1982)), IT IS ORDERED that the Union's
petition for review be, and it hereby is, dismissed. /3/
Issued, Washington, D.C., July 24, 1984
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ Section 502 of Title 32 provides as follows:
Sec. 502. Required drills and field exercises
(f) Under regulations to be prescribed by the Secretary of the
Army or Secretary of the Air Force, as the case may be, a member
of the National Guard may--
(1) without his consent, but with the pay and allowances
provided by law; or
(2) with his consent, either with or without pay and
allowances; be ordered to perform training or other duty in
addition to that prescribed under subsection (a). Duty without
pay shall be considered for all purposes as if it were duty with
pay.
/2/ 5 U.S.C. 3551 in relevant part provides as follows:
Sec. 3551. Restoration; Reserves and National Guardsmen
An employee as defined by section 2105 of this title or an individual
employed by the government of the District of Columbia, permanent or
temporary indefinite, who is ordered to active duty or to duty under
sections 502-503 of title 32 as a Reserve of the armed forces or member
of the National Guard is entitled, on release from duty within the time
limits specified in section 9(g) of the Military Selective Service Act
of 1967 (50 U.S.C.App. 459(g)), to be restored to the position held by
him when ordered to duty(.)
/3/ In view of its decision herein, the Authority finds it
unnecessary to address the Agency's other arguments concerning the
nonnegotiability of the proposal.