15:0610(130)NG - NTEU and Treasury, IRS, Cleveland District Office -- 1984 FLRAdec NG
[ v15 p610 ]
15:0610(130)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
15 FLRA No. 130
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES
UNION
Union
and
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY,
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
CLEVELAND DISTRICT OFFICE
Agency
Case No. O-NG-428
ORDER DISMISSING NEGOTIABILITY APPEAL
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority
pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute). Upon careful
consideration of the entire record, including the parties' contentions,
the Authority makes the following determination.
The negotiability appeal in this case arose out of the removal by the
Agency of file cabinets and material belonging to local chapters of the
Union at the Agency's Youngstown and Toledo offices in the Cleveland
District. By way of background, prior to 1981 when individual District
Office bargaining units were consolidated into a nationwide bargaining
unit, the local Union chapters at Youngstown and Toledo were permitted
to keep file cabinets in their local offices and in some instances were
supplied file cabinets by the Agency. In 1981, subsequent to the
negotiation of a national collective bargaining agreement known as the
NORD (National Office, Regions and Districts), the Agency first notified
the local Union chapters at the Youngstown and Toledo offices that file
cabinets and other materials would have to be removed. The Union
requested bargaining over this change and the Agency refused, claiming
that its actions were in accordance with the new national agreement
which made no provision for supplying file cabinets or other materials
to local chapters of the Union. Thereafter, the Agency removed the
materials from its Youngstown and Toledo facilities and put them in
storage. The Union filed a negotiability appeal and an unfair labor
practice charge alleging that this conduct constituted a unilateral
change in past practice. Pursuant to section 2424.5 of the Authority's
Rules and Regulations, the Union elected to proceed with the unfair
labor practice charge and to suspend further action on the negotiability
appeal.
Upon investigation of the unfair labor practice charge, the Regional
Director concluded that the Agency was not required to bargain over the
change because the matter of providing office facilities, including file
cabinets, was covered in the national agreement between the parties
which superceded the past practice in effect when the parties bargained
at the district level. The Union thereupon appealed the Regional
Director's determination to the General Counsel. The General Counsel
denied the appeal, agreeing with the Regional Director that the matter
of providing office facilities was included in the NORD agreement after
extensive bargaining on the matter. The General Counsel noted that the
dispute essentially revolved around the parties' differing and arguable
interpretations of the contract and was more properly resolved through
the dispute resolution procedure provided for in the agreement.
In the absence of a duty to bargain between the parties, issues as to
whether a particular proposal is inconsistent with applicable law, rule
or regulation are not appropriate for resolution by the Authority.
National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1363 and Headquarters,
U.S. Army Garrison, Yongsan, Korea, 8 FLRA 200 (1982), and National
Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1363 and Headquarters, U.S. Army
Garrison, Yongsan, Korea, 8 FLRA 134 (1982). Thus, inasmuch as the
Regional Director has determined that there was no obligation on the
Agency to bargain, it is concluded that the instant appeal is now moot.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations, IT IS ORDERED that the Union's petition for review be, and
it hereby is, dismissed.
Issued, Washington, D.C., August 28, 1984
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY