18:0741(86)NG - NAGE Local R7-36 and Army, Savanna Army Depot -- 1985 FLRAdec NG
[ v18 p741 ]
18:0741(86)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
18 FLRA No. 86
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL R7-36
Union
and
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY,
SAVANNAH ARMY DEPOT
Agency
Case No. 0-NG-1029
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority
pursuant to Section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and presents an issue
concerning the negotiability of the following provision of a local
agreement disapproved by the Agency head pursuant to section 7114(c) of
the Statute.
Article 7, Section 3-- Whenever a change in the work shift
currently in effect is contemplated in an area, the Employer
agrees to notify the employees concerned and the employee
organization, prior to making such a change. If a change is made,
except in emergencies, such change shall be announced in writing
at least two weeks in advance; . . . .
Upon careful consideration of the entire record, including the
parties' contentions, the Authority makes the following determinations.
The disputed provision in the instant case is to the same effect as
Provision 1 in American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO,
Local 2484 and U.S. Army Garrison, Fort Detrick, Maryland, 17 FLRA No.
106 (1985) which also required two weeks advance notice of changes in
tours of duty and which the Authority found to be inconsistent with an
applicable Government-wide regulation. /1/ In the cited case the
Authority determined that 5 CFR 610.121(b)(2) (1984) obligates an agency
head to revise an employee's administrative workweek to comport with the
hours during which the employee will actually be required to work
"(w)hen the head of an agency knows in advance of an administrative
workweek" that such revision is necessary. Thus, the Authority
concluded that as the provision therein would prevent the agency head
from revising an employee's work schedule unless he or she became aware
of the need to change work schedules not less than two weeks prior to
the rescheduling, it was inconsistent with a Government-wide regulation
and outside the duty to bargain. Therefore, based on U.S. Army
Garrison, Fort Detrick, since the instant provision would also, in
certain circumstances, prevent the Agency from complying with a
Government-wide regulation, it is likewise outside the duty to bargain
pursuant to section 7117(a)(1) of the Statute.
Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and
Regulations, IT IS ORDERED that the Union's petition for review be, and
it hereby is, dismissed. Issued, Washington, D.C., June 26, 1985
Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
Chairman
William J. McGinnis, Jr., Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------
/1/ The Union notes that the Authority in National Association of
Government Employees and Department of the Interior, 14 FLRA 280 (1984)
found a provision similar to the one in issue to be negotiable.
However, the agency did not raise the regulation concerning the
establishment of work schedules as a bar to negotiations in Department
of the Interior and, thus, this particular regulation was not considered
by the Authority in that case. The Authority, therefore, found the
provision to be within the duty to bargain based upon the record before
it, since it is well established that the parties bear the burden for
creating a record upon which the Authority can make its decision. See
National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1167 v. Federal Labor
Relations Authority, 681 F.2d 886, 891 (D.C. Cir. 1982), aff'd National
Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1167 and Department of the Air
Force, Headquarters, 31st Combat Support Group (TAC), Homestead Air
Force Base, Florida, 6 FLRA 574 (1981). See also American Federation of
State, County and Municipal Employees, Local 2477 and Library of
Congress, 14 FLRA 59 (1984).