16:0305(47)RO - Naval Medical Command, National Capital Region and Local 14, Federal Firefighters Association and Local 361, AFGE -- 1984 FLRAdec RP
[ v16 p305 ]
16:0305(47)RO
The decision of the Authority follows:
16 FLRA No. 47
NAVAL MEDICAL COMMAND
NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION
Activity
and
LOCAL 14, FEDERAL FIREFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION
Petitioner
and
LOCAL 361, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, (AFL-CIO)
Intervenor
Case No. 3-RO-30017
DECISION AND ORDER
Upon a petition duly filed with the Authority under section 7111 of
the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute), a
hearing was held before a hearing officer of the Authority. The
Authority has reviewed the hearing officer's rulings made at the hearing
and finds that they are free from prejudicial error. They are hereby
affirmed.
Upon careful consideration of the entire record, including the
parties' contentions, the Authority finds: Local 14, Federal
Firefighters Association (Firefighters) seeks to represent a unit of all
nonsupervisory general schedule (GS) Fire Prevention and Protection
employees of the Naval Medical Command, National Capital Region,
Bethesda, Maryland 20814. Since 1963, these employees have been part of
a unit represented by Local 361, American Federation of Government
Employees (AFL-CIO) (AFGE). The Activity and AFGE contend that granting
the petition would result in unnecessary fragmentation of an appropriate
unit.
The Authority established as a general standard in severance issues
that it "is bound by the three criteria for determining the
appropriateness of any unit . . . ." /1/ Such a standard is mandated by
section 7112(a)(1) of the Statute. /2/ In applying the three criteria
to the circumstances of this case, the Authority concludes that
severance should be denied. The record establishes that the
Activity-wide unit currently represented by AFGE is appropriate as all
of the Activity's employees, including the Fire Prevention and
Protection employees, share a community of interest at the Activity
level and that such unit promotes effective dealings and efficiency of
agency operations. Thus, all of the Activity's employees share a common
mission, are subject to the same merit promotion policies and
competitive areas, and have been part of a long-standing, established
bargaining unit. Further, the weight of the evidence fails to
demonstrate that the Fire Prevention and Protection employees have not
been represented fairly or that their bargaining concerns have been
overlooked by AFGE. /3/ Finally, in agreement with the Activity and the
Intervenor and noting particularly the long-standing, established
Activity-wide bargaining unit, it is concluded that effective dealings
and efficiency of operations of the Activity will be promoted by
avoiding unnecessary fragmentation. Accordingly, the Authority
concludes that the Firefighter's petition seeks an inappropriate unit
and therefore must be dismissed. U.S. Coast Guard Air Station Cape Cod,
Otis Air Force Base, Pocasset, Massachusetts, 10 FLRA 543 (1982) and
Department of the Navy, Naval Air Station, Moffett Field, California, 8
FLRA 10 (1982).
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition in Case No. 3-RO-30017 be, and
it hereby is, dismissed. Issued, Washington, D.C., October 30, 1984
Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
Chairman
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ International Communications Agency, 5 FLRA 97 at 99 (1981).
/2/ Section 7112(a)(1) provides:
Sec. 7112. Determination of appropriate units for labor organization
representation
(a)(1) The Authority shall determine the appropriateness of any
unit. The Authority shall determine in each case whether, in
order to ensure employees the fullest freedom in exercising the
rights guaranteed under this chapter, the appropriate unit should
be established on an agency, plant, installation, functional, or
other basis and shall determine any unit to be an appropriate unit
only if the determination will ensure a clear and identifiable
community of interest among the employees in the unit and will
promote effective dealings with, and efficiency of the operations
of, the agency involved.
/3/ AFGE and the Activity have had numerous collective bargaining
agreements over the past twenty years, the most recent agreement having
expired in February of 1982.