15:0894(167)AR - VA Data Processing Center, Hines, IL and SEIU Local 73 -- 1984 FLRAdec AR
[ v15 p894 ]
15:0894(167)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
15 FLRA No. 167
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
DATA PROCESSING CENTER,
HINES, ILLINOIS
Activity
and
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL
UNION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 73
Union
Case No. O-AR-568
DECISION
This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to the award of
Arbitrator George E. Larney filed by the Agency under section 7122(a) of
the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425 of
the Authority's Rules and Regulations.
The dispute before the Arbitrator in this matter concerned whether
the Activity has the right to invoke arbitration to resolve a grievance.
The Arbitrator determined that under the parties' collective bargaining
agreement which had been negotiated under Executive Order No. 11491 (the
Order), the Activity did not have the right to invoke arbitration.
As one of its exceptions, the Agency essentially contends that the
award is contrary to the Statute. Specifically, the Agency argues that
management objected to the continuation of the agreement provisions
denying it access to arbitration and that such objection provided
management the right under the Statute to invoke arbitration.
The Authority concludes that the award is contrary to the Statute.
The Authority has specifically held that provisions of the Statute,
primarily provisions of section 7121, require agency access to
negotiated grievance and arbitration procedures. Laborers International
Union of North America, AFL-CIO-CLC, Local 1267 and Defense Logistics
Agency, Defense Depot Tracy, Tracy, California, 14 FLRA No. 91 (1984)
(proposals 8-9). However, under section 13 of the Order, it was not
mandatory to provide agency access to the negotiated grievance and
arbitration procedures, and consequently those policies have been
superseded, and pursuant to section 7135(b) of the Statute, are no
longer in effect. See Interpretation and Guidance, 2 FLRA 273, 278 n.7
(1979). Thus, as to agreements negotiated under the Order with a
provision effectively barring agency access to arbitration as in this
case, the continuation of such a provision would be precluded by an
objection from either party to the provision and the agency access
required by the Statute would apply. See id. In the circumstances of
this case, the Activity had expressed to the Union dissatisfaction with
the arbitration procedure of the parties' agreement, had asserted that
this expression was an objection to it, and had filed the grievance
involved herein stating that arbitration was being invoked pursuant to
the Statute. The Authority finds that these actions constituted an
objection to the continuation of the agreement provision barring the
Activity access to arbitration. Cf. Veterans Administration, Audie L.
Murphy Memorial Veterans Hospital and American Federation of Government
Employees, Local 3511, 15 FLRA No. 166 (1984) (wherein the agency
confirmed that the parties continued in effect the collective bargaining
agreement they entered into before the effective date of the Statute and
that neither party objected to the continuation of the negotiated
grievance procedure, and consequently the Authority found no actions
which constituted an objection to the continuation of that negotiated
grievance procedure so as to require the access to arbitration provided
by the Statute). Consequently, access to arbitration by the Activity
over the unsettled grievance was required by provisions of the Statute,
and the award barring the Activity that access is deficient as contrary
to the Statute. Accordingly, the award is set aside.
Issued, Washington, D.C., August 31, 1984
Barbara J. Mahone, Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY