16:0840(118)CA - Justice, INS, Washington, DC and AFGE Local 1589 -- 1984 FLRAdec CA
[ v16 p840 ]
16:0840(118)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
16 FLRA No. 118
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Respondent
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1589, AFL-CIO
Charging Party
Case No. 9-CA-30065
DECISION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Authority pursuant to the Regional
Director's "Order Transferring Case to the Federal Labor Relations
Authority" in accordance with section 2429.1(a) of the Authority's Rules
and Regulations.
Upon consideration of the entire record in this case, including the
parties' stipulation of facts, accompanying exhibits, and the parties'
contentions, the Authority finds:
The complaint alleges that the Respondent, the U.S. Immigration and
Naturalization Service, violated section 7116(a)(1), (5) and (8) of the
Statute by failing to fully comply with an arbitration award rendered on
October 22, 1982 by Arbitrator Timothy D. W. Williams, pursuant to a
grievance filed under the terms of the negotiated grievance procedure
between the Respondent and the American Federation of Government
Employees (National Immigration and Naturalization Service Council)
(AFGE). /1/ Arbitrator Williams' award dealt with the seven day
suspension of an employee of the Portland, Oregon District resulting
from three separate management allegations of misconduct. The
arbitrator ruled that a three day suspension for one of the infractions
was consistent with the parties' agreement but that both of the two day
suspensions were not consistent with such agreement. He ordered that
the employee be reimbursed for four paid workdays. The employee's seven
day suspension ran from a Sunday through the following Saturday
inclusive, which the Respondent contends is consistent with Office of
Personnel Management requirements for suspensions of less than 14 days.
Thus, the employee missed only five paid workdays. The Respondent
reimbursed the employee for only two missed paid workdays, thereby
leaving the employee with three missed paid workdays which it viewed as
being consistent with the arbitrator's finding. The General Counsel and
the Charging Party contend that the arbitrator's award clearly requires
the Respondent to provide the employee with four days backpay and that
the arbitrator's specific requirement for four days backpay is
consistent with the facts presented to him at the arbitration hearing.
The Respondent sought clarification of the award from the arbitrator.
The arbitrator refused this request for two basic reasons-- the
clarification was not jointly sought by the parties involved as the
Charging Party did not participate in the request, and because the award
is clear on its face and consistent with the facts presented before him
at the hearing. Exceptions to the arbitrator's award were never filed
pursuant to the provisions of section 7122(a) of the Statute. /2/
In Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, United States
Marine Corps Air Station, Cherry Point, North Carolina, 15 FLRA No. 137
(1984), the Authority concluded that "any contention that an
arbitrator's award is deficient because it is contrary to any law, rule
or regulation must be made by invoking the procedures established by
Congress in section 7122(a) of the Statute." Where exceptions are not
filed thereto, the award becomes "final and binding." The Authority
concluded that "any failure to comply with a validly obtained
arbitrator's award to which no exceptions have been timely filed
constitutes a failure to comply with the requirements of section 7122 of
the Statute in violation of section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the Statute."
Although the Respondent contends that by paying two days backpay it
acted in full accord with the arbitrator's award, the Authority finds
that this contention is not sustained. Rather, in agreement with the
General Counsel and the Charging Party, the Authority finds that the
award on its face clearly requires the payment of four days backpay.
The Respondent, although conceding that it only paid two days backpay,
did not file exceptions to the award pursuant to section 7122(a) of the
Statute. In these circumstances, and based on the rationale more fully
explicated in Department of Defense, supra, the Authority concludes that
the Respondent failed to fully comply with Arbitrator Williams' October
22, 1982 award pursuant to the requirements of section 7122 of the
Statute, and thus, violated section 7116(a)(1) and (8) of the Statute.
/3/
ORDER
Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Federal Labor Relations
Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Statute, it is
hereby ordered that the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service
shall:
1. Cease and desist from:
(a) Failing and refusing to fully implement Arbitrator Timothy D. W.
Williams' October 22, 1982 arbitration award by failing to provide
employee James M. Murray with four days backpay as provided for in the
award.
(b) In any like or related manner interfering with, restraining or
coercing employees in the exercise of their rights assured by the
Statute.
2. Take the following affirmative action in order to effectuate the
purposes and policies of the Statute:
(a) Fully comply with Arbitrator Timothy D. W. Williams' October 22,
1982 arbitration award by providing employee James M. Murray with four
days backpay as provided for in the award.
(b) Post at its Portland, Oregon District Office facilities copies of
the attached Notice on forms to be furnished by the Federal Labor
Relations Authority. Upon receipt of such forms, they shall be signed
by the District Director, or his designee, and shall be posted and
maintained for 60 consecutive days thereafter, in conspicuous places,
including all bulletin boards and other places where notices to
employees are customarily posted. Reasonable steps shall be taken to
insure that such Notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any
other material.
(c) Pursuant to section 2423.30 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations, notify the Regional Director, Region IX, Federal Labor
Relations Authority, in writing, within 30 days from the date of this
Order, as to what steps have been taken to comply herewith.
Issued, Washington, D.C., December 18, 1984
/s/ Henry B. Frazier III
Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
Chairman
/s/ Ronald W. Haughton
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES
PURSUANT TO A DECISION AND ORDER OF THE FEDERAL LABOR
RELATIONS
AUTHORITY AND IN ORDER TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF CHAPTER 71
OF TITLE
5 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT
RELATIONS
WE HEREBY NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT:
WE WILL NOT fail and refuse to fully implement Arbitrator Timothy D.
W. Williams' October 22, 1982 arbitration award by failing to provide
employee James M. Murray with four days backpay as provided for in the
award.
WE WILL NOT in any like or related manner interfere with, restrain or
coerce employees in the exercise of their rights assured by the Statute.
WE WILL fully comply with Arbitrator Timothy D. W. Williams' October
22, 1982 arbitration award by providing employee James M. Murray with
four days backpay as provided for in the award.
(Agency or Activity)
Dated: By:
(Signature)
This Notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date
of posting, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other
material.
If employees have any questions concerning this Notice or compliance
with its provisions, they may communicate directly with the Regional
Director for the Federal Labor Relations Authority, Region IX, whose
address is: 530 Bush Street, Room 542, San Francisco, California 94108,
and whose telephone number is: (415) 556-8106.
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ The Charging Party, AFGE Local 1589, has been recognized as the
agent and local representative for the AFGE pursuant to the terms of
Respondent and AFGE's nationwide agreement for matters affecting
employees of the Respondent's Portland, Oregon District.
/2/ Section 7122(a) of the Statute provides that:
(a) Either party to arbitration under this chapter may file
with the Authority an exception to any arbitrator's award pursuant
to the arbitration (other than an award relating to a matter
described in section 7121(f) of this title). If upon review the
Authority finds that the award is deficient--
(1) because it is contrary to any law, rule, or regulation; or
(2) on other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts
in private sector labor-management relations; the Authority may
take such action and make such recommendations concerning the
award as it considers necessary, consistent with applicable laws,
rules, or regulations.
/3/ In view of this conclusion, the Authority finds it unnecessary to
determine whether the Respondent's conduct was also in violation of
section 7116(a)(5) of the Statute.